Tag Archives: Clinical Trials

How readable are clinical trial consent forms and information sheets?

article by associates consultant Mark Gibson

Normally, subject participation in clinical trials is dependent on the trial sponsor obtaining informed consent from each participant. Study Information Sheets and Consent Forms are frequently the only pieces of information upon which potential participants can base their informed consent. In a typical study, the Information Sheet would occupy around 95% of the written information given to participants and the consent form may only take up one or two sides of A4. The clearer, the more concise and the more understandable these documents are, the more the participant consent is truly ‘informed’. This article discusses what is required by legislation in the USA and the EU for Information Sheet and Consent Form documentation. It is also explores the scope for consumer evaluation of clinical trial documentation aimed at patients.

Full article available upon request

 

FDA Publish Guidance on Clinical Trial Imaging Endpoints

FDA Publish Guidance on Clinical Trial Imaging Endpoints

Full Text Here

The purpose of this guidance is to assist sponsors in the use of endpoints that depend on the results of imaging tests in clinical trials of therapeutic drugs and biological products. This guidance focuses on the imaging standards that we regard as important when imaging is used to assess a primary endpoint, or an endpoint component, in a clinical trial intended to confirm a drug’s efficacy. These standards can be used by sponsors to ensure that the imaging data are obtained in a manner that complies with a trial’s protocol, that the quality of imaging data is maintained within and among clinical sites, and that there is a verifiable record of the imaging process. By considering the topics highlighted within this guidance, sponsors can obtain clinical trial imaging data in a manner that minimizes variability and enhances data quality and the ability to detect drug treatment effects.

This guidance describes the procedures recommended for collecting and interpreting medical images in efficacy trials. The guidance does not address whether or not specific measurements are clinically meaningful and are acceptable for drug approval. Even though many of the concepts within this guidance also can be applied to clinical trials of 35 diagnostic products and devices, those clinical trials often involve more technical considerations. We encourage sponsors to consult guidances directed toward those types of products. For considerations involving development of imaging drugs, see the guidance for industry Developing Medical Imaging Drug and Biological Products (Parts 1, 2, and 3).

As part of the reauthorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA 4), we committed to certain performance goals (see letters from the Secretary of Health and Human Services to the Chairman of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate and the Chairman of the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives, as set forth in the Congressional Record). This draft guidance addresses one of these goals with the creation of a guidance document that addresses the “imaging standards for use as an endpoint in clinical trials.” Although this guidance addresses imaging standards, it does not address the use of any specific imaging endpoints nor does it address a process of qualification of imaging biomarkers for use in clinical drug development. For issues that may be relevant to such a process, see the draft guidance for industry Qualification Process for Drug Development Tools.


For Assistance with Designing Clinical Trials Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

EMA Publish Concept Paper on Clinical Investigations of Multiple Sclerosis

EMA Publish Concept Paper on Clinical Investigations of Multiple Sclerosis

Full Text Here

The increase in applications of new products in the treatment of multiple sclerosis and numerous scientific advices given concerning multiple sclerosis indicates that the treatment of multiple sclerosis is a moving and changing field. In addition the current treatment options have changed the multiple sclerosis population.
In the discussions mostly the same items, as stated in the problem statement below, are subject of debate. New treatment options e.g. immunosuppressants prompt to reconsideration of treatment targets, target population, trial design, choice of endpoints, among others. In the dawn of treatments intended to improve residual impairment, the design of clinical trials for specific symptomatic improvement needs discussion. In addition, the current guidance lacks recommendations with respect to data needed in the paediatric population.

Hence several additions and changes in this guideline as well a reconsideration/reconfirmation of existing principles are needed.



For Assistance with Clinical Development in Multiple Sclerosis Planning and Regulations Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

EMA Seeks Expression of Interest in Workshop on Ethics of Children in Clinical Trials

EMA Seeks Expression of Interest in Workshop on Ethics of Children in Clinical Trials

Full Text Here

The European Medicines Agency is inviting expressions of interest for its workshop on the ethical considerations for paediatric trials, taking place at the Agency on 29-30 November 2011.

Expressions of interest are welcome from people with a scientific background or paediatric experience of ethics committees, paediatric research networks, the pharmaceutical industry or contract research organisations.

The meeting will bring together members of ethics committees assessing paediatric trials, the Agency’s Paediatric Committee (PDCO) and methodology experts from the European regulatory network.

It will enable:

  • the exchange of experience and views on ethical questions in the design of paediatric trials and assessment of the ethical aspects of paediatric trials;
  • the exploration of ways to collaborate and share information;
  • discussion of how the PDCO requests paediatric trials;
  • the exploration of opportunities for the safeguard of children by ethics committees and the European regulatory network, while fostering excellence in the development of medicines for children.

For more detailed information and to express interest in participating, please contact Dr Ralf Herold.



For Assistance with Paediatric Clinical Development Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

EMA Publish Paper on Need for Revision of Guidelines on Development of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis

EMA Publish Paper on Need for Revision of Guidelines on Development of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis

Full Text Here

The increase in applications of new products in the treatment of multiple sclerosis and numerous scientific advices given concerning multiple sclerosis indicates that the treatment of multiple sclerosis is a moving and changing field. In addition the current treatment options have changed the multiple sclerosis population.
In the discussions mostly the same items, as stated in the problem statement below, are subject of debate. New treatment options e.g. immunosuppressants prompt to reconsideration of treatment targets, target population, trial design, choice of endpoints, among others. In the dawn of treatments intended to improve residual impairment, the design of clinical trials for specific symptomatic improvement needs discussion. In addition, the current guidance lacks recommendations with respect to data needed in the paediatric population.
Hence several additions and changes in this guideline as well a reconsideration/reconfirmation of existing principles are needed.The current guideline is not entirely up to date and should cover the latest scientific developments with regard to treatment targets; patient population and defining what kind of data are needed in children and adolescents.



For Assistance with Clinical Development Planning Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

EMA annouce meeting on Ethics for Paediatric Tirals

EMA annouce meeting on Ethics for Paediatric Tirals

Full Text Here

This two-day workshop is on ethical aspects of the design and conduct of clinical trials with the paediatric population for medicine development. It is aimed at ethics committee members assessing paediatric trials, European regulators including methodology experts and participants with a scientific background or paediatric experience from ethics committees, paediatric research networks, pharmaceutical companies or contract research organisations. Registration open until 01/11/2011. Places limited.



