Tag Archives: ICH

EMA, ICH E16, Genomic Biomarkers Related to Drug Response

EMA, ICH E16, Genomic Biomarkers Related to Drug Response

Full Text Here

The use of biomarkers has the potential to facilitate the availability of safer and more effective drug or biotechnology products, to guide dose selection and to enhance their benefit-risk profile. This guideline is based on previous experiences with submissions containing biomarker data in the various regions. These submissions have been either stand-alone biomarker qualification applications or a component of medicinal product-related regulatory process marketing applications (NDAs / BLAs / MAAs). The development of a consistent format for submission of biomarker data will facilitate easy review and exchange of assessments between regions.

For Assistance with Clinical Development Planning Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

EMA Publish ICH Q4B Guidlines, on Capilllary Electrophoresis

EMA Publish ICH Q4B Guidelines, on Capillary Electrophoresis.

Full Text Here

This annex is the result of the Q4B process for the Capillary Electrophoresis General Chapter. The proposed texts were submitted by the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group (PDG). The ICH Steering Committee, based on the evaluation by the Q4B Expert Working Group (EWG), recommends that the analytical procedures described in the official pharmacopoeial texts, Ph.Eur. 2.2.47. Capillary Electrophoresis, JP General Information 4. Capillary Electrophoresis, and USP General Information Chapter <1053> Biotechnology-derived Articles – Capillary Electrophoresis, can be used as interchangeable in the ICH regions.

For Assistance With Regulatory Compliance in Manufacture Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

EMA, ICH Q4B, Bacterial Endotoxins

EMA, ICH Q4B, Bacterial Endotoxins

Full Text Here

The ICH Steering Committee, based on the evaluation by the Q4B Expert Working Group (EWG), recommends that the analytical procedures described in the official pharmacopoeial texts, Ph.Eur. 2.6.14. Bacterial Endotoxins, JP 4.01 Bacterial Endotoxins Test, and USP General Chapter <85> Bacterial Endotoxins Test, can be used as interchangeable in the ICH regions subject to the following conditions:
Any of the three techniques can be used for the test. In the event of doubt or dispute, the gel-clot limit test should be used to make the final decision on compliance for the product being tested.
The Endotoxin Reference Standard should be calibrated to the current WHO (World Health Organization) International Standard for Endotoxin.

For Access to a CMC Expert Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

EMA Publish ICH M2 Guideline, Busines Requirements

EMA Publish ICH M2 Guideline, Business Requirements

Full Text Here

ICH M2 has initiated the development of the Next Major Version of the eCTD (eCTD NMV) to improve robustness, flexibility and long term stability of the message. In accordance with the decision by the ICH Steering Committee that technical specifications should no longer be developed solely within ICH, but should be created in collaboration with Standards Development Organisations (SDOs), the eCTD NMV will be developed jointly with the HL7 RPS project. M2 has developed the following list of requirements as input into the HL7 RPS Project.

For Assistance with Regulators Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

FDA Puiblish Guidance on Q4B, Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Text for Use in ICH regions, Annex 12 Analytical Sieving General Chapter

FDA Publish Guidance on Q4B, Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Text for Use in ICH regions, Annex 12 Analytical Sieving General Chapter.

Full Text Here

This annex is one in a series of guidance documents that describe the evaluations and recommendations by the Q4B Expert Working Group (EWG) of selected pharmacopoeial texts to facilitate their recognition by regulatory authorities for use as interchangeable in the ICH regions. Implementation of the Q4B annexes is intended to avoid redundant testing by industry. For general information on the Q4B process, the reader is referred to the core guidance Q4B Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in the ICH Regions.3
This annex is the result of the Q4B process for the Analytical Sieving General Chapter. The proposed texts were submitted by the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group (PDG).

For access to a CMC Expert Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

FDA Publish Q4B Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in ICH regions, Annex 11, Capillary Electrophoresis General Chapter

FDA Publish Q4B Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in ICH regions, Annex 11, Capillary Electrophoresis General Chapter.

