Tag Archives: Guideline

EMA publishes guideline on bioanalytical method validation

EMA has publishes guidelines to assist companies understand key elements required for validation of a bioanalytical method. It focuses on the validation geared towards quantitative concentration data used for pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic parameter definitions. Guidance on criteria of application of these validated methods in the routine analysis of study samples from animals and humans.

excerpts from guidance

full text here

This guideline defines key elements necessary for the validation of bioanalytical methods. The guideline focuses on the validation of the bioanalytical methods generating quantitative concentration data used for pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic parameter determinations. Guidance and criteria are given on the application of these validated methods in the routine analysis of study samples from animal and human studies.

Measurement of drug concentrations in biological matrices (such as serum, plasma, blood, urine, and saliva) is an important aspect of medicinal product development. Such data may be required to support applications for new actives substances and generics as well as variations to authorised drug products. The results of animal toxicokinetic studies and of clinical trials, including bioequivalence studies are used to make critical decisions supporting the safety and efficacy of a medicinal drug substance or product. It is therefore paramount that the applied bioanalytical methods used are well characterised, fully validated and documented to a satisfactory standard in order to yield reliable results.
Acceptance criteria wider than those defined in this guideline may be used in special situations. This should be prospectively defined based on the intended use of the method.

EMA Publish Guideline on Hep C Therapies

EMA Publish Guideline on Hep C Therapies.

Full Text Here

This guideline provides guidance on the clinical development of compounds for the treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C (CHC), including directly acting antivirals (DAAs) as well as host targeting antivirals (HTA). It should be read in conjunction with updated and recognised clinical treatment guidelines. Various combination regimens, including a DAA or HTA together with peginterferon (pegIFN) and ribavirin, regimens with more than one DAA/HTA in combination with pegIFN + ribavirin, as well as regimens excluding either or both of these agents, are considered.
While the primary investigation of new DAA/HTA in combination with pegIFN + ribavirin in patients with genotype (GT) 1 remains important, it is recognised that other paths of drug development, focussing on wider or alternative populations, or other drug combinations (such as more than one DAA/HTA with or without ribavirin, or 2 DAA/HTAs in combination with pegIFN+ribavirin) are warranted and ongoing.
The guidelines emphasize the importance of new DAA/HTA for usage in special populations including patients with decompensated liver disease, patients pre/post transplantation, HCV/HIV co-infected patients, patients intolerant to pegIFN and/or ribavirin and patients with prior DAA experience.
When studying novel agents in combination with pegIFN and ribavirin, the comparator in pivotal trials should be a licensed first line recommended regimen; notwithstanding this, European regulators recognise the need for licensed DAA/HTAs from several classes, with different side effects profiles and resistance patterns, which is seen as a benefit per se. When studying novel drug combinations without pegIFN, it is recommended that patients previously failing therapy with pegIFN+ribavirin that do not have an immediate treatment need be avoided prior to obtaining proof-of-concept of sustained virological response (SVR), as the consequences of acquired drug resistance in terms of retreatment success has still not been investigated. For drugs to be used in combinations eschewing pegIFN, it is recognised that patients that do not tolerate pegIFN have no presently licensed therapeutic options and a probability of viral clearance close to zero. Thus, for licensure, response rates would be weighed in relation to this fact. Regarding special populations, the need to start trials as early as can safely be done for groups with an important unmet medical need (e.g., patients with decompensated liver disease or HCV/HIV coinfection) is emphasised.
Since the previous guidelines were adapted, host IL-28B genotype has emerged as a very important predictor of the efficacy of pegIFN, and it is recommended that stratification by IL28B genotype be employed whenever the studied drug regimen includes this drug.
Regarding future developments, proof-of-concept of SVR with treatment combination excluding pegIFN, as well as data on retreatment of patients that have failed therapy that has selected for DAA-resistant variants, but whose dominant population has subsequently reverted to wild-type, are eagerly awaited. Such data are likely to greatly impact regulatory considerations within the field. It is recognised that this is a rapidly moving therapeutic area, and that a further revision of these guidelines may be mandated within the foreseeable future.