For Assistance with PIPs and Wavers Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

FDA Publishes Guidance on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clinical Trail Endpoints

FDA Publishes Guidance on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clinical Trail Endpoints

Full Text Here

The purpose of this guidance is to provide recommendations to applicants on endpoints for non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) clinical trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to support effectiveness claims in new drug applications (NDAs), biologics license applications (BLAs), or supplemental applications. This guidance is a companion to the guidance for industry Clinical Trial Endpoints for the Approval of Cancer Drugs and Biologics. This guidance addresses the FDA’s current thinking regarding efficacy endpoints in trials evaluating treatments for lung cancer and considers discussions held at a public workshop (April 15, 2003) and at a meeting of the FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) (December 16, 2003). This guidance does not address efficacy endpoints for drugs intended to prevent or decrease the incidence of lung cancer. As the scientific understanding of this disease evolves, this guidance may be revised.

This guidance also does not contain discussion of the general issues of clinical trial design or statistical analysis. Those topics are addressed in the ICH guidances for industry E9 Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials and E10 Choice of Control Group and Related Issues in Clinical Trials. This guidance focuses on specific drug development and trial design issues that are unique to the study of lung cancer.

For Assistance with Developing Clinical and Regulatory Strategies for Oncology Products Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

FDA Publish Guidance on Postmarketing Studies and Clinical Trials

FDA Publish Guidance on Post-marketing Studies and Clinical Trials

Full Text Here

This guidance provides information on the implementation of new section 505(o) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) (21 U.S.C. 355(o)), added by section 901 of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA). Section 505(o)(3) authorizes FDA to require certain postmarketing studies and clinical trials2 for prescription drugs approved under section 505 of the Act and biological products approved under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (the PHS Act) (42 U.S.C. 262).3 This guidance provides information about the requirements for postmarketing studies and clinical trials under section 505(o)(3) of the Act. The guidance also describes the types of postmarketing studies and clinical trials that:
● will generally be required under the new legislation (postmarketing requirements (PMRs)) and

● will generally be agreed-upon commitments (postmarketing commitments (PMCs)) because they do not meet the new statutory criteria for required postmarketing studies and clinical trials.
Section 901 of FDAAA also created new sections 505-1 and 505(o)(4) of the Act, which authorize FDA, under certain circumstances, to require risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) to ensure that the benefits outweigh the risks of a drug and safety-related labeling changes (SLC) respectively.4 This guidance does not address REMS and SLC provisions. FDA wishes to clarify that PMRs, REMS, and SLCs are required under separate sections of the Act and while all are intended to address serious safety risks, they are separate provisions that have different goals and must meet separately defined statutory criteria. REMS are not a special type of PMR, nor are PMRs elements of a REMS.5
This guidance does not apply to nonprescription drugs approved under a new drug application (NDA), nor does it apply to generic drugs approved under section 505(j) of the Act. Section 505(o) of the Act applies only to prescription drugs approved under section 505(b) of the Act and biological products approved under section 351 of the PHS Act. See 505(o)(2)(B).

For Assistance with Getting Clinical Trials Approved Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

MHRA Publish Guidance on Clinical Trials for Devices

MHRA Publish Guidance on Clinical Trials for Devices

These Notes outline the legal requirements relating to the conduct and performance of a clinical investigation as set out in these Regulations. They also provide background and guidance to manufacturers on how to apply for pre-clinical assessment of a proposed clinical investigation in human subjects, involving a device falling within the scope of the Regulations.

Manufacturers wishing to make an application for pre-clinical assessment of a proposed clinical investigation of an active implantable medical device or a medical device to be carried out in part or in whole in the UK should apply to the Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency of the Department of Health (referred to in this document as the UK Competent Authority), in accordance with these Guidance Notes.

This guidance is intended as a general explanation of the legislation and should not be regarded as an authoritative statement of the law nor as having any legal consequence. It follows that manufacturers and others should not rely solely on this guidance but should consult the legislation referred to and make their own decisions on matters affecting them in conjunction with their lawyers and other professional advisers. The MHRA does not accept liability for any errors, omissions or other statements in the guidance whether negligent or otherwise. An authoritative statement could
be given only by the courts. Information and assistance in individual cases may be sought from the UK Competent Authority whose address and telephone number are given on pages 12 – 13 of this document.

For Assistance with the development of a medical device Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

FDA Guidance, Assay For Immunogenicity Testing of Proteins

FDA Guidance, Assay For Immunogenicity Testing of Proteins

Full text Here

This guidance provides recommendations to facilitate industry’s development of immune assays for assessment of the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins during clinical trials. This document includes guidance for binding assays, neutralizing assays, and confirmatory assays. While the document does not specifically discuss the development of immune assays for animal studies, the concepts discussed are relevant to the qualification and validation of immune studies for preclinical evaluation of data.

This document does not discuss the product and patient risk factors that may contribute to immune response rates (immunogenicity).

In addition, this document does not specifically discuss how results obtained from immunoassays relate to follow-on biologic therapeutic proteins. However, elements of assay validation may affect comparability determinations of immune responses. FDA guidance documents, including this guidance, do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the Agency’s current thinking on a topic and should be viewed only as recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are cited. The use of the word should in Agency guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but not required.

For Assistance Developing Biotech Products Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

EMA Draft Guidance on Statistical Principles for Veterinary Clinical Trials.

EMA Draft Guidance on Statistical Principles for Veterinary Clinical Trials.

Full Text Here

This revised note is intended to provide guidance on the statistical principles to be considered in the design, conduct, analysis and evaluation of clinical trials to demonstrate efficacy and/or safety of an investigational veterinary pharmaceutical product in animals. The guideline is basically similar to its counterpart in human medicine (Note for Guidance on Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials, CPMP/ICH/363/96) and addresses, in addition, specific veterinary issues. A number of issues relating to hypothesis testing (superiority, non-inferiority), confidence intervals for response variables, power calculations and other statistical methods have been identified by regulators in the recent years that would need more clear guidance. Therefore the guideline has been updated accordingly.

MHRA, The UK Drug Regulator, Pubilshes Guidance for Manufactures on Clinical Investigations To Be Carried Out in the UK

MHRA, The UK Drug Regulator, Publishes Guidance for Manufactures on Clinical Investigations To Be Carried Out in the UK.