Full Text Here

This annex is one in a series of guidance documents that describe the evaluations and recommendations by the Q4B Expert Working Group (EWG) of selected pharmacopoeial texts to facilitate their recognition by regulatory authorities for use as interchangeable in the ICH regions. Implementation of the Q4B annexes is intended to avoid redundant testing by industry. For general information on the Q4B process, the reader is referred to the core guidance Q4B Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in the ICH Regions.
This annex is the result of the Q4B process for the Capillary Electrophoresis General Chapter. The proposed texts were submitted by the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group (PDG).

For A CMC Expert Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

FDA, Publish Guidance on Animal Studies for Cardiovascular Disease

FDA, Publish Guidance on Animal Studies for Cardiovascular Disease.

Full Text Here

FDA has developed this guidance document to assist industry in designing evaluation strategies for, and reporting the results of, animal studies involving cardiovascular devices, including intra-cardiac devices and devices used in the coronary and peripheral vasculature. The animal studies utilized for the assessment of these devices typically provide initial evidence of device safety, their potential performance when used in a living system, and the biologic response that a living system may mount towards the device. We recommend that members of industry and FDA staff who perform or review evaluations of animal studies for cardiovascular devices use this guidance. In this document, the terms “you” and “your” refer to members of industry, also known as “sponsors” or “applicants”. The terms “we,” “us,” “our,” and “Agency” refer to FDA.
The intent of this guidance is to provide a reference of best practices for the approach, conduct, and presentation of animal study data intended to demonstrate that the device under study is sufficiently safe for early human experience, while accounting for modern animal care and use strategies. The guidance makes multiple references to pre-existing regulatory requirements involving animal care and use. Of note, FDA maintains a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) that addresses common areas of regulatory practice under which animal studies are to be performed.
We recommend that you use this guidance to develop and present animal study protocols, methods, and reports that support the safety and performance of cardiovascular devices. We intend to use this guidance to review animal study protocols, methods, data, and reports provided in regulatory submissions to demonstrate the safety and performance of cardiovascular devices.

For Access to  a Drug Development or Pre-Clinical Expert Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

DA has developed this guidance document to assist industry in designing evaluation strategies for, and reporting the results of, animal studies involving cardiovascular devices, including intra-cardiac devices and devices used in the coronary and peripheral vasculature.

The EMA, The European Drug Regulator, Published Q&A on ICH Topic E7, Studies in Support of Special Populations: Geriatrics Step 5

The EMA, The European Drug Regulator, Published Q&A on ICH Topic E7, Studies in Support of Special Populations: Geriatrics Step 5

Full Text Here

Why do we need an adequate representation of geriatric patients in the clinical database?

What should be taken into account when estimating an adequate representation of geriatric patients to be included in the clinical database?

Are there any special patient populations or characteristics that are particularly important to address in the planning of the clinical development program?

What should be considered for the clinical development program to adequately characterize the safety and efficacy of a drug for a marketing application?

Are there concerns related to the data specific to the geriatric population that could be considered in the planning of the clinical studies?

In light of recent advances in the field of pharmacokinetics and assessment of drug-drug interactions since the ICH E7 guideline was established, what studies should be  considered when developing a drug that will be used in geriatric patients?

To Access A Drug Development Expert Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

FDA, the USA drug regulatory, Publishes Draft Recommendation for the Revision of the Permitted Daily Exposure for Cumene According to the Maintenance Procedures for Q3C Impurities: Residual Solvents

FDA, the USA drug regulatory, Publishes Draft Recommendation for the Revision of the Permitted Daily Exposure for Cumene According to the Maintenance Procedures for Q3C Impurities: Residual Solvents.

