Tag Archives: comparability

EMA Publish Reflection Paper on IV Liposomal Products

EMA Publish Reflection Paper on IV Liposomal Products

Full Text Here

There has been a significant interest to develop drug delivery methods for potent albeit sometimes toxic, highly lipophilic/poorly water soluble, unstable compounds, or for tissue targeting of highly water soluble compounds. One of the strategies has been encapsulation of the active substance(s) in the aqueous phase of a liposome, or incorporation or binding to the lipid components. Liposomes are classically described as vesicles composed of one or more concentric lipidic bi-layers. Such variants include, but are not limited to, multi-vesicular liposomes, polymer-coated vesicles and lipidic complexes. In any given product, a proportion of the active substance could also be extra-liposomal, free in bulk solution.
Early parenteral liposomal products were found to have a number of critical pharmacokinetic properties including rapid recognition and removal by the monocyte phagocyte system (MPS) and premature drug-release (instability). It was also recognized that the physicochemical properties of the liposomes, such as particle size, membrane fluidity, surface-charge and composition were relevant determinants of such in vivo behaviour. Some formulations were found to benefit from the addition of sterols (e.g. cholesterol), size reduction and surface modification with covalently linked polymers (e.g. polyethylene glycol [PEG]), to provide significant improvements.
Contrary to products where the active substance is in simple solution, liposomal medicinal products have formulation-specific distribution characteristics in-vivo and similar plasma concentrations may not correlate to equivalent therapeutic performance. The complete characterisation of the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of a new liposomal product is critical to establish safe and effective use because formulation differences may substantially modify efficacy/safety due to specific cell interactions and distribution characteristics which are not detectable by conventional bioequivalence testing alone. The aims of developing the originator and the evidence supporting its use should be taken into account when designing the non-clinical and clinical programme for the liposomal products developed with reference to that particular originator.
The reference liposomal product used for comparability investigations should be sourced from within the EU and should be used as a comparator in all proposed characterization studies.
This document discusses the principles for assessing liposomal products developed with reference to an innovator liposomal product but does not aim to prescribe any particular analytical, nonclinical or clinical strategy.


For Assistance with Developing Liposomal Products Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

EMA Publish Paper on Intravenous Liposomal Product Development

EMA Publish Paper on Intravenous Liposomal Product Development

Full Text Here

There has been a significant interest to develop drug delivery methods for potent albeit sometimes toxic, highly lipophilic/poorly water soluble, unstable compounds, or for tissue targeting of highly water soluble compounds. One of the strategies has been encapsulation of the active substance(s) in the aqueous phase of a liposome, or incorporation or binding to the lipid components. Liposomes are classically described as vesicles composed of one or more concentric lipidic bi-layers. Such variants include, but are not limited to, multi-vesicular liposomes, polymer-coated vesicles and lipidic complexes. In any given product, a proportion of the active substance could also be extra-liposomal, free in bulk solution.
Early parenteral liposomal products were found to have a number of critical pharmacokinetic properties including rapid recognition and removal by the monocyte phagocyte system (MPS) and premature drug-release (instability). It was also recognized that the physicochemical properties of the liposomes, such as particle size, membrane fluidity, surface-charge and composition were relevant determinants of such in vivo behaviour. Some formulations were found to benefit from the addition of sterols (e.g. cholesterol), size reduction and surface modification with covalently linked polymers (e.g. polyethylene glycol [PEG]), to provide significant improvements.
Contrary to products where the active substance is in simple solution, liposomal medicinal products have formulation-specific distribution characteristics in-vivo and similar plasma concentrations may not correlate to equivalent therapeutic performance. The complete characterisation of the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of a new liposomal product is critical to establish safe and effective use because formulation differences may substantially modify efficacy/safety due to specific cell interactions and distribution characteristics which are not detectable by conventional bioequivalence testing alone. The aims of developing the originator and the evidence supporting its use should be taken into account when designing the non-clinical and clinical programme for the liposomal products developed with reference to that particular originator.
The reference liposomal product used for comparability investigations should be sourced from within the EU and should be used as a comparator in all proposed characterization studies.
This document discusses the principles for assessing liposomal products developed with reference to an innovator liposomal product but does not aim to prescribe any particular analytical, nonclinical or clinical strategy.
This reflection paper should be read in connection with the following documents:
Directive 2001/83/EC, as amended
Part II of the Annex I of Directive 2001/83/EC, as amended
CHMP/437/04 Guideline on similar biological medicinal products
Annex II to Note for Guidance on Process Validation CHMP/QWP/848/99 and EMEA/CVMP/598/99 Non Standard Processes (CPMP/QWP/2054/03)
Guideline on similar medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substances: quality issues
ICH topic Q5E – Comparability of biotechnological/biological products
ICH topic S6 – Note for guidance on Pre-clinical Safety Evaluation of Biotechnology-Derived Pharmaceuticals (CPMP/ICH/302/95)