Full Text Here

1. The Medical Devices Regulations 2002 (SI No 618), as amended by the Medical Devices (Amendment) Regulations 2008, came into force on 13 June 2002 and implement the provisions of the Medical Devices Directive 93/42/EEC (as amended by Directive 2007/47/EC), the Active Implantable Medical Devices Directive 90/385/EEC (as amended by Directive 2007/47/EC) and the In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Directive 98/79/EEC. These Regulations establish systems under which a manufacturer must submit to the UK Competent Authority, information about clinical investigations of medical devices to be carried out in the UK. 2. These Notes outline the legal  requirements relating to the conduct and performance of a clinical investigation as set out in these Regulations. They also provide background and guidance to manufacturers on how to apply for pre-clinical assessment of a proposed clinical investigation in human subjects, involving a device falling within the scope of the
Regulations.

3. Manufacturers wishing to make an application for pre-clinical assessment of a proposed clinical investigation of an active implantable medical device or a medical device to be carried out in part or in whole in the UK should apply to the Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency of the Department of Health (referred to in this document as the UK Competent Authority), in accordance with these Guidance Notes.

4. This guidance is intended as a general explanation of the legislation and should not be regarded as an authoritative statement of the law nor as having any legal consequence. It follows that manufacturers and others should not rely solely on this guidance but should consult the legislation referred to and make their own decisions on matters affecting them in conjunction with their lawyers and other professional advisers. The MHRA does not accept liability for any errors, omissions or other statements in the guidance whether negligent or otherwise. An authoritative statement could be given only by the courts. Information and assistance in individual cases may be sought from the UK Competent Authority whose address and telephone number are given on pages 12 – 13 of this document.

For Regulatory Services Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

EMA, The European Drug Regualtor, Publishes Draft Reflection Paper on Ethical and GCP Aspects of Clinical Trial of Medical Products for Human use Conducted in Third Countries and Submitted in Marketing Authoirsation Application to the EMA

EMA, The European Drug Regualtor, Publishes Draft Reflection Paper on Ethical and GCP Aspects of Clinical Trial of Medical Products for Human use Conducted in Third Countries and Submitted in Marketing Authoirsation Application to the EMA.

Full Text Here

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is a decentralised body of the European Union. Its main responsibility is the protection and promotion of public and animal health, through the evaluation and supervision of medicines for human and veterinary use. The EMA is responsible for the scientific evaluation of applications for European marketing authorisation for medicinal products (centralised procedure). The EMA provides the Member States and the institutions of the EU the best-possible scientific advice on any question relating to the evaluation of the quality, safety and efficacy of medicinal products for human or veterinary use referred to it in accordance with the provisions of EU legislation relating to medicinal products. In addition article 58 of Regulation (EC) No. 726/2004 provides that the European Medicines Agency can give a scientific opinion, in the context of cooperation with the WHO, for the evaluation of certain medicinal products for human use intended exclusively for markets outside the EU. Such opinions are drawn up by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), following a review of the Quality, Safety and Efficacy data, analogous to the review undertaken via the centralised procedure, after consultation with the WHO. The standards applicable to both types of application (MAA or Article 58 Opinion) are the same and set out in Annex 1 to Directive 2001/83/EC.

In the context of this document the term “Third Countries” means countries that are not member states of the European Union/European Economic Area (EEA).

The revisions to the pharmaceutical legislation which came into place in 2004 increased emphasis on the ethical standards required of clinical trials conducted outside the European Economic Area (EEA) and included in Marketing Authorisation Applications (MAAs) submitted in the EEA for medicinal products for human use. The number of patients recruited in countries outside of the EEA is substantial (http://www.ema.europa.eu/Inspections/GCPgeneral.html). Some clinical trials are conducted across several regions, including Europe, whereas many others are conducted solely outside of the EEA.

Regulation (EC) No EC/726/2004 states in recital 16: “There is also a need to provide for the ethical requirements of Directive 2001/20/EC of 4 April 2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use to apply to medicinal products authorised by the Community. In particular, with respect to clinical trials conducted outside the Community on medicinal products destined to be authorised within the Community, at the time of the evaluation of the application for authorisation, it should be verified that these trials were conducted in accordance with the principles of good clinical practice and the ethical requirements equivalent to the provisions of the said Directive.”

Paragraph §8 of the Preamble – Introduction and General Principles of Annex 1 to Directive 2001/83/EC states: “All clinical trials, conducted within the European Community, must comply with the requirements of Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. To be taken into account during the assessment of an application, clinical trials, conducted outside the European Community, which relate to medicinal products intended to be used in the European Community, shall be designed, implemented and reported on what good clinical practice and ethical principles are concerned, on the basis of principles, which are equivalent to the provisions of Directive 2001/20/EC. Theyshall be carried out in accordance with the ethical principles that are reflected, for example, in the Declaration of Helsinki.”

Actions to meet this objective therefore need to encmpass EMA processes having an impact on clinical trials commencing prior to early phase clinical development. These processes include development of guidelines, Scientific Advice, Orphan Product Designation and Paediatric Investigation Plans and continue through to the finalisation of the CHMP opinion on the MAA, and post-authorisation activities.
In Dec 2008 the EMA published a strategy paper “Acceptance of clinical trials conducted in third countries for evaluation in Marketing Authorisation Applications” (http://www.ema.europa.eu/ Inspections/docs/22806708en.pdf) outlining four areas for action. These are:

1) Clarify the practical application of ethical standards for clinical trials, in the context of European  Medicines Agency activities.

2.) Determine the practical steps undertaken during the provision of guidance and advice in the drug development phase.

3) Determine the practical steps to be undertaken during the Marketing Authorisation phase

4.) International cooperation in the regulation of clinical trials, their review and inspection and capacity building in this area.

In 2009 the EMA established a Working Group on third country clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. This working Group has been asked to develop practical proposals for tasks and procedures or guidance to address the four action areas set out above. The present document reflects the results of the discussion of this Working Group.
The best approach to achieving these objectives is to ensure that a robust framework exists for the oversight and conduct of clinical trials, no matter where in the world the clinical investigators’ sites are located and patients recruited. An international network of regulators from all countries involved, working together to share best practices, experiences and information and working to standards agreed and recognized by all, can provide an effective platform for such a robust framework. The EMA will seek to build and extend its relationship with regulators in all part of the world and with international organisations in order to work to achieve this.
The Reflection Paper highlights and emphasizes the need for cooperation between Regulatory Authorities involved in the supervision of clinical trials and the need to extend and link networks to support these activities.
The specific scope of this Reflection Paper extends to clinical trials conducted in third countries and submitted in marketing authorisation applications to the EMA in respect of medicinal products for human use.