Full Text Here

Cumene [synonyms: Cumol; isopropylbenzene; isopropylbenzol; (1-methyl/ethyl)benzene; 2phenylpropane]
is listed in the ICH Q3C guideline in Class 3, i.e. as a solvent with low toxicity. A summary of the toxicity data used by the EWG to establish a Permitted Daily Exposure (PDE) value for cumene at the time when the ICH Q3C guideline was signed off at Step 2 in November 1996 is published in Connelly et al., 1997 (1).
According to this report from the EWG no data from carcinogenicity studies with cumene were available. Regarding genotoxicity data cumene was reported negative in an Ames test and in Saccaromyces cerevisiae and positive in in vitro UDS and cell transformation assays using mouse embryo cells. Calculation of a PDE value was based on a rat toxicity study published in 1956. Female Wistar rats were given cumene at doses of 154, 462 and 769 mg/kg by gavage 5 days/week for 6 months. No histopathological changes but slight increases in kidney weights at the two higher doses were observed suggesting a NOEL of 154 mg/kg. It was concluded that the PDE for cumene is 55.0 mg/day i.e., cumene is a solvent with low toxicity to be listed in Class 3.
Meanwhile new toxicity data have been published including results from NTP 2-year inhalation studies showing that cumene is carcinogenic in rodents. A reappraisal of the PDE value of cumene according to the maintenance agreement from 1999 is therefore initiated. For establishing a revised PDE value in this document the standard approaches (modifying factors, concentration conversion from ppm to mg/L, values for physiological factors) as described in detail in Connelly et al. (1) were used.

For CMC Consultancy Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

Drug Regulators,FDA, Publish ICH Questions and Answers, Q8,Q9 and Q10

Drug Regulators,FDA, Publish ICH  Questions and Answers, Q8,Q9 and Q10

Full Text Here

Since the Q8, Q9, and Q10 guidances were made final, experiences implementing the guidances in the ICH regions have given rise to requests for clarification. This question and answer (Q&A) document is intended to clarify key issues. The guidance reflects the current working procedure of the ICH Quality Implementation Working Group (Q-IWG) for implementing the Q8, Q9, and Q10 guidances.
The benefits of harmonizing technical requirements across the ICH regions can be realized only if the various quality ICH guidances are implemented and interpreted in a consistent way across the three regions. The Q-IWG is tasked to develop Q&As to facilitate implementation of existing quality guidance.

Q8 (R2) Pharmaceutical Development (includes the Q8 parent guidance (Part I) and the annex (Part II), which provides further clarification of the Q8 parent guidance and describes the principles of quality by design)

Q9 Quality Risk Management

Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality Systems

Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Q4B Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in the ICH Regions; Annex 6: Uniformity of Dosage Unites General Chapter

Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Q4B Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in the ICH Regions; Annex 6: Uniformity of Dosage Unites General Chapter

Full Text Here

This annex is the result of the Q4B process for Uniformity of Dosage Units. The proposed texts were submitted by the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group (PDG).

Q4B OUTCOME
Analytical Procedures

The ICH Steering Committee, based on the evaluation by the Q4B Expert Working Group (EWG), recommends that the official pharmacopoeial texts, Ph.Eur. 2.9.40. Uniformity of Dosage Units, JP 6.02 Uniformity of Dosage Units, and USP General Chapter <905> Uniformity of Dosage Units, can be used as interchangeable in the ICH regions subject to the following conditions:

The Uniformity of Dosage Unit test is not considered to be interchangeable in the three regions unless the target test sample amount at time of manufacture (T) is 100% (i.e., T=100%).

Unless the 25 milligrams (mg)/25% threshold limit is met, the use of theMass/Weight Variation test as an alternative test for Content Uniformity is not considered interchangeable in all ICH regions.

For specific dosage forms which have been indicated in local text in the pharmacopoeias by enclosing the text within the black diamond symbols, application of the Uniformity of Dosage Units test is not considered interchangeable in all ICH regions.

For Mass/Weight Variation, the PDG-harmonised definition for ‘W Bar’ should be used.

If a correction factor is called for when different procedures are used for assay of the preparation and for the Content Uniformity Test, the correction factor should be specified and justified in the application dossier.

Acceptance Criteria
The acceptance criteria are harmonized between the three pharmacopoeias.