For Assistance with Developing Hep C Therapies Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

EMA Publish Guideline on Clinical Evaluation of Treatments for Hepatitis C

EMA Publish Guideline on Clinical Evaluation of Treatments for Hepatitis C

Full Text Here

This guideline provides guidance on the clinical development of compounds for the treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C (CHC), including directly acting antivirals (DAAs) as well as host targeting antivirals (HTA). It should be read in conjunction with updated and recognised clinical treatment guidelines. Various combination regimens, including a DAA or HTA together with peginterferon (pegIFN) and ribavirin, regimens with more than one DAA/HTA in combination with pegIFN + ribavirin, as well as regimens excluding either or both of these agents, are considered.
While the primary investigation of new DAA/HTA in combination with pegIFN + ribavirin in patients with genotype (GT) 1 remains important, it is recognised that other paths of drug development, focussing on wider or alternative populations, or other drug combinations (such as more than one DAA/HTA with or without ribavirin, or 2 DAA/HTAs in combination with pegIFN+ribavirin) are warranted and ongoing.
The guidelines emphasize the importance of new DAA/HTA for usage in special populations including patients with decompensated liver disease, patients pre/post transplantation, HCV/HIV co-infected patients, patients intolerant to pegIFN and/or ribavirin and patients with prior DAA experience.
When studying novel agents in combination with pegIFN and ribavirin, the comparator in pivotal trials should be a licensed first line recommended regimen; notwithstanding this, European regulators recognise the need for licensed DAA/HTAs from several classes, with different side effects profiles and resistance patterns, which is seen as a benefit per se. When studying novel drug combinations without pegIFN, it is recommended that patients previously failing therapy with pegIFN+ribavirin that do not have an immediate treatment need be avoided prior to obtaining proof-of-concept of sustained virological response (SVR), as the consequences of acquired drug resistance in terms of retreatment success has still not been investigated. For drugs to be used in combinations eschewing pegIFN, it is recognised that patients that do not tolerate pegIFN have no presently licensed therapeutic options and a probability of viral clearance close to zero. Thus, for licensure, response rates would be weighed in relation to this fact. Regarding special populations, the need to start trials as early as can safely be done for groups with an important unmet medical need (e.g., patients with decompensated liver disease or HCV/HIV coinfection) is emphasised, Since the previous guidelines were adapted, host IL-28B genotype has emerged as a very important predictor of the efficacy of pegIFN, and it is recommended that stratification by IL28B genotype be employed whenever the studied drug regimen includes this drug.
Regarding future developments, proof-of-concept of SVR with treatment combination excluding pegIFN, as well as data on retreatment of patients that have failed therapy that has selected for DAA-resistant variants, but whose dominant population has subsequently reverted to wild-type, are eagerly awaited. Such data are likely to greatly impact regulatory considerations within the field. It is recognised that this is a rapidly moving therapeutic area, and that a further revision of these guidelines may be mandated within the foreseeable future.

For Assistance with Planning The Development of Hepatitis C Therapies Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

EMA Publishes Guideline on Clinical Evaluation of Medicinal Products for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C

EMA Publishes Guideline on Clinical Evaluation of Medicinal Products for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C

Full Text Here

This guideline provides guidance on the clinical development of compounds for the treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C (CHC), including directly acting antivirals (DAAs) as well as host targeting antivirals (HTA). It should be read in conjunction with updated and recognised clinical treatment guidelines. Various combination regimens, including a DAA or HTA together with peginterferon (pegIFN) and ribavirin, regimens with more than one DAA/HTA in combination with pegIFN + ribavirin, as well as regimens excluding either or both of these agents, are considered.
While the primary investigation of new DAA/HTA in combination with pegIFN + ribavirin in patients with genotype (GT) remains important, it is recognised that other paths of drug development, focussing on wider or alternative populations, or other drug combinations (such as more than one DAA/HTA with or without ribavirin, or DAA/HTAs in combination with pegIFN+ribavirin) are warranted and ongoing.
The guidelines emphasize the importance of new DAA/HTA for usage in special populations including patients with decompensated liver disease, patients pre/post transplantation, HCV/HIV co-infected patients, patients intolerant to pegIFN and/or ribavirin and patients with prior DAA experience.
When studying novel agents in combination with pegIFN and ribavirin, the comparator in pivotal trials should be a licensed first line recommended regimen; notwithstanding this, European regulators recognise the need for licensed DAA/HTAs from several classes, with different side effects profiles and resistance patterns, which is seen as a benefit per se. When studying novel drug combinations without pegIFN, it is recommended that patients previously failing therapy with pegIFN+ribavirin that do not have an immediate treatment need be avoided prior to obtaining proof-of-concept of sustained virological response (SVR), as the consequences of acquired drug resistance in terms of retreatment success has still not been investigated. For drugs to be used in combinations eschewing pegIFN, it is recognised that patients that do not tolerate pegIFN have no presently licensed therapeutic options and a probability of viral clearance close to zero. Thus, for licensure, response rates would be weighed in relation to this fact. Regarding special populations, the need to start trials as early as can safely be done for groups with an important unmet medical need (e.g., patients with decompensated liver disease or HCV/HIV coinfection) is emphasised,
Since the previous guidelines were adapted, host IL-28B genotype has emerged as a very important predictor of the efficacy of pegIFN, and it is recommended that stratification by IL28B genotype be employed whenever the studied drug regimen includes this drug.
Regarding future developments, proof-of-concept of SVR with treatment combination excluding pegIFN, as well as data on retreatment of patients that have failed therapy that has selected for DAA-resistant variants, but whose dominant population has subsequently reverted to wild-type, are eagerly awaited. Such data are likely to greatly impact regulatory considerations within the field. It is recognised that this is a rapidly moving therapeutic area, and that a further revision of these guidelines may be mandated within the foreseeable future.