Clincal Trials Services

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Draft Guidance for Industry, Non-Inferiority Clinical Trials

Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Draft Guidance for Industry, Non-Inferiority Clinical Trials

Full Text Here

This guidance provides sponsors and review staff in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and Center for Biologic Evaluation and Research (CBER) at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with our interpretation of the underlying principles involved in the use of non-inferiority (NI) study designs to provide evidence of the effectiveness of a drug or biologic. The guidance gives advice on when NI studies can be interpretable, on how to choose the NI margin, and how to analyze the results.

This guidance consists of four parts. The first part is a general discussion of regulatory, study design, scientific, and statistical issues associated with the use of non-inferiority studies when these are used to establish the effectiveness of a new drug. The second part focuses on some of these issues in more detail, notably the quantitative analytical and statistical approaches used to determine the non-inferiority margin for use in NI studies, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of available methods. The third part addresses commonly asked questions about NI studies and provides practical advice about various approaches.  The fourth part includes five examples of successful and unsuccessful efforts to define non inferiority margins and conduct NI studies.

Clinical Development Planning Services

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulattions, rules and initiatives each month, and summarise them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Draft Guidance for Industry, Non Inferiority Clinical Trials

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Draft Guidance for Industry, Non Inferiority Clinical Trials

Drug Regulators, FDA, CDER, Publish Draft Guidance on Assay Development for Immunogenicity Testing of Therapeutic Proteins

Drug Regulators, FDA, CDER, Publish Draft Guidance on Assay Development for Immunogenicity Testing of Therapeutic Proteins

Full Text Here

This guidance provides recommendations to facilitate industry’s development of immune assays for assessment of the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins during clinical trials. This document includes guidance for binding assays, neutralizing assays, and confirmatory assays. While the document does not specifically discuss the development of immune assays for animal studies, the concepts discussed are relevant to the qualification and validation of immune studies for preclinical evaluation of data.

This document does not discuss the product and patient risk factors that may contribute to immune response rates (immunogenicity).

In addition, this document does not specifically discuss how results obtained from immunoassays relate to follow-on biologic therapeutic proteins. However, elements of assay validation may affect comparability determinations of immune responses. FDA guidance documents, including this guidance, do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the Agency’s current thinking on a topic and should be viewed only as recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are cited. The use of the word should in Agency guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but not required.

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free.

As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

First name

E-mail address

This guideline ap
recombinant vaccines for the prevention and treatment of infectious disease, and provides guidance on quality, non-clinical and clinical aspects.
ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, FDA, CDER, Publish Draft Guidance on Assay Development for Immunogenicity Testing of Therapeutic Proteins

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, FDA, CDER, Publish Draft Guidance on Assay Development for Immunogenicity Testing of Therapeutic Proteins

Turn your Business Into an Investor Magnet

How to Write a Business Plan – Free E-Course

Get the secrets that turns your project into an investment magnet, 100% of our clients raise the finance they need to take their projects to the next stage, we will share these secrets with you. – Sign up for Free

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

US Senate Votes to Improve Drug Trial Access

Clinical Trial Access Improved by US Senate

just read an interesting article on www.Pharmaceutical-Technology.com

Four members of the US senate have introduced legislation to improve access to clinical trials for patients with rare diseases.

The “Improving Access to Clinical Trials Act” will allow patients with rare diseases to participate in clinical drug studies without losing their eligibility for public healthcare.

At present patients are prevented from accepting research compensation from clinical trials as it would make them ineligible to receive government medical benefits.

The move would also benefit researchers who often struggle to recruit patients with rare diseases such as cystic fibrosis due to limited patient populations and patient unwillingness to risk losing government support.

US Senator Ron Wyden said that for many suffering from rare diseases, access to clinical trials is their best hope for treatment.

“This legislation will make sure the small financial incentives these people receive will not be counted against them,” Wyden said.

The Improving Access to Clinical Trials Act is co-sponsored by Senators Ron Wyden (D-OR), Chris Dodd (D-CT), James Inhofe (R-OK) and Richard Shelby (R-AL).

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes US Senate Votes to Improve Drug Trial Access

Turn your Business Into an Investor Magnet

How to Write a Business Plan – Free E-Course

Get the secrets that turns your project into an investment magnet, 100% of our clients raise the finance they need to take their projects to the next stage, we will share these secrets with you. – Sign up for Free

Grow your Expertise for Free

As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

First name

E-mail address

This guideline ap
recombinant vaccines for the prevention and treatment of infectious disease, and provides guidance on quality, non-clinical and clinical aspects.
ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 US Senate Votes to Improve Drug Trial Access

Drug Regulators Publish Guidance on the Investigation of Medicincal Products in the Term and Preterm Neonate

EMEA CHMP Publishes Guidance on the Investigation of Medicinal Products in the Term and Preterm Neonate.

Full Guidance Here

Neonates are the group of children from birth up to and including the age of 27 days, including term and preterm neonates. They represent a particularly vulnerable subgroup of the paediatric population. Whilst they account for a low percentage of the total use of medicines in childhood, up to 90 % of medicinal products are used unauthorised or off-label in this population, especially if treated on Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs).
There are several reasons as to why few clinical trials of medicinal products have been performed in neonates (e.g. feasibility difficulties linked to: age, small patient group and uniqueness of their diseases.) The Regulation on Medicinal Products for Paediatric Use (Regulation (EC) 1901/2006) creates obligations with regards to conducting clinical trials in paediatric patients including neonates in order to meet the recognised need for authorised medicinal products and the information on the use of medicinal products in children. Therefore clinical trials to investigate medicinal products in the neonatal population have to address the needs of this population.
Neonatal studies encompass multiple difficulties, such as ethical (high vulnerability) and technical issues (immaturity, prematurity, lack of self assessment, need for specific formulations, high variability, etc). Notwithstanding the difficulties, the standards of the trials should remain the same.

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators Publish Guidance on the Investigation of Medicincal Products in the Term and Preterm Neonate

Turn your Business Into an Investor Magnet

How to Write a Business Plan – Free E-Course

Get the secrets that turns your project into an investment magnet, 100% of our clients raise the finance they need to take their projects to the next stage, we will share these secrets with you. – Sign up for Free

Grow your Expertise for Free

As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

First name

E-mail address

This guideline ap
recombinant vaccines for the prevention and treatment of infectious disease, and provides guidance on quality, non-clinical and clinical aspects.
ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators Publish Guidance on the Investigation of Medicincal Products in the Term and Preterm Neonate

Drug Development Guidance – EMEA for Medical Products for Term and Preterm Neonates

Drug Development Guidance Published by EMEA on New Medicinal Products for Term and Pre-term Neonates

EMEA publishes “GUIDELINE ON THE INVESTIGATION OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS IN THE TERM AND PRETERM NEONATE”. This guideline addresses the considerations and requirements for the design and conduct of clinical trials in premature and term neonates using medicinal products of relevance for the use by this population. It includes background information on the maturation of organs and of body functions.