ICH topic E9 statistical principles for clinical trials – Note for guidance on statistical principles for clinical trials (CPMP/ICH/363/96)
ICH topic E10 – Note for guidance on choice of control group in clinical trials (Guideline on the choice of the non-inferiority margin (CPMP/EWP/2158/99)
Points to consider on switching between superiority and non-inferiority (CPMP/EWP/482/99)
Note for guidance of bioavailability and bioequivalence (CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98, rev 1 corr *)

This reflection paper is intended to assist in the generation of relevant quality, non-clinical and clinical data to support a marketing authorisation of intravenous liposomal products developed with reference to an innovator liposomal product. Hence, this document should facilitate a decision on the following issues:
pharmaceutical data needed as evidence of product comparability between test and reference or after changes to a liposomal product, to support comparative safety and efficacy

Necessity of pre-clinical and clinical studies (including ‘usual’ bioequivalence studies) and circumstances which may allow to waive certain studies
The principles outlined in this reflection paper might also be considered to be applicable to other novel types of “liposome-like” and vesicular products which may be under development including those to be administered by routes other than intravenous administration.



For Assistance with The Development on New Formulations Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

EMA Concept Paper on Quality of Biosimilar Proteins

EMA Concept Paper on Quality of Biosimilar Proteins

Full Text Here

The Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: quality issues (EMEA/CHMP/BWP/49348/2005) lays down the quality requirements for a biological medicinal product claiming to be similar to another one already marketed.

The current quality guideline was published in 2006, at a time where little experience was available on the registration of biological medicinal product claiming to be similar to another one already marketed. Significant experience has now been gained through Scientific Advice, Marketing Authorisation Applications and Workshops. It is recognised that the guideline needs refinements taking into account several practical considerations relating to the lifecycle (from development to product discontinuation) of similar biological medicinal products.

Manufacturers of biotechnological/biological products (i.e. respectively reference and biosimilar manufacturers) frequently make changes to manufacturing processes of products both during development and after approval. When changes are made to the manufacturing process, the manufacturer generally evaluates the relevant quality attributes of the product to demonstrate that modifications would not adversely impact the safety and efficacy of the drug product. As a consequence, such change may result in an evolution of quality profile during the product lifecycle. In the context of a biological medicinal product claiming or claimed to be similar to another one already marketed, the conclusion of a comparability exercise performed with a reference product at a given time may not hold true from the initial development of the biosimilar, through marketing authorisation, until the product’s discontinuation.

For Assistance with CMC Issues for Biosimilars Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Concept Paper on Similar Biologial Products Containing Recombinant Interferon Beta

Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Concept Paper on Similar Biological Products Containing Recombinant Interferon Beta.

Full Text Here

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS), which is particularly frequent in Europe and one of the most common causes of neurological disability in young and middle-age adults; the social and economical burden of the disease is thus considerable. Most patients (80-90%) develop the relapsing-remitting form of the disease (RRMS), which is characterised by episodes of neurological symptoms separated by periods of relative stability. About 50-70% of these patients eventually enter a phase of progressive neurological decline (secondary progressive MS) with or without superimposed relapses. The pathogenesis of the disease remains unsolved but it is believed to be predominantly an organ- or antigenic-specific autoimmune disease mediated by activated T-lymphocytes, which cross the blood brain barrier (BBB) and initiate a series of inflammatory events that result in demyelination and irreversible axonal loss.

