This Excel file contains change history and the breakdown of our questions submitted on eCTD structure and specifications.
This file should be viewed in Excel and can be downloaded from the FDA website
This Excel file contains change history and the breakdown of our questions submitted on eCTD structure and specifications.
This file should be viewed in Excel and can be downloaded from the FDA website
Posted in regulatory
Tagged eCTD, electronic common technical dossier, FDA, M2, specification
Full Text Here
ICH M2 has initiated the development of the Next Major Version of the eCTD (eCTD NMV) to improve robustness, flexibility and long term stability of the message. In accordance with the decision by the ICH Steering Committee that technical specifications should no longer be developed solely within ICH, but should be created in collaboration with Standards Development Organisations (SDOs), the eCTD NMV will be developed jointly with the HL7 RPS project. M2 has developed the following list of requirements as input into the HL7 RPS Project.
Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.
Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.
“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”
Full text is an excell spreadsheet, its available from me on request. damien.bove@idaconsultants.com or on the EMEA website.
This question and answer document is a summary of questions reviewed by the eCTD Implementation Working Group (IWG) on the eCTD Specification. The questions answered here relate to common questions that relate to the eCTD in all three ICH regions. Many of the questions received on the Step 2 specification were addressed in Step 4 and do not appear in the list. Questions concerning the timeframe for implementation of region-specific application types, module 1 implementation, lifecycle management and those questions that relate to items in the specification that direct the reader to each region are answered in guidance documents published for each region.
Questions related to the table of contents for the Common Technical Document (CTD) should be directed to the CTD question and answer section of the ICH Website.
Some of the questions posed so far address change requests to the eCTD Specification. The change request section of this document addresses all those items received by the eCTD IWG and indicates their status.
This document will be updated as the specification undergoes change control or as new questions are submitted to the eCTD IWG.
Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.
As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.
Get the secrets that turns your project into an investment magnet, 100% of our clients raise the finance they need to take their projects to the next stage, we will share these secrets with you. – Sign up for Free
“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”
Posted in business, licensing, regulatory
Tagged common technial document, CTD, eCTD, ICH, ICH M2
The European Commission has published draft guidance for comment on “Detailed guidance for the request for authorisation of a clinical trial on a medicinal product for human use to the competent authorities, notification of substantial amendments and declaration of the end of the trial” Contributions should be sent by e-mail to entr-pharmaceuticals@ec.europa.eu on 8 September 2009 at the latest.
The scope of this guideline is the scope of Directive 2001/20/EC. Directive 2001/20/EC applies to all interventional clinical trials involving medicinal products as defined in Article 1(2) of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (hereinafter “Directive 2001/83/EC”). This includes interventional clinical trials involving:
The Guidance is too large to give a detailed review here but I will try and pull out the most interesting sections.
The applicant should submit and sign a covering letter with the application. Its heading should contain the EudraCT number and the sponsor protocol number with a title of the trial. In the covering letter, the applicant should draw attention to peculiarities of the trial.
Before submitting an application to the national competent authority, the sponsor should obtain a unique EudraCT number from the EudraCT database by the procedure described in the Detailed guidance on the European clinical trials database.
The application form is accessible via the internet by the procedure described in the Detailed guidance on the European clinical trials database. The application form should uniquely identify the clinical trial and the organisations and key individuals responsible for the conduct of the trial.
According to Article 2(h), 1st period, of Directive 2001/20/EC, the protocol is “a document that describes the objective(s), design, methodology, statistical
considerations and organisations of a trial.”
The content and format of the protocol should comply with Section 6 of the Community guideline on Good Clinical Practice (CPMP/ICH/135/95).
According to Article 2(g) of Directive 2001/20/EC, the investigator’s brochure (“IB”) is “a compilation of the clinical and non-clinical data on the investigational medicinal product or products which are relevant to the study of the product or products in human subjects.” A request for authorisation has to be accompanied with an IB.
The content, format and procedures for updating the IB has to comply with Article 8(1) of the Commission Directive 2005/28/EC laying down principles and detailed guidelines for good clinical practice as regards investigational medicinal products for human use, as well as the requirements for authorisation of the manufacturing or importation of such products (hereinafter referred to as Directive 20005/28/EC) and with the Community guideline on Good Clinical Practice (CPMP/ICH/135/95).
Article 2(d) of Directive 2001/20/EC defines an IMP as follows: “[A] pharmaceutical form of an active substance or placebo being tested or used as a reference in a clinical trial, including products already with a marketing authorisation but used or assembled (formulated or packaged) in a way different from the authorised form, or when used for an unauthorised indication, or when used to gain further information about the authorised form.”
The IMP Dossier (“IMPD”) gives information to justify the quality of any IMP (i.e. including reference product and placebo) to be used in the clinical trial. It should also provide data from non-clinical studies and the previous clinical use of the IMP or justify in the application why information is not provided.
The sponsor has the possibility to submit a simplified IMPD if the information can be made available by referring to other submissions.