Introduction to EMEA Guidelines

Neonates are the group of children from birth up to and including the age of 27 days, including term and preterm neonates. They represent a particularly vulnerable subgroup of the paediatric population. Whilst they account for a low percentage of the total use of medicines in childhood, up to 90 % of medicinal products are used unauthorised or off-label in this population, especially if treated on Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs).

There are several reasons as to why few clinical trials of medicinal products have been performed in neonates (e.g. feasibility difficulties linked to: age, small patient group and uniqueness of their diseases.) The Regulation on Medicinal Products for Paediatric Use (Regulation (EC) 1901/2006) creates obligations with regards to conducting clinical trials in paediatric patients including neonates in order to meet the recognised need for authorised medicinal products and the information on the use of medicinal products in children. Therefore clinical trials to investigate medicinal products in the neonatal population have to address the needs of this population (section 9.1).

Scope of EMEA Guidance

The guideline aims to provide guidance for the development of medicinal products for use in the neonatal period, defined as from birth up to 27 days post-natal age in term neonates and from birth up to a post-menstrual age of 40 weeks and 27 days in preterm neonates.

Organ Maturation in the Neonate

Most organ functions are physiologically immature in the neonatal period. The degree of immaturity may be aggravated due to prematurity, intrauterine growth retardation or any potential pathologic condition affecting the neonate. Functional immaturity of physiological processes and organ function predispose neonates to altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, leading to potential inefficacy or reduced safety of a medicinal product in the neonate.

Maturational changes are rapid in the post-natal period, and the resulting high variability of the neonates (both inter-individually and intra-individually) has to be considered when investigating medicinal products for use in the neonatal population. Additionally, any medicinal product administered to the neonate may affect the ongoing maturation processes. Major developmental changes should be identified that could significantly influence exposure, safety and efficacy for a given medicinal product. If adequate and possible, not only pharmacokinetic changes due to ongoing maturation but also pharmacodynamic changes as a function of maturation itself should be investigated.

Heart and Lung

The post-natal cardiopulmonary system adaptation marks the most prominent changes during and after birth. Some of these changes occur instantaneous with the first breath, whereas others occur within hours or days after birth. In general, the impact of lung and heart maturation on PK/PD relationship (e.g., closure of the ductus arteriosus) has to be considered.

Cardiopulmonary monitoring of hospitalised neonates is carried out on a routine basis and these findings should be used and documented for the purpose of a clinical trial as appropriate. Less or non-invasive measures should be used whenever possible (e.g., measurement of blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory excursions and rate; pulse oximetry in at least one site, transcutaneous pO2 and / or pCO2 measuring, electrocardiogram [ECG], echocardiography, and Doppler sonography). Radiologic (e.g. X-ray, MRI) and laboratory (e.g., blood gases, haematocrit) assessments may additionally be required and would need to be synchronised with routine assessments and limited as much as possible.

Central Nervous System (CNS)

Critical processes of brain development consist of neuronal proliferation, migration, organisation and myelination. Two main phases can be distinguished with the first occurring between the 8th and 16th week of gestation, consisting of neuronal proliferation and generation of radial glia, and the second phase between 5 months and 1 year of life, consisting of glial multiplication (with neurogenesis and neuroproliferation continuing).

Even if a medicinal product is not primarily developed for an indication related to the CNS, the distribution and penetration into the CNS and the potential effects and neuro-developmental sequelae should be addressed.

Hypoglycemia is an important risk factor for perinatal brain injury. Due to the high metabolic rate and the dependence on glucose as unique source of energy of the brain, any medicinal product affecting glucose metabolism in the neonate may have an effect on the developing brain. This should be carefully taken into consideration when planning a neonatal study.

Measures to monitor brain function include EEG (electroencephalography), amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG), ultrasonography, Doppler sonography, auditory and visual evoked potential measurements (AEP, VEP), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), (functional) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). These measures have different utility, e.g. NIRS allows to continuously assess brain perfusion and oxygen consumption in neonates.

Kidney and Renal Function

Renal clearance mechanisms include glomerular filtration (GFR), tubular secretion and reabsorption. Glomerular filtration matures faster than the tubular function, and both depend not only on age and maturational status but also on adverse factors occurring in the pre- and post-natal period, including for example intrauterine growth retardation or administration of nephrotoxic drugs to the mother and the neonate.

Serum creatinine is elevated in the first days of life and reflects maternal creatinine and low GFR in the neonate. In premature neonates, the persistence of an elevated serum creatinine during the first weeks of life is the result of a transitory process of tubular creatinine reabsorption. Therefore, to monitor renal function serum creatinine is used after the first week of life in term neonates and after 4 weeks in premature neonates. Before these times, intra-individual changes (related to post-menstrual age) in serum creatinine are used as a guide to renal function.

Liver and Hepatic Function

Hepatic blood flow, plasma protein binding and intrinsic clearance determining hepatic clearance undergo significant post-natal changes. Most enzymatic microsomal systems responsible for drug metabolism are present at birth and their activities increase with advancing post-natal and gestational age. Rapid maturational changes occur during the first weeks of life. Hepatic clearance may be influenced by premature birth, pathologic conditions of the neonate or administration of drugs to the mother or to the neonate.

To predict the exact nature of these consequences requires an understanding of post-natal maturation and main involved enzymes. The ontogeny of specific enzymes is partly described in the scientific literature and may allow estimations of drug metabolism in the neonate. These data should be considered when planning neonatal studies.

If the medicinal product investigated is likely to be eliminated mainly through hepatic metabolism, markers of reduced/normal hepatic function could be included as covariates in the pharmacokinetic data analysis (e.g., in population PK analysis) as well as included in the safety assessment. Monitoring could include standard laboratory and imaging procedures.

Gastrointestinal System

Data concerning maturational changes of the neonatal gastrointestinal tract that may influence bioavailability are still limited.