For Assistance with Clinical Development Planning and Regulatory Strategy Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

EMA, the European Regulator, Published a Concept Paper on the Need for Revision of the Note for Guidance on Modified Release Oral and Transdermal Dosage Forms: Section II (PK and Clinical Evaluation)

EMA, the European Regulator, Published a Concept Paper on the Need for Revision of the Note for Guidance on Modified Release Oral and Transdermal Dosage Forms: Section II (PK and Clinical Evaluation)

Full Text Here

This concept paper refers to the Note for Guidance on the evaluation of Modified Release Oral and Transdermal dosage forms (CPMP/EWP/280/96).
The primary purpose of Section II of this guideline is to define the studies necessary to investigate the biopharmaceutic and pharmacokinetic properties of modified release and transdermal formulations in man and to set out general principles for designing, conducting and evaluating such studies.
The guideline only deals with oral formulations and transdermal dosage forms for systemic use containing chemically defined drug substances.

The guideline on Modified Release Oral and Transdermal Dosage Forms (CPMP/EWP/280/96) was adopted in 1999. Following the emergence of new scientific knowledge, this document requires a revision. Points to Consider on the Clinical Requirements of Modified Release Products Submitted as a Line Extension of an Existing Marketing Authorisation (CPMP/EWP/1875/03) was adopted in 2003. The revision aims to combine these two documents into one restructured guideline. Also aspects from the Q&A: Positions on specific questions addressed to the EWP therapeutic subgroup on Pharmacokinetics, point 2: Requirements for food-interaction studies for modified release formulations (EMEA/618604/2008 Rev. 1) will be considered. Furthermore the revision of the Note for Guidance on the Investigation of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence (EWP/QWP/1401/98) generates the necessity of consequential adjustments.

For Drug Development Planning Services Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 EMA, the European Regulator, Published a Concept Paper on the Need for Revision of the Note for Guidance on Modified Release Oral and Transdermal Dosage Forms: Section II (PK and Clinical Evaluation)

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes EMA, the European Regulator, Published a Concept Paper on the Need for Revision of the Note for Guidance on Modified Release Oral and Transdermal Dosage Forms: Section II (PK and Clinical Evaluation)

Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish a Concept Paper on the Need for Revision of the Note for Guidance on Modified Release Oral and Transdermal Dosage Forms: Section II (Pharmacokinetic and Clinical Evaluation)

Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish a Concept Paper on the Need for Revision of the Note for Guidance on Modified Release Oral and Transdermal Dosage Forms: Section II (Pharmacokinetic and Clinical Evaluation)

Full text Here

This concept paper refers to the Note for Guidance on the evaluation of Modified Release Oral and Transdermal dosage forms (CPMP/EWP/280/96).
The primary purpose of Section II of this guideline is to define the studies necessary to investigate the biopharmaceutic and pharmacokinetic properties of modified release and transdermal formulations in man and to set out general principles for designing, conducting and evaluating such studies.
The guideline only deals with oral formulations and transdermal dosage forms for systemic use containing chemically defined drug substances.

The guideline on Modified Release Oral and Transdermal Dosage Forms (CPMP/EWP/280/96) was adopted in 1999. Following the emergence of new scientific knowledge, this document requires a revision. Points to Consider on the Clinical Requirements of Modified Release Products Submitted as a Line Extension of an Existing Marketing Authorisation (CPMP/EWP/1875/03) was adopted in 2003. The revision aims to combine these two documents into one restructured guideline. Also aspects from the Q&A: Positions on specific questions addressed to the EWP therapeutic subgroup on Pharmacokinetics, point 2: Requirements for food-interaction studies for modified release formulations (EMEA/618604/2008 Rev. 1) will be considered. Furthermore the revision of the Note for Guidance on the Investigation of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence (EWP/QWP/1401/98) generates the necessity of consequential adjustments.