Medicinal products used in the context of a clinical trial and not falling within the definition of IMP are non-investigational medicinal products (“NIMPs”). The “borderline” between IMPs and NIMPs is described in the Guidance on Investigational Medicinal Products (IMPs) and other medicinal products used in Clinical Trials. It is strongly recommended that NIMPs with marketing authorisation in the Member State concerned are used for these purposes when possible. When this is not possible, the next choice should be NIMPs with marketing authorisation in another Member State. A SmPC for each NIMP with a marketing authorisation should be submitted with the clinical trials application dossier.
Notification/submission for information40 is only obligatory if the amendment is substantial or otherwise significant. Directive 2001/20/EC does not require notification of non-substantial amendments.
Article 10 (c) of Directive 2001/20/EC reads as follows: “Within 90 days of the end of a clinical trial the sponsor shall notify the competent authorities of the Member State or Member States concerned and the Ethics Committee that the clinical trial has ended. If the trial has to be terminated early, this period shall be reduced to 15 days and the reasons clearly explained.”
“End of the trial” is not defined in Directive 2001/20/EC. The definition of the end of the trial should be provided in the protocol and any change to this definition for whatever reason should be notified as a substantial amendment. In most cases it will be the date of the last visit of the last patient undergoing the trial. Any exceptions to this should be justified in the protocol.
The sponsor should make an end of trial declaration using the form published in Volume 10 of Eudralex – the Rules Governing Medicinal Products in the European Union
The clinical trial summary report is part of the end of trials notification. However, the clinical trial summary report can be submitted subsequently to the end of trials notification.
If a new event occurs after the termination of the trial that is likely to change the risk/benefit analysis of the trial and could still have an impact on the trial participants, the sponsor should notify the national competent authority and Ethics Committee of the Member State concerned and provide a proposed course of action.
Details of the Table of Contents of the Common Technical Document (CTD, eCTD) are given in the appendix.
If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com
Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.
Get the secrets that turns your project into an investment magnet, 100% of our clients raise the finance they need to take their projects to the next stage, we will share these secrets with you. – Sign up for Free
As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.
Posted in clinical, regulatory
Tagged authorisation, Clinical trials regualtions, CTD, eCTD, EU, notification
The EMEA publishes ICH Topic M 2 Question and Answer Common Technical Document for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use
Its a huge document that I would recommend you reading as its too big and varied to summarise here, but the document reference so you can search for it is CPMP/ICH/820/03.
This question and answer document is a summary of questions reviewed by the eCTD Implementation Working Group (IWG) on the eCTD Specification. The questions answered here relate to common questions that relate to the eCTD in all three ICH regions. Many of the questions received on the Step 2 specification were addressed in Step 4 and do not appear in the list. Questions concerning the timeframe for implementation of region-specific application types, module 1 implementation, lifecycle management and those questions that relate to items in the specification that direct the reader to each region are answered in guidance documents published for each region.
Questions related to the table of contents for the Common Technical Document (CTD) should be directed to the CTD question and answer section of the ICH Website.
Some of the questions posed so far address change requests to the eCTD Specification. The change request section of this document addresses all those items received by the eCTD IWG and indicates their status.
This document will be updated as the specification undergoes change control or as new questions are submitted to the eCTD IWG.
If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com
Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.
As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.
The FDA has produced a revised version of the Q8 pharmaceutical development guidance. This guidance is a revision of the ICH Q8 pharmaceutical development guidelines were published in May 2006.the Q8 guidance describes the suggested contents for the 3.2 .P .2 (pharmaceutical development) section of the regulatory submission in the ICH M4 common technical document (CTD) format.
The pharmaceutical development section provides an opportunity present the knowledge gained with application of scientific approaches and quality and risk management of the development of a product and its manufacturing process. This documentation is first produced for the original marketing application and can be updated to support new knowledge gained of the life-cycle of a product. the pharmaceutical development section is intended to provide a comprehensive understanding of the product and manufacturing process for reviews and inspectors. The guidance also indicate areas where the demonstration of greater understanding the pharmaceutical Manufacturing sciences can create a basis for flexible regulatory approaches. The degree of regulatory flexibility is predicted on level relevant scientific knowledge provided.
This guidance does not apply to contents of submissions of the drug product during the clinical research stages of drug development. However, the principles in this guidance are important to consider during all stages as well. This guidance might also be appropriate for the types of products.
The guidance goes through each of the sections in turn and describes the relevant content the regulators expect to see in that section:
The guidance is so specific as to render any summary redundant readers are directed to download the entire document by clicking this link.
The bulk of changes to the document and incorporated in an annexe at the back of the guidance, this annex provides further clarification of key concepts outlined in Q8 pharmaceutical development. In addition, this annex describes the principles of quality by design. The annex is not intended to establish new standards or to introduce new regulatory requirements; however, it shows how concepts and tools outlined in the Q8 parent guidance could be put into practice by the applicant for all dosage forms.
this annex suggests strategic and quality systems that a company can adopt at the very start of the drug discovery programme, it describes approaches to pharmaceutical development, that the FDA and the International commission on harmonisation (ICH) would recommend for any company developing a pharmaceutical product with a significant commitment to quality. The guidance goes on to describe a number of elements that should be included at a minimum:
Each of these strategies in elements and described in some detail, the FDA go to great pains to point out that this is not a regulatory framework, better recommended system that they believe will ensure increased quality. I believe this documentation to be of such critical nature is to be recommended reading for anybody working in the area of drug development of discovery.