Immune System

Lymphoid stem cells develop from precursors and differentiate into T, B or NK cells, as well as Antigen presenting cells (APCs) depending on the organs or tissues to which the stem cells traffic. Indeed, both the initial organogenesis and the continued immune system cell differentiation occur as a consequence of the interaction of a vast array of lymphocytic and microenviromental cell surface molecules and proteins secreted by the involved cells. De novo T-cell generation requires a functional thymus. The current paradigm is that the human T-cell repertoire is established during late foetal development and that, by the time of birth, thymectomy does not cause immediate immune deficiency. Thymic epithelial cells – the component of the thymus relevant for T-cell production and selection – involute rapidly after birth. Compared with adult T cells, neonatal T cells secrete increased levels of interleukin-10 (IL-10) following stimulation, but reduced levels of many other cytokines, including IL-2, IL-4, IL-8, interferon gamma (IFN-gamma), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) and tumor-necrosis factor alfa (TNF-alfa).

Antibody response can readily be detected upon challenge in neonates provided to take into account the presence of interfering maternal antibodies. Modern multiparameter cytofluorimetric technology can be employed to assess not only the number of immune cells but also some immune functions such as cytokine production or cytolytic activity. However an effort to develop microassays has to be done to truly assess the different pattern of immune responses in the neonate and in infants in the first years of life. Molecular techniques such as spectratyping for T and B cell repertoire assessment can also be of value.

Body Composition

Changes in body composition during the neonatal period are important factors for altered pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics. Body composition correlates with both gestational and post-natal age, and it continues to change significantly during the first years of life. Age related changes in fat, muscle and total body water composition may produce significant quantitative changes in pharmacokinetic parameters such as volume of distribution. For instance, total body water is highest in the newborn and decreases substantially in the first 4 months of life therefore high water soluble drugs will present a larger Volume of Distribution in the neonatal period potentially requiring larger doses than older children in order to achieve the same desired therapeutic plasma concentrations. On the contrary, the amount of body fat is low at birth and increases progressively in the first months of life. Iatrogenic interventions in neonates could also significantly shift body composition characteristics.

Conditions Affecting Specifically the Neonatal Population

Neonates frequently suffer from conditions that are specific for this subset of the paediatric population, for example respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) or patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). In addition, neonates hospitalised on NICUs often suffer from multiple concomitant conditions, requiring administration of a combination of medicinal products resulting in a high risk of drug interactions. Additionally, adverse reactions in neonates, especially in preterms may trigger specific complications, as for example in relation to susceptibility to necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) or retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). As a further complicating factor, in utero growth retardation may affect pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs at birth and therefore may change the safety and efficacy profile of drugs used in the neonatal period.

Timing of Development of Medicinal Products in Neonates

The timing of studying a medicinal product in the neonate will depend on the seriousness and uniqueness of the condition to be treated as well as on the availability of alternative treatment options, the potential benefit of a new product, and the target population. Sponsors should refer to ICH Guideline E11.

Data Required Before the First Administration to a Neonate in a Clinical Trial

If possible, clinical data should always be obtained in the least vulnerable population. Depending on the condition, the new product, the target population and further factors according to section 2.1 of the ICH Guideline E11, initial tolerability, PK and safety data should be collected in adults before initiating studies in the neonatal population.

If older children are affected by the same disease or another disease for which the medicinal product may be of use, in general older (less vulnerable) paediatric age groups should be studied before studying the product in the neonatal population.

For conditions exclusively found in neonates, the development should primarily be made in neonates. However, also in such condition, the first studies in man should, if possible, be done in healthy adult volunteers. Sponsors should refer to the ICH Guideline E11.

In-Vitro Data

In order to predict the in vivo situation as much as possible (i.e., as regards efficacy, pharmacokinetics, safety), in vitro studies on human biomaterial, (e.g., on human non-terminally differentiated cells or, if relevant, foetal or neonatal cell cultures) may provide relevant additional information. Examples include enzyme activity, receptor expression and mediator modulation.

Animal Data

The conventional nonclinical studies should be performed including pharmacokinetic, primary pharmacodynamic, safety pharmacology, single- and repeated dose toxicity, genotoxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, including peri-/post-natal toxicity testing (e.g., transplacental exposure) and local tolerance studies.

In addition to these conventional non-clinical studies, juvenile animal data should be provided if needed. Juvenile toxicity studies will be necessary if available human safety data and previous animal studies are considered insufficient for a safety evaluation in the intended paediatric age group. If such studies are considered to be not relevant or not feasible, a scientifically data based justification should be provided.

Formulation and Route of Administration

The choice of formulation and route of administration depend on the condition to be treated and the clinical state of the neonate. Age-appropriate formulations and strengths using appropriate excipients must be developed to avoid extemporaneous preparations, even more so for neonates. Novel formulations should be evaluated through preclinical studies and in adults or older children as appropriate before consideration for administration to neonates.

Intravenous (IV)

The intravenous route will normally be used in clinically unstable term and preterm neonates. Neonates have a fragile vasculature system, and it may be very difficult to obtain appropriate peripheral or central access. Most common IV routes are peripheral veins (limbs, feet, hands or scalp), umbilical vein, or “long” peripheral lines that can be considered central, whereas internal jugular vein or femoral vein access is uncommon. Neonates may only have a small number of IV lines to administer all medicines as well as blood products, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and fluid maintenance.

Oral

Oral administration should be used when possible and appropriate in the neonatal population, but there is still lack of data on absorption and safety. The way of enteral feeding (e.g., feeding tube, sucking), the time intervals (e.g. continuous, hourly feeds) and amounts of feeding have to be considered and specified.

Rectal Use

Rectal administration is not commonly used in this age group, and it is associated with erratic absorption. If considered it must be fully evaluated for safety and efficacy in addition to the appropriate bioavailability studies.

Topical Use

Topical administration may be necessary or suitable for local or systemic effect. Account must be taken of skin immaturity, especially in preterm neonates, and the large and more permeable and moisturised surface area to weight ratio which all predispose to an increased systemic absorption that could lead to toxicity.

Intramuscular (IM) use

Intramuscular administration is not usually a route of choice for neonates because absorption may be slow and unpredictable, varying with postnatal age and clinical state; injections may be painful and cause tissue damage. If the intramuscular route is considered its use must be justified.

Other Routes

Other routes of administration may be required or may be suitable (e.g., endotracheal, inhalation etc). Their use should be justified.

Dose Finding

In general, most drugs are developed for adults and older children before they are developed for the neonatal population. All relevant pre-clinical and clinical data in adults and children, or in adults and juvenile animals, should be taken into consideration to find a safe starting dose in neonates. PK / PD modelling techniques, using age appropriate and validated biomarkers, need to be considered to find the optimal dose. For a new medicinal product, the optimal dose has to be clinically verified. Existing physiologically based pharmacokinetic models to predict pharmacokinetic characteristics in the neonatal population may be considered if appropriate.

