Tag Archives: Quality

Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Draft Guidance on the Requirements for Quality Documentation Concerning Biological Investigational Medicinal Products in Clinical Trials

Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Draft Guidance on the Requirements for Quality Documentation Concerning Biological Investigational Medicinal Products in Clinical Trials

Full Text Here

This guideline outlines the requirements for the data to be presented on the biological, chemical and pharmaceutical quality of Investigational Medicinal Products (IMP) containing biological / biotechnology derived substances. In the EU, applications to conduct clinical trials are required to be submitted to the competent authority for approval prior to beginning a clinical trial in separately in each member state in which the trial is proposed to take place. Approval of trials is the responsibility of each involved Member State. This guideline aims to ensure harmonised requirements for the documentation to be submitted throughout the European Community. Available guidelines on the quality of biological / biotechnological medicinal products mainly address quality requirements for marketing authorisation applications. This guidance may not be fully applicable in the context of a clinical trial application; however the principles outlined in these guidelines are applicable and should be taken into consideration during development. A guideline on virus safety (EMEA/CHMP/BWP/398498/05) giving advice on the requirements for viral safety of IMP is available. The guideline on Strategies to Identify and Mitigate Risks for First-In-Human Clinical Trials with Investigational Medicinal Products (EMEA/CHMP/SWP/28367/07, current version) is also relevant. Assuring the quality of biological medicinal products is challenging, as often they consist of a number of product variants and process related impurities and it is difficult to predict the safety and efficacy profile of these variants and process related impurities. Unlike chemical entities, toxic impurities are generally not an issue, and the safety issues are more often related to the mechanism of action of the biological product or to immunogenicity. In the context of an overall development strategy, normally several clinical trials, using products from different versions of the manufacturing process, will be initiated to generate data to support a Marketing Authorisation Application. The objective of this document is to address the quality requirements of an investigational medicinal product for a given clinical trial, not to provide guidance on a Company’s overall development strategy for a medicinal product. Nevertheless, for all clinical development phases, it is the responsibility of the applicant (sponsor) to ensure protection of the clinical trial subjects using a high quality IMP that is suitable for its intended purpose, and to appropriately address those quality attributes that may impair patient’s safety (e.g. microbiological aspects, contamination, dose). There are clear differences between the requirements for a dossier for a clinical trial and a marketing authorisation dossier. Whilst the latter has to ensure a consistent, state-of-the-art quality of a product for widespread use in patients, information to be provided for an IMP should mainly focus on those quality attributes related to safety aspects. The extent of the information required for an IMP Dossier (IMPD) should take into account the nature of the product, the state of development / clinical phase, patient population, nature and severity of the illness as well as type and duration of the clinical trial itself. When compiling the quality part of the IMPD for phase II and phase III clinical studies, the wider exposure of patients to the product and the progressive product knowledge have to be taken into account compared to phase I clinical studies. Based on the diversity of products to be used in the different phases of clinical trials, the requirements defined in this guideline can only be taken as illustrative and cannot be expected to present an exhaustive list. IMPs based on innovative and/or complex technologies may require a more detailed data package for assessment.

Drug Regulators, European Medicines Agency, Publish Concept Paper on Revision of the Notes for Guidance on Gene Transfer Medicinal Products

Drug Regulators, European Medicines Agency, Publish Concept Paper on Revision of the Notes for Guidance on Gene Transfer Medicinal Products

Full Text Here

This Concept Paper proposes a revision of the Note for Guidance on the Quality, Preclinical and Clinical Aspects of Gene Transfer Medicinal Products (CPMP/BWP/3088/99) that came into effect in 2001. The revision of the Note for Guidance, Guideline according to the new terminology, will address the issues identified from clinical experience and provision of Scientific Advice on gene therapy medicinal products and will lay down detailed and updated requirements for the quality, nonclinical and clinical aspects of gene therapy medicinal products. The revised Guideline will refer to a number of recently developed scientific guidelines and will comply with Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products and the Commission Directive 2009/120/EC amending of the Annex I Part IV of Directive 2001/83/EC

Drug Regulators, EMEA, Publish Guidline on Xenogenic Cell-Based Medicinal Products

Drug Regulators, EMEA, Publish Guidline on Xenogenic Cell-Based Medicinal Products