Please expect a more detailed review to this document to be published on this site.
If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com
Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.
Grow your Expertise for Free
As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.
Posted in clinical, regulatory
Tagged CTD, Drug Development Strategy, eCTD, FDA, Q8, quality by design.
Yes even more FDA guidance this week, Guidance for Industry Intergrated Summaries of Effectivenss and Safety: Location within the Common Technical Document.
This new guidance focuses on where to place ISE and ISS documents within the structure of the CTD or eCTD. It does not outline in detail the content for the ISE and ISS. The content will be addressed in separate guidance’s.
This guidance is intended to clarify for industry where to include the integrated summary of effectiveness (ISE) and integrated summary of safety (ISS) when submitting applications in the common technical document (CTD) format. The guidance applies to applicants submitting new drug applications (NDAs) or biologic license applications (BLAs) to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the CTD or the electronic common technical document (eCTD) format.
The ISE and ISS are not summaries but rather detailed integrated analyses of all relevant data from the clinical study reports that belong in Module 5. The FDA consider the ISE and ISS critical components of the clinical efficacy and safety portions of a marketing or licensing application. However there are other modules that need this data and the FDA is providing guidance where this information should be used.
the CDT/eCDT Module 2 contains several clinical sections that are summaries, these should in general follow the outline of the ISE and ISS. It should be noted that the model 2 section is limited to 400 pates and the typical ISS alone us often substantially larger, which in itself necessitates the need for editing. The section include:
Sections 2.7.3 and 2.7.4 should contain summarized information from the full ISE and ISS, only in unusual cases should the narrative parts of the full ISE or ISS and the summaries in sections 2.7.3 and 2.7.4 be the same.
Sections 5.3.5.3, should contain more detailed in-depth analysis, and unlike Module 2, Module 5 has no space limitations, Module 5 is the appropriate CTD / eCTD section for analyses containing large appendices of tables, figures and data sets typically found in an ISE and ISS.
More detail is provided in the Guidance and this should be reviewed before starting these sections in your CTD or eCTD.
If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com
Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.
Posted in clinical, medical report, regulatory, report
Tagged CTD, drug development, eCTD, FDA, Regualtory Guidance
As part of our consulting work in drug development we frequently get involved in the production of Regulatory Documentation, often directing and managing the process. Regulators are now preferring the use eCTD format, this is a trend that will only get more important as time goes on and people developing drugs will need to start to think and implement these process if they are not already doing so. It is a global movement in 2000 the ICH agreed a eCTD format that is being taken up globally, in Europe it is set to become mandatory in 2010 with the USA and Canada following shortly after.
The number of eCTD applications being submitted is on the increase, there has been a 300% increase between Dec 2007 and Dec 2008, unfortunately however this is coming at a cost and that is in terms of errors being made. But the majority of these errors can be avoided, through good planning and QC processes.
Basics of eCTD:
The eCTD is built using specialist software, the output follows the module format we are familiar with, but the document uses an XML backbone to generate and maintain a table of contents (TOC), this TOC is bookmarked and hyperlinked so the reader can navigate and move through the document with ease.
Benefits of eCTD
Less physical storage space than conventional paper documents (less money on space and security)
Less time to move and update (again massive cost savings to be made)
Hugely efficient for review bodies to deal with (speeded up review times and reduce errors)
The status of the document can be easily monitored (money savings, time savings, and error reduction)
Global re-formatting is fast and simple (reduced and cost and time)
Current Status
There has been a huge rise in the number of eCTD’s being submitted, however with anything new there have been a large number of errors, most likely broken hyperlinks and failing TOC’s. The regulatory authorities have turned a blind eye to these errors as the other benefits have easily overcome these and the process is still new to so many. However this period of grace appears to be running out.
“its been 6 months since the CDER division of the FDA started requiring all electronic submissions to use the eCTD format, and all is not well” – Ann Neuer, The eCTD a six month checkup, BioIT-World 28th July 2008
How to avoid errors
Guidance Documents
there are a number of guidance documents available for review.
EMEA -http://esubmission.emea.europa.eu/doc/index.html
FDA – http://www.fda.gov/cder/regulatory/ersr/default.htm
It is important that you check these sites regularly to ensure you are up to date with requirements.
Good Practice
There are a number of processes and tools that can be highly effective in maintaining a eCTD project.
As consultants working in the area of drug development, regulatory strategy and development strategy we are often involved in these kinds of document development processes and good housekeeping is vital. eCTD is coming to us all so its best we get up to speed as early as possible.
If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch using the contact form or email Damien at damien.bove@idaconsultants.com
Posted in regulatory
Tagged eCTD, electronic Common Technical Document, EMEA, FDA, regualtory