Pharmacokinetic Studies and PK/PD studies

Pharmacokinetic information is important to support adequate dosing in subpopulations of the clinically studied population and to assess the potential for clinical relevance of toxicity findings in the preclinical studies. However, pharmacokinetics alone is of limited value for extrapolating efficacy and safety from other patient groups, and extrapolation of efficacy will in general need pharmacodynamic data and PK/PD monitoring.

A population PK approach is preferable due to the importance of finding covariates related to dose-individualisation between individuals and over time in the maturating individual. The analysis can be made on rich and/or sparse data depending on the number of patients available and the possibility of developing highly sensitive analytical methods where very small sample volumes could be used.

Specific Aspects of Clinical Trial Design in Neonates

As for all clinical trials all measures to avoid bias should be included in trials performed in neonates. Therefore uncontrolled trials should be avoided in principle for demonstration of efficacy. They have limited usefulness for the demonstration of safety. On the other hand for randomised trials, in particular those using a placebo, there should be equipoise (genuine uncertainty) at the beginning of the trial and no participants should receive care known to be inferior to existing treatments.

The size of a trial conducted in neonates should be as small as possible to demonstrate the appropriate efficacy with sufficient statistical power. Adaptive, sequential, Bayesian or other designs may be used to minimise the size of the clinical trial. However, a balance between the need to stop recruitment early and the need to obtain reliable safety information should be aimed at.

In addition, clinical trials in neonates should be carried out in experienced neonatology centres with relevant expertise and with appropriate resources, in order to ensure optimum professional conditions for the protection and medical support of the neonates.

Age and Further Stratification Criteria

Taking into account age classes is of particular importance when recruiting patients within the clinically relevant age interval to optimise the evidence the potential influence of maturation. However, during data analysis, the use of age as a continuous co-variable is recommended whenever possible for the same reason.

The following subgroups within the neonatal population should be recognised as distinct, and the use or not-use of these criteria for stratification should be justified accordingly.

  • SGA or not; hypertrophy or not
  • ELBW, VLBW, and LBW
  • GA (for example, < 26 weeks, 26 – 29 weeks, 30 – 33 weeks, 34 – 36 weeks, >= 37 weeks)

Endpoints and Outcome Measures

For use in clinical trials in neonates, there is a need to elaborate clinically relevant primary endpoints, linked to the conditions and prospects specific to preterm and term neonates. In addition, the need for establishing age appropriate surrogate endpoints should be considered.

Pharmacogenetics and -genomics

The relationship between phenotype and genotype may be completely different in the neonate as compared to other patient groups. Genetic testing like other tests is subject to prior informed consent. If target genes of interest can be identified, pharmacogenetic analyses of these genes are encouraged. If there are important pharmacogenetic differences affecting pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of the medicinal product in the adult populations, pharmacogenetic analysis of the target genes is recommended in neonates. In such cases, the time-dependency (maturation) of the relationship between genotype and phenotype may need to be described.

Dosage Adjustment over Time

Within days in the life of preterm and term neonates, there may be large physiological and / or pathological changes in body weight, BSA, and body composition, as indicated above. For example, physiological post-natal weight loss may be more than 10 % of birth weight, and body weight in preterm neonates may increase rapidly, up to threefold during post-natal medical care.

Consequently, there is a need to continuously re-calculate and adjust dosages of investigational medicinal products on the basis of actual weight (or other relevant covariates) or on the basis of results from therapeutic drug monitoring, because fixed or perpetuated dosages are most probably inadequate in terms of efficacy and safety.

Placebo and Active Comparator

Use of placebo in neonates is more restricted than in adults and older children, as neonates are even more vulnerable. Placebo can be used on top of best standard of care, as placebo use does not imply the absence of treatment. The use of placebo may be needed for scientific reasons, for example to quantify variability and to determine treatment effects. Placebo may be warranted in children as in adults when evidence is lacking. As the level of evidence in favour of an effective treatment increases, the ethical justification for placebo use decreases. In all cases, placebo use should be accompanied by measures to minimise its use and to avoid irreversible harm, especially in serious or rapidly evolving diseases.

Blood Sampling

Preterm and term neonates have very limited blood volume, are often anaemic due to age and frequent sampling related to pathological conditions. The fact that they receive blood transfusions (or iron or erythropoietin supplementation) must not be used as a convenience for increased volume or frequency for blood sampling. The number of samples and/or sample volume should be kept to a minimum.

Study Analysis

As in any clinical trial, the study analysis should be carefully planned in advance, taking into account the limited amount of data that may be available with this patient population. The Guideline on Clinical Trials in Small Populations (CHMP/EWP/83561/2005) is fully applicable to studies with term and preterm neonates, and it therefore needs to be taken into consideration for the planning of the study and of the analysis.

Pain and Distress

As most investigations and procedures carry the risk of pain for the neonates, pain should be prevented, and if unavoidable evaluated, monitored and treated appropriately. Evaluating and monitoring the level of pain may be difficult in the neonate, as scales are based on physiological parameters that can be affected by concomitant diseases and procedures. However, the development and / or use of validated scales is recommended, for example, the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) or the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) scale for the assessment of pain.

Safety Monitoring

As a general recommendation for hospitalised neonates in a trial, vital signs should be monitored continuously, and related events should be registered according to neonatal definitions (apnea-bradycardia; sustained bradycardia, tachycardia, desaturation, hypotension; fever, hypothermia etc.). Specific age and/or gestation appropriate (e.g., laboratory) reference values and ranges should be used.

Pharmacovigilance and Long-Term Follow up of Safety

The challenging task of pharmacovigilance and follow-up in terms of duration and type depends on the product itself, the target organs, the duration of exposure and other risk factors for sequelae. The potential for adverse drug reactions occurring later in life should be monitored as neonates may have been exposed to medicinal products at a sensitive period in terms of organ maturation. Only a small number of neonates is likely to be included in rather short term trials, thus long-term adverse reactions may not be detected and would require additional appropriate pharmacovigilance approaches and particularly pharmacoepidemiological studies.