Full Text Here

Xenogeneic cell-based therapy is the use of viable animal somatic cell preparations, suitably adapted for: (a) implantation/ infusion into a human recipient or (b) extracorporeal treatment through bringing (non-human) animal cells into contact with human body fluids, tissues or organs. The principal objective is reconstitution of cell/tissue/organ functions. The genotype and/or phenotype of the cells may have been modified, e.g. by isolation, culture, expansion, pharmacological treatment or
combination with various matrices. This guideline is an annex to the guideline on cell-based medicinal products (EMEA/CHMP/410869/2006) and deals specifically with requirements unique to xenogeneic specificities. This document is intended to provide general principles to be taken into consideration for the development and assessment of xenogeneic cell-based products without prejudice to medical practice or national legislation, which may be applicable. The main scientific and technical issues identified so far concern the sourcing and testing of animals, manufacture, quality control, as well as the non-clinical and clinical development of xenogeneic cellbased medicinal products are addressed. Relevant public health aspects are discussed and measures to ensure a proper surveillance for infections, including zoonoses are highlighted. These general
principles may apply to a range of products using animal tissues as the starting material, as the key objective is to ensure that the product to be administered is of acceptable quality and standard, and free from contamination.
The additional risks associated with xenogeneic cell-based Medicinal Products should be taken into account in the clinical development of these products. Attention is also given to principles of animal health and welfare in the processes of sourcing of xenogeneic materials for the medicinal products intended for human use.

Drug Regulators, EMEA, Publish ICH,Q8,Q9 & Q10, Note for Guidance on Pharmaceutical Development, Quality Risk Management and Quality Systems Q&A

Drug Regulators, EMEA, Publish ICH,Q8,Q9 & Q10, Note for Guidance on Pharmaceutical Development, Quality Risk Management and Quality Systems Q&A

Full Text Here

This Questions and Answers document (Q&A) refers to the current working procedure of the ICH Q-IWG on implementing the guidelines of Q8, Q9 and Q10 which have been approved by the ICH Steering Committee.
The benefits of harmonizing technical requirements across the ICH regions can only be reached if the various Q-ICH guidelines are implemented and interpreted in a consistent way across the three regions. Implementation Working Group is tasked to develop Q&As to facilitate implementation of existing guidelines.

Drug Regulatos Publish Draft Reflection Paper on In-vitro Cultured Chondrocyte Containing Products for Cartilage Repair

Drug Regulators, EMEA, Publish Draft Reflection Paper on In-vitro Cultured Chondrocyte Containing Products for Cartilage Repair

full text here

This reflection paper addresses specific points related to products containing autologous chondrocytes intended for the repair of lesion of cartilage of the knee not discussed in the ‘Guideline on human cell based medicinal products’ (EMEA/CHMP/410869/2006) and therefore it should be read in conjunction with the guideline. – Deadline for comments is 31st December 2009.

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Guidline on Quality, Non-Clinical and Clinical Aspects of Live Recombinant Viral Vectored Vaccines

EMEA publishes new guidelines, “Guideline on Quality, Non-Clinical and Clinical Aspects of Live Recombinant Viral Vectored Vaccines” . Vaccines against infectious diseases based on a viral vector expressing the antigen infectious agent have been under development for some time.This guideline ap pplies to such live recombinant vaccines for the prevention and treatment of infectious disease, and provides guidance on quality, non-clinical and clinical aspects.

The objective of this guideline is to provide recommendations on the quality, nonclinical and clinical studies should be performed in order to obtain marketing authorisation of a live recombinant viral vector vaccine intended to use in the prophylaxis of infectious disease in humans. This guideline is intended products entering the marketing authorisation procedure. However, the principles laid down in this guideline should be considered by applicants entering into clinical trials.

In this guideline, the emphasis is placed upon safety issues, such as:

  • The phenotype of recombinant virus
  • The extent of pre-immunity to the vector, the extent of community induced to the vector and the potential for reuse of the vector,
  • Genetic stability of the recombinant virus, reversion to the virulence or the combination with wild type strains
  • Clinical follow up in healthy patient populations
  • Chromosomal germline integration.

These aspects will drive the selection a number of different relevant toxicological pharmacological models. Emphasis is also placed on first in man studies as the vaccines within the scope of this guideline and novel laboratory derived viruses obtained by recombinant DNA technology and clinical assessment will represent their first contact with humans.

The guideline goes on to give detailed descriptions of what is expected in the following areas:

  • Quality aspects
    • General considerations
    • Genetic development
    • Vaccine seed lots
      • General
      • Characterisation of vaccine seed lots
      • Adventitious agent safety
    • Vaccine manufacture
      • Vaccine production
      • Harvesting
      • Virus pools
      • Final bulk vaccine (drug substance)
    • Control of final vaccine (drug product)
      • Identity
      • Potency assays
      • Stability
      • Consistency of production
  • Nonclinical immunological and safety requirements
    • General considerations
    • Pharmacodynamic studies (protection and immunogenicity)
    • Nonclinical safety studies (toxicity testing)
      • Single and repeated dose toxicity
      • Distribution studies
      • Reproduction and development toxicity studies
      • Local tolerance
  • Clinical
    • Immunogenicity
    • Safety

These are a detailed set of guidelines that cover most of the process of development and are required reading for anybody working in the area.

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com