Recombinant interferon beta (INF-β) is currently the mainstay of MS disease-modifying therapies. Endogenous human INF-β is a cytokine secreted by various cells in response to viral infection. A member of the INF type I family, it binds to its specific receptor IFNAR and regulates the transcription of hundreds of genes. The mechanism of action of INF-β in MS is not well established but it has been hypothesized that it acts as an immunomodulator by 1) interfering with T-cell activation in several ways, including downregulating the expression of Type II MHC molecules, inhibiting the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by Th1 cells, promoting the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines by Th2 cells, activating suppressor T-cells and 2) inhibiting the destruction of the BBB and the infiltration of T-cells into the CNS.

Recombinant INF-β products are currently being developed as similar to products approved in the EU. A product-class specific guidance will lay down specific (non)clinical requirements for the demonstration of similarity of two recombinant INF-β containing products through a comparability exercise.

Click Here – Drug Development Services - Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Concept Paper on Similar Biologial Products Containing Recombinant Interferon Beta

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Concept Paper on Similar Biologial Products Containing Recombinant Interferon Beta

Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Draft Concept Paper on Similar Biological Medicinal Products Containing Recombinant Follicle Stimulating Hormone

Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Draft Concept Paper on Similar Biological Medicinal Products Containing Recombinant Follicle Stimulating Hormone.

Full Text Here

Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) is a pituitary glycoprotein hormone that plays a key role in regulating reproductive function in both males and females. FSH is a heterodimeric hormone composed of two linked subunits. The alpha subunit (92 amino acids) is common to other glycoprotein hormones whereas the beta subunit (111 amino acids) is specific. Recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) is used in fertilization medicine for women, and for men to induce and maintain spermatogenesis. The guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: non-clinical and clinical issues (EMEA/CPMP/42832/05) lays down the general requirements for demonstration of the similar nature of two biological products with respect to safety and efficacy. A product class-specific guidance will lay down specific requirements for the demonstration of comparability of rhFSH-containing medicinal products with respect to safety and efficacy.
This guideline should be read in conjunction with the requirements laid down in the EU Pharmaceutical legislation and other relevant CHMP guidelines.

Click Here – Drug Development Services – Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Draft Concept Paper on Similar Biological Medicinal Products Containing Recombinant Follicle Stimulating Hormone

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Draft Concept Paper on Similar Biological Medicinal Products Containing Recombinant Follicle Stimulating Hormone

Drug Regulators Publish Reflection Paper – Development of Similar Interferon Alfa

The Drug Regulator, EMEA, has published Guidance on developing Generic Interferon Alfa

The EMEA, published a reflection paper on the Non-Clinical and Clinical Development of Similar Medicinal Products Containing Recombinant Interferon Alfa.  in 2007, and has re-published the document on their website again.

This reflection paper lays down considerations on the non-clinical and clinical development of recombinant Interferon alfa-containing medicinal products claiming to be similar to another such product already authorised. Human interferon-alfa 2a or 2b are well-known and characterized proteins consisting of 165 amino acids. The non-glycosylated protein has a molecular weight of approx. 19,240 D. It contains two disulfide bonds, one between the cysteine residues 1 and 98, and the other between the cysteine residues 29 and 138. The sequence contains potential O-glycosylation sites. Physico-chemical and biological methods are available for characterisation of the proteins.

Recombinant Interferon Alfa 2a or 2b is approved in a wide variety of conditions such as viral hepatitis B and C, leukaemia, lymphoma, renal cell carcinoma and multiple myeloma. The sub-types Interferons alfa 2a and 2b have different clinical uses. IFN-alfa is used alone or in combination. Interferon alfa may have several pharmacodynamic effects. The relative importance of these effects in the different therapeutic indications is unknown. In general, interferon-alfa 2a or 2b use in oncology indications has reduced considerably and been superseded by other treatments.

Scope

This product specific reflection paper presents the current view of the CHMP on the non-clinical and clinical data for demonstration of comparability of two recombinant, on-pegylated, Interferon alfa containing medicinal products and should be read in conjunction with the requirements laid down in the EU Pharmaceutical legislation and other relevant CHMP guidelines (see References).

Non-Clinical Studies

Before initiating clinical development, non-clinical studies should be performed. These studies would be comparative in nature and designed to detect differences in the pharmaco-toxicological response between the similar Interferon alfa and the reference Interferon alfa and not just assess the response per se. The approach taken will need to be fully justified in the non-clinical overview.