Drug Regulator, EMA, Publishes a Concept Paper on the Need to Develop an Appendix to the Guideline on Bioequivalence Regarding the Presentation of Biopharmaceutical and Bioanalytical Data in Application Dossiers

Drug Regulator, EMA, Publishes a Concept Paper on the Need to Develop an Appendix to the Guideline on Bioequivalence Regarding the Presentation of Biopharmaceutical and Bioanalytical Data in Application Dossiers.

Full Text Here

There is a need to develop more structured guidance on how to present biopharmaceutical and bioanalytical data in the Marketing Authorisation Application (MAA) dossier, particularly for generic medicinal products. This is because the pivotal data subject to these types of application is located in various modules of the dossier hence optimising the presentation would facilitate the evaluation process.

Clinical evaluation of generic medicinal products requires the evaluation of data from bioequivalence, comparative dissolution and bioanalytical validation studies, respectively. European regulatory requirements of these data are set in several guidelines and other regulatory documents. Comprehensive assessment of these data requires evaluation of several source documents which are located in various CTD modules. The objective of CTD Module 2.7.1 is to facilitate the regulatory
review process by giving a detailed factual summarisation of all the relevant information in the MAA dossier with regard to biopharmaceutic studies and associated analytical methods.  However, this goal is not always met for generic applications partly because there is no clear regulatory guidance how to present relevant data in clinical summary reports, which leads to difficulties in the regulatory review process.

Click Here – Pre-clinical (ICHM3) Expert Services- Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulator, EMA, Publishes a Concept Paper on the Need to Develop an Appendix to the Guideline on Bioequivalence Regarding the Presentation of Biopharmaceutical and Bioanalytical Data in Application Dossiers

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulator, EMA, Publishes a Concept Paper on the Need to Develop an Appendix to the Guideline on Bioequivalence Regarding the Presentation of Biopharmaceutical and Bioanalytical Data in Application Dossiers

Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Draft Guidline on the Investigation of Drug Interactions

Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Draft Guideline on the Investigation of Drug Interactions.

Full Text Here

The potential for interactions between new medicinal products and already marketed drugs should be evaluated. This applies both to effects of the medicinal product on other drugs as well as the effect of other drugs on the medicinal product. Furthermore the effect of concomitant food intake needs to be investigated. The interaction potential is usually investigated through in vitro studies followed by in vivo studies. In addition, studies in other species may be relevant for studies of pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions. The results of interaction studies are used to predict a number of other interactions based on the mechanism involved. Treatment recommendations are developed based on the clinical relevance of the interactions and the possibility to make dose adjustments or treatment monitoring. This document aims as providing recommendations on all these issues. General recommendations are also provided for herbal medicinal products.

Drug-drug interactions are a common problem during drug treatment and give rise to a large number of hospital admissions within the EU. The aim of this guideline is to ensure that sufficient knowledge has been gained regarding potential drug interactions with medicinal products and furthermore, that the prescriber receives clear information on the interaction potential as well as practical recommendations on how the interactions should be handled during clinical use. The first CHMP interaction guideline was adopted in 1997 and this is the first revision of this guideline. During the past 20 years, scientific progress has made it possible to predict clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug interactions based on a limited number of in vitro and in vivo studies. In the last decade, knowledge has been gained in the areas of enzyme induction and drug transport which has opened up the possibility to better predict interactions via these mechanisms. However, in the area of drug transport, the knowledge about clinical consequences of drug-drug interactions is still limited and our understanding needs to be increased. The aim of the interaction studies performed on new medicinal products under development is to gain knowledge on how the new medicinal product affects other medicinal products and vice versa. The interaction potential should be taken into account in the risk-benefit evaluation of the drug. The potential for interactions is mainly investigated before marketing of a drug. Additional studies may be needed post-marketing as follow up measures/commitments or to support variation applications, e.g. for new indications or new dose recommendations. There may also be a need to perform additional studies due to newly gained knowledge as science develops or due to indications of drug interactions reported post marketing. The marketing authorization holder is advised to perform and report interaction studies as needed during the full life-cycle of the medicinal product. This guideline aims to give recommendations and advice on which drug-drug interaction and food-drug interaction studies to perform for medicinal products. The guideline also aims at giving advice on study design, presentation of study results and translation of these results to treatment recommendations in the labeling of the drug. It should be remembered that if justified, other approaches may be used than the ones recommended in this document. The interaction studies performed should be driven by science and by the expected clinical consequences of the interaction. Interactions with specific foods and herbal medicinal products may occur and should be included in the labeling if clinically relevant interactions are expected. General recommendations are presented in the guideline. Interactions with therapeutic proteins, pharmaceutical drug-drug interactions related to physiochemical properties and impact of drugs on clinical chemical laboratory tests are not discussed in this guideline.