Click Here for – CMC Help and Advice – Click Here

Drug Regulators, FDA CDER, Publish Guidance on ICH Q4B Annex 10 Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis General Chapter for Pharmacopoeial Texts

Drug Regulators, FDA CDER, Publish Guidance on ICH Q4B Annex 10 Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis General Chapter for Pharmacopoeial Texts

Full Text Here

This annex is one in a series of guidance documents that describe the evaluations and recommendations by the Q4B Expert Working Group (EWG) of selected pharmacopoeial texts to facilitate their recognition by regulatory authorities for use as interchangeable in the ICH regions. Implementation of the Q4B annexes is intended to avoid redundant testing by industry. For general information on the Q4B process, the reader is referred to the core guidance Q4B Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in the ICH Regions.

This annex is the result of the Q4B process for the Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis General Chapter. The proposed texts were submitted by the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group (PDG).

Click Here – CMC Consulting Services – Click Here

Drug Regulators, FDA, CDER, Publish Guidance on ICH Q4B Annex 7 Dissolution Tests General Chapter for Pharmacopoeial Texts

Drug Regulators, FDA, CDER, Publish Guidance on ICH Q4B Annex 7 Dissolution Tests General Chapter for Pharmacopoeial Texts

full text here

This annex is one in a series of guidance documents that describe the evaluations and recommendations by the Q4B Expert Working Group (EWG) of selected pharmacopoeial texts to facilitate their recognition by regulatory authorities for use as interchangeable in the ICH regions. Implementation of the Q4B annexes is intended to avoid redundant testing by industry. For general information on the Q4B process, the reader is referred to the core guidance Q4B Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in the ICH Regions.
This annex is the result of the Q4B process for the Dissolution Test General Chapter. The proposed texts were submitted by the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group (PDG).

Click Here – CMC Consulting Services – Click Here

Drug Regulators, FDA, CDER, Publish Guidance on ICH Tablet Friability Q4B Annex 9

Drug Regulators, FDA, CDER, Publish Guidance on ICH Tablet Friability Q4B Annex 9

Full Text Hear

This annex is one in a series of guidance documents that describe the evaluations and recommendations by the Q4B Expert Working Group (EWG) of selected pharmacopoeial texts to facilitate their recognition by regulatory authorities for use as interchangeable in the ICH regions. Implementation of the Q4B annexes is intended to avoid redundant testing by industry. For general information on the Q4B process, the reader is referred to the core guidance Q4B Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in the ICH Regions.

This annex is the result of the Q4B process for the Tablet Friability General Chapter. The proposed texts were submitted by the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group (PDG).

Click Here – CMC Consulting Services – Click Here

Regulators Publish Guidance for Industry, Non Clinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorization.

Regulators Publish Guidance for Industry, Non Clinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorization.

Full Text Here

The purpose of this document is to recommend international standards for, and promote harmonization of, the nonclinical safety studies recommended to support human clinical trials of a given scope and duration as well as marketing authorization for pharmaceuticals. Harmonization of the guidance for nonclinical safety studies will help to define the current recommendations and reduce the likelihood that substantial differences will exist among regions.
This is a revision of the ICH guidance “M3 Nonclinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials for Pharmaceuticals” that published in 1997. The revisions further harmonize recommendations in a number of areas and include a new section on exploratory clinical studies. This revised guidance discusses other nonclinical studies that should be conducted on a case-by-case basis as appropriate, including phototoxicity studies, immunotoxicity studies, juvenile animal toxicity studies, and abuse potential studies.
This guidance should facilitate the timely conduct of clinical trials, reduce the use of animals in accordance with the 3R (reduce/refine/replace) principles, and reduce the use of other drug development resources. Although not discussed in this guidance, consideration should be given to use of new in vitro alternative methods for safety evaluation. These methods, if validated and accepted by all ICH regulatory authorities, can be used to replace current standard methods. This guidance promotes safe, ethical development and availability of new pharmaceuticals.