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Development Guidance   EMEA for Medical Products for Term and Preterm Neonates

Turn your Business Into an Investor Magnet

How to Write a Business Plan – Free E-Course

Get the secrets that turns your project into an investment magnet, 100% of our clients raise the finance they need to take their projects to the next stage, we will share these secrets with you. – Sign up for Free

Grow your Expertise for Free

As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

First name

E-mail address

This guideline ap
recombinant vaccines for the prevention and treatment of infectious disease, and provides guidance on quality, non-clinical and clinical aspects.
ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Development Guidance   EMEA for Medical Products for Term and Preterm Neonates

Cardiovascular Toxicity (QT prolongation) in Drug Development Overview

Nobody working in drug development can fail to be aware of the issue that is QT prolongation, however some people are finding they need a little more information if they are going to tackle and plan for it within their drug development programmes.

There are three main ways that cardiovascular toxicity can present itself:

  1. Changes to heart rate
  2. Changes to conductivity within the heart
  3. Changes to the repolarization of the heart (QT prolongation)

It is this QT prolongation that is obviously the hottest issue and is a consequence of impacting the repolarization of the cardiomyocytes. The pathway is the hERG channels are blocked, which increased the action potential of the cells in the heart, which in turn causes the QT prolongation.

This problem has been seen in a large number of drugs and has impacted on a great many drug development programmes, from complete removal of a drug from the market, to prescribing restrictions, delays in approval and a huge number of drugs killed at an early stage. It is also worth noting that there is not a pattern to those drugs affected and it appears to affect a large number of different drugs.

But what can be done to manage this risk? Well there are a wide variety of early discovery screens, In-vitro, Ex-vivo, and In-vivo.

The most common In-vitro study is the Patch Clamp – this is actually the gold standard study and involves measuring the current through the hERG channel (Ikr Chanel) to give an IC50 for the drug, this IC50 will give you an indication if you are going to see effects at therapeutic dose levels. Whilst this is the gold standard it is not a test that lends itself well to high throughput screening.

Another test is the hERG binding assay, this is a competitive assay that tests your drug against a radio labeled standard, this is a good test which can be used in high throughput screening, and is well correlated to the Patch Clamp test.

Another is the Rubidium Flux assay, where you load the cells with rubidium add your compound and KCl, this allows you to measure the rubidium excreted from the cell and from this judge hERG channel activity. This once again lends itself to even fast screening but there is some drop off in relation to the gold standard.

The final test is the membrane potential dye test, where cells are loaded with dye and as the hERG channel functions dye is flushed from the cell, this is the fastest test but least accurate.

The tests most commonly used are the hERG binding assay and Rubidium flux tests

In terms of Ex-vivo models the most popular are pukinji fiber tests and isolated heart tests, these whole tissue and whole organ tests are expensive but do provide a lot more information on what is going on and provide a wider insight.

In-vivo tests include dogs, non-human-primates, and pigs, rodents are not a good model for the human heart and should not be used. Again the expense of these models is made up for by the excellent data they provide. The studies are generally conducted in conscious animals which are remotely monitored, single dose cross over study designs are used, time and duration of effect is looked for and compared with systemic drug levels. Heart rate, ECG, Blood Pressure, Body Temperature, and activity levels are all monitored.

One of the most important things to look at is left ventricular pressure as this gives the greatest insight into normal function, Charles Rivers have done a great deal of work to validate this with Atenolo and Pimobedam. With both drugs systolic BP, diastolic BP and heart rate remained the same but changes in left ventricular pressure alluded to issues that needed to be addressed.

There are two guidelines that need to be referred to when planning these studies ICH57A (general safety pharmacology) and ICH57B (Specific QT prolongation regulations).

When assessing the Pre-clinical it is important to take a good look at the data and consider the following; what was actually observed as the assays are not 100% effective, any small flags will impact on clinical trial design, how will the expected PK/PD profiles impact on the results, will you expect patients to get into affected dose levels?

Before commencing human trials there are guidelines that need to be considered ICH E14 which gives instruction on the evaluation of QT prolongation in man, in some regions its now compulsory, but in others you can argue away from it with pre-clinical data.  In the clinic QT prolongation is tested in healthy volunteers at therapeutic doses and multiples thereof, metabolic inhibition may be needed to raise drug levels levels high enough, positive controls are also used (moxifloxacin).

Where QT prolongation is seen the following guidelines are provided:

  • <5 msec – no risk
  • 6-10 msec unlikely risk
  • >10 msec possible risk

These regulations are the same for cardiovascular drugs as for other therapy areas.

Another important thing to consider is that QT prolongation is not an issue that affects biologicals, as demonstrated by Vergas, Boss et al 2008 (J Pharmacol and Tox Method 58;72-76)

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.


ea featured 3 Cardiovascular Toxicity (QT prolongation) in Drug Development Overview

Clinical Trials in Eastern Europe

There has been allot of talk about running clinical trials in Eastern Europe, but what are the statistics and the feasibility, I have been looking at this and have some information to share.I have had a quick look at the following areas:

  • Hungary
  • Poland
  • Czech Republic
  • Slovenia
  • Slovakia
  • and some Baltic states

All the above appear to be great with clear and transparent regulations implementing the EU Clinical Trials Directive. Some other states have a less transparent regulatory system although they tend to stick to the EU Clinical Trials Directive:

  • Croatia
  • Bulgaria
  • Romania
  • Serbia
  • Bosnia
  • Macedonia

Then there is the less stable politically and economically and transparent regions which are generally the former Soviet Union States.

There are a number of advantages of working in these regions, they have large centralised state funded hospitals, with access to advanced medical technologies and high quality educated staff. A huge number of companies have been conducting trials in the area for some time and the infrastructure is there. All this means that patient accrual can be well above the levels expected in the EU and USA, typically 2 to 4 months ahead.

Investigators have huge access to untreated patients, there is less competition for patients, and the investigators tend to be very highly qualified, and participation in a western clinical trial is a sign of merit. The high quality of staff does not end with the investigators, CRA’s tend to be pharmacists and physicians, highly educated and competent people, this is expressed in the quality of the data, which typically surpasses  Western Europe standards. The FDA has no concerns over data coming from the region, in fact the FDA experiences a lower rate of voluntary action indicated (VAI) and Official Action indicated (OAI) than in the EU and USA.

However the one key driver is often price, investigator and study expenses are typically much lower and then monitoring costs are usually on 60-70% those seen in the EU and USA. I will be looking at the region for my next clinical trial.

If you would like to discuss this in more detail or get access to my contact in the region please get in touch.

As consultants working in the area of drug development, regulatory strategy and development strategy we are often involved in these kinds of document development processes and good housekeeping is vital. eCTD is coming to us all so its best we get up to speed as early as possible.

If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch using the contact form or email Damien at damien.bove@idaconsultants.com