The FDA published this guidance back in April but we have just now had the time to review it.
This guidance is intended to assist applicants who are submitting abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) in complying with FDA’s new requirements for the submission of bioequivalence (BE) data.
FDA’s final rule on “Requirements for Submission of Bioequivalence Data” (the BE data rule) requires ANDA applicants to submit data from all BE studies the applicant conducts on a drug product formulation submitted for approval, including studies that do not demonstrate that the generic product meets the current bioequivalence criteria.
This guidance provides information on the following subjects:
- The types of ANDA submissions covered by the BE data rule
- A recommended format for summary reports of BE studies
- The types of formulations FDA considers to be the same drug product formulation for
- Different dosage forms based on differences in composition.
The important points of this guidance is that all studies must be submitted for ANDA applications and a format for those submissions is advised:
“For a suggested format for summary reports, please refer to the Office of Generic Drugs (OGD) Web page.6 The Division of Bioequivalence has developed model data summary tables in a concise format consistent with the ICH Common Technical Document (CTD). The tables, under the heading “Model Bioequivalence Data Summary Tables,” are available in Word and PDF formats. The FDA recommends that these table formats be used to organize the data for summary reports required by the BE data rule”
Drug Formulation
FDA amended the regulations to require an applicant to submit data from all BE studies conducted on the same formulation of the drug product submitted for approval.
“Same drug product formulation means the formulation of the drug product submitted for approval and any formulations that have minor differences in composition or method of manufacture from the formulation submitted for approval, but are similar enough to be relevant to the FDA’s determination of bioequivalence”
The guidance goes into greater detail on this point, this forms the bulk of the guidelines.
If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com
Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

As you know this website is a great resourse for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.
Drug Regulators, EMEA (EMA), Publish Comments Draft Guidance on the Investigation of Bioequivalence
Drug Regulators, EMEA (EMA), Publish Draft Guidance on the Investigation of Bioequivalence.
Full text Here
Organisations that commented on the draft Guideline as released for consultation
1 EFPIA
2 European Generic medicines Association (EGA)
3 EUFEPS Network on BABP
4 FIP Special Interest Group on BCS and Biowaiver
5 BPI-German Pharmaceutical Industry Association
6 The Association of the European Self Medication Industry (AESGP)
7 European Federation of Statisticians in the Pharmaceutical Industry
8 European Quality Assurance Confederation
9 International Association for Pharmaceutical Technology
10 BEBAC-Consultancy Services for bioequivalence and Bioavailability Studies
11 CIPLA LTD. INDIA
12 Pharmascience Inc. Montreal, Canada
13 Anapharm
14 Lupin Bioresearch Center
15 MANEESH PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD
16 MDS PHARMA SERVICES
17 POLFA TARCHOMIN S.A
18 PHAST GmbH
19 Jenson Pharmaceutical Services Ltd
20 Douglas Pharmaceuticals Ltd
21 Ratiopharm GmbH
22 Ranbaxy
23 Orion Corp. Orion Pharma
24 Gilead Sciences International Ltd
25 CEPHA s.r.o.
26 H.L. Lundbeck A/S
27 Combino-pharm
28 Bayer Schering Pharma AG/Clinical Pharmacology and Global Pharmacometrics
29 Quinta Analytica-s.r.o.
30 Hexal AG
31 Synthon BV
32 UCB Pharma S.A.
33 Merck Sharp & Dohme (Europe) Inc
34 ACC GmbH, Analytical Clinical Concepts
35 Slovak National Accreditation Service
36 Good Laboratory Practice Monitoring Authority
37 Norwegian Accreditation
38 Eye- Care Industries European Economic interest grouping
39 Dr. Nasir Idkaidek
40 Patrick Nicolas
41 Atholl Johnston
42 Laszlo Endrenyi
43 Aldo Rescigno
44 Carla M Catsmella
45 Salvador Fudio
46 Dr. Kamal K. Midha and Dr. Gordon McKay
47 Swissmedic
Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.
Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!
Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulattions, rules and initiatives each month, and summarise them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.
“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”
→ Leave a comment
Posted in clinical, marketing, pre-clinical
Tagged bioequivalence, comments, guidance