Click Here to – Access Pre-clinical (ICHM3) Expertise – Click Here

Drug Regulators, FDA CDER, Publish Guidance on Q4B Annex 8 Sterility Test General Chapter for ICH Regions

Drug Regulators, FDA CDER, Publish Guidance on Q4B Annex 8 Sterility Test General Chapter for ICH Regions

Full Text Here

This annex is one in a series of guidance documents that describe the evaluations and recommendations by the Q4B Expert Working Group (EWG) of selected pharmacopoeial texts to facilitate their recognition by regulatory authorities for use as interchangeable in the ICH regions. Implementation of the Q4B annexes is intended to avoid redundant testing by industry. For general information on the Q4B process, the reader is referred to the core guidance Q4B Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in the ICH Regions.
This annex is the result of the Q4B process for the Sterility Test General Chapter. The proposed texts were submitted by the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group (PDG).

Drug Regulators, FDA CDER, Publish Guidance on Q4B Annex5 Disintegration Test General Chapter for ICH regions

Drug Regulators, FDA CDER, Publish Guidance on Q4B Annex5 Disintegration Test General Chapter for ICH regions

Full Text Here

This annex is one in a series of guidance documents that describe the evaluations and recommendations by the Q4B Expert Working Group (EWG) of selected pharmacopoeial texts to facilitate their recognition by regulatory authorities for use as interchangeable in the ICH regions. Implementation of the Q4B annexes is intended to avoid redundant testing by industry. For general information on the Q4B process, the reader is referred to the core guidance Q4B Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in the ICH Regions.
This annex is the result of the Q4B process for Disintegration Test General Chapter. The proposed texts were submitted by the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group (PDG).

Drug Regulator, MHRA, Publishes an Updated Guide for Manufactures on Clinical Investigations to be Carried out in the UK

Drug Regulator, MHRA, Publishes an Updated Guide for Manufactures on Clinical Investigations to be Carried out in the UK

Full Text Here

The Medical Devices Regulations 2002 (SI No 618), as amended by the Medical Devices (Amendment) Regulations 2008, came into force on 13 June 2002 and implement the provisions of the Medical Devices Directive 93/42/EEC (as amended by Directive 2007/47/EC), the Active Implantable Medical Devices Directive 90/385/EEC (as amended by Directive 2007/47/EC) and the In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Directive 98/79/EEC. These Regulations establish systems under which a manufacturer must submit to the UK Competent Authority, information about clinical investigations of medical devices to be carried out in the UK.

These Notes outline the legal requirements relating to the conduct and performance of a clinical investigation as set out in these Regulations. They also provide background and guidance to manufacturers on how to apply for pre-clinical assessment of a proposed clinical investigation in human subjects, involving a device falling within the scope of the Regulations.

Manufacturers wishing to make an application for pre-clinical assessment of a proposed clinical investigation of an active implantable medical device or a medical device to be carried out in part or in whole in the UK should apply to the Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency of the Department of Health (referred to in this document as the UK Competent Authority), in accordance with these Guidance Notes.

This guidance is intended as a general explanation of the legislation and should not be regarded as an authoritative statement of the law nor as having any legal consequence. It follows that manufacturers and others should not rely solely on this guidance but should consult the legislation referred to and make their own decisions on matters affecting them in conjunction with their lawyers and other professional advisers. The MHRA does not accept liability for any errors, omissions or other statements in the
guidance whether negligent or otherwise. An authoritative statement could be given only by the courts. Information and assistance in individual cases may be sought from the UK Competent Authority whose address and telephone number are given on pages 12 – 13 of this document.

Drug Regulators, EMEA, Publish ICH Q4B, Annex 10, Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis General Chapter Guidance

Drug Regulators, EMEA, Publish ICH Q4B, Annex 10, Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis General Chapter Guidance.

Full Text Here.

This annex is the result of the Q4B process for the Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis General Chapter. The proposed texts were submitted by the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group (PDG).

Drug Regulators, EMEA, Publish ICH Q4B Annex 12, Analytical Sieving General Chapter Guidance

Drug Regulators, EMEA, Publish ICH Q4B Annex 12, Analytical Sieving General Chapter Guidance.

Full Text Here

This annex is the result of the Q4B process for the Analytical Sieving General Chapter. The proposed texts were submitted by the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group (PDG).