Pharmacodynamics Studies

In order to compare differences in biological activity between the similar and the reference medicinal product, data from a number of comparative bioassays could be provided.

To support the comparability exercise for the sought clinical indications, the pharmacodynamic activity of the similar and the reference medicinal product could be quantitatively compared in an appropriate pharmacodynamic animal model, a suitable animal tumour model OR a suitable animal antiviral model.

Toxicological Studies

Data from at least one repeat dose toxicity study in a relevant species should be considered (for example, human Interferon alfa may show activity in the Syrian golden hamster). The study duration should be at least 4 weeks. Data on local tolerance in at least one species should be provided in accordance with the “Note for guidance on non-clinical local tolerance testing of medicinal products” (CPMP/SWP/2145/00).

Clinical Studies

Pharmacokinetic Studies

The pharmacokinetic properties of the similar and the reference medicinal product could be compared in single dose crossover studies using subcutaneous and intravenous administration in healthy volunteers. The recommended primary pharmacokinetic parameter is AUC and the secondary parameters are Cmax and T1/2 or CL/F.

Pharmacodynamic Studies

There are a number of PD markers, such as β2 microglobulin, neopterin and serum 2´, 5´-oligoadenylate synthetase activity, which are relevant to the interaction between Interferon -alfa and the immune system. The selected doses should be in the linear ascending part of the dose-response curve. Whereas the relative importance of these effects in the different therapeutic indications is unknown a comprehensive comparative evaluation of such markers following administration of test and reference products could provide useful supporting data.

Efficacy

Patient Population

The mechanism of action of interferon comprises of several different unrelated effects. Demonstration of similar efficacy between test and reference products is required. This could be performed in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) as delineated by the indication for the reference product. Other patient population(s) might be studied depending on the indications desired.

Study Design and Duration

A randomised, parallel group comparison against the reference product over at least 48 weeks is recommended. If possible, the study should be double-blind at least until data to complete the primary analysis have been generated. If this is not feasible, justification should be provided and efforts to reduce/eliminate bias should be clearly identified in the protocol.

Endpoints

Primary: Virologic response as measured by the proportion of patients with undetectable levels of HCV RNA by quantitative PCR at week 12. The assay used to measure HCV RNA and the cut-off applied should be justified. A 2-log decrease in viral load may be a co-primary endpoint. Secondary: virologic response at week 4 and end-of-treatment; sustained virologic response (24 weeks after completion of treatment); change in liver biochemistry including transaminase levels and morbidity.

Safety

Safety data should be collected from patients after repeated dosing in a comparative clinical trial over the treatment period plus 24 weeks of follow-up. The number of patients should be sufficient for the comparative evaluation of the adverse effect profile. Laboratory abnormalities for immune mediated disorders should be included. The safety profile should be similar to the reference products for the common adverse events (such as flu-like illness, alopecia, myalgia, leucopenia, anaemia and thrombocytopenia).

Immunogenicity

Comparative immunogenicity data (antibody levels) should be presented during the treatment period plus 24 weeks of follow-up according to the principles described in the “Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: nonclinical and clinical issues” (EMEA/CPMP/42832/05/) and the “Guideline on immunogenicity assessment of biotechnology-derived therapeutic proteins” (EMEA/CHMP/BMWP/14327/2006).

Extrapolation of Evidence

In principle extrapolation from one therapeutic indication to another is appropriate where the mechanism of action and/or the receptor are known to be the same as the condition(s) for which similarity in efficacy has been established. If indication(s) are sought, where the mechanism of action is not known to be the same, such extrapolation
should be adequately justified.

Pharamcovigilance Plans

Within the authorisation procedure the applicant should present a risk management programme/pharmacovigilance plan in accordance with current EU legislation and pharmacovigilance guidelines. Attention should be paid to immunogenicity and potentially rare and/or delayed serious adverse events, especially in patients undergoing chronic administration. Safety should be collected from patients representing all approved indications.

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators Publish Reflection Paper   Development of Similar Interferon Alfa

Grow your Expertise for Free

As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

This guideline ap
recombinant vaccines for the prevention and treatment of infectious disease, and provides guidance on quality, non-clinical and clinical aspects.