Click Here – Pre-Clinical (ICH M3) Expert Services – Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Draft Guidline on the Investigation of Drug Interactions

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Draft Guidline on the Investigation of Drug Interactions

Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Concept Paper on Need for Revision of the Guideline on Stability Testing for Applications for Variations to a Marketing Authorisation

Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Concept Paper on Need for Revision of the Guideline on Stability Testing for Applications for Variations to a Marketing Authorisation.

Full Text Here

The Joint Human/Veterinary “Guideline on Stability Testing for Applications for Variations to a Marketing Authorisation” (CPMP/QWP/576/96 Rev 1; EMEA/CVMP/373/04) came into effect on 1 December 2005. Since then, changes have been made to the underlying variations legislation. The guideline therefore needs to be revised to be in line with these changes.

In January 2010, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1234/2008 concerning the examination of variations to the terms of marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use and veterinary medicinal products (‘the Variations Regulation’) came into force. This replaces 2 previous Regulations and changes the nomenclature of, and procedures for, some types of variations to medicinal products.
In addition, two Commission Guidelines came into effect in January 2010, the “Guideline on the details of the various categories of variations to the terms of marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use and veterinary medicinal products” (‘the Classification Guideline’) and the “Guideline on the operation of the procedures laid down in Chapters II, III and IV of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1234/2008 of 24 November 2008 concerning the examination of variations to the terms of marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use and veterinary medicinal products” (‘the Procedural Guideline’).
As a consequence of all the above changes, the relevant sections of the Guideline on Stability Testing for Applications for Variations to a Marketing Authorisation now need to be revised.

Click – CMC (Manufacturing) Services – Click

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Concept Paper on Need for Revision of the Guideline on Stability Testing for Applications for Variations to a Marketing Authorisation

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Concept Paper on Need for Revision of the Guideline on Stability Testing for Applications for Variations to a Marketing Authorisation

Drug Regulators, EMEA (EMA), Publish a Concept Paper on the Need For Guidance on Clinical Investigations of Medicinal Products in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus

Drug Regulators, EMEA (EMA), Publish a Concept Paper on the Need For Guidance on Clinical Investigations of Medicinal Products in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus.

Full Text Here

The current CHMP Note for guidance on clinical investigation of medicinal products in the treatment of diabetes mellitus CPMP/EWP/1080/00 was adopted by the CHMP in November 2002.  New aspects have emerged since then including:
- Paediatric regulation has been implemented and a need for specific trials in children and adolescents with diabetes is considered.
- A number of new medicines for diabetes have been approved.
- Some medicines have only limited long-term safety data and may be associated with an increased cardiovascular risk.
- The possibility to develop medicines for the prevention of diabetes has been proposed.
- Combination treatment studies, especially with insulin, become more and more complex.
Therefore, the points mentioned above may deserve discussion and a need to update the guidance has been identified.

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulattions, rules and initiatives each month, and summarise them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, EMEA (EMA), Publish a Concept Paper on the Need For Guidance on Clinical Investigations of Medicinal Products in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, EMEA (EMA), Publish a Concept Paper on the Need For Guidance on Clinical Investigations of Medicinal Products in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus

Drug Regulators, EMEA, Publish Draft Guidance on Validation of Bioanalytical Methods

Drug Regulators, EMEA, Publish Draft Guidance on Validation of Bioanalytical Methods.

Full Text Here

Measurement of drug concentrations in biological matrices is an important aspect of medicinal product development for those products containing new active substances as well as for line extensions and generic products. Such data may be required to support new applications as well as variations to authorised drug products. The results of toxicokinetic, pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence studies are used to make critical decisions supporting the safety and efficacy of a medicinal drug substance or product. It is therefore paramount that the applied bioanalytical methods used are well characterised, fully validated and documented to a satisfactory standard in order to yield reliable results.
Acceptance criteria wider than those defined in this guideline may need to be used in special situations, such as analysis of complex matrices (e.g. solid tissues), when usual acceptance criteria cannot be met. This should be justified and prospectively defined.

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free.

As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

First name

E-mail address

This guideline ap
recombinant vaccines for the prevention and treatment of infectious disease, and provides guidance on quality, non-clinical and clinical aspects.
ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, EMEA, Publish Draft Guidance on Validation of Bioanalytical Methods

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, EMEA, Publish Draft Guidance on Validation of Bioanalytical Methods

Turn your Business Into an Investor Magnet

How to Write a Business Plan – Free E-Course

Get the secrets that turns your project into an investment magnet, 100% of our clients raise the finance they need to take their projects to the next stage, we will share these secrets with you. – Sign up for Free

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”