Category Archives: Uncategorized

EMA Publish Concept Paper on Addendum to Guidance on Evaluation of Treatments for Bacterial Infections

EMA Publish Concept Paper on Addendum to Guidance on Evaluation of Treatments for Bacterial Infections

This Concept Paper proposes the development of an addendum to the Note for Guidance on Evaluation of New Anti-bacterial Medicinal Products (CPMP/EWP/558/95 Rev 2).
During the revision of the previous version of the guideline (CPMP/EWP/558/95 Rev 1) consideration was given to the need to develop guidance on clinical data requirements to support the approval of specific indications for use. During the consultation period several requests were made for the CHMP to provide more detailed guidance on issues such as patient selection criteria and primary endpoints, including efficacy variables and the timing of the assessment of outcomes. It was proposed that CHMP should give further consideration to, and provide additional clarification regarding, indications for which superiority or non-inferiority study designs could be accepted. In the case of superiority studies, it was requested that further consideration should be given to the feasibility of conducting comparisons between test agents and either placebo or active comparators. In the case of non-inferiority studies there were requests for further consideration of appropriate values of delta. More guidance was considered to be needed regarding clinical development programmes for new antibacterial agents with potential for clinical activity against rare and/or multidrug-resistant pathogens and the accumulation of data to support indications for which there is currently no established regulatory pathway.

In order to gain further insight into the issues raised during consultation a 2-day Workshop was held in February 2011 at which representatives from the pharmaceutical industry and academia met with EU  Regulators to discuss several of these matters (insert link to final published report). Taking into account the written comments received during the consultation period and the discussions during this Workshop it appeared to be appropriate to provide additional guidance along the lines requested. It is proposed that following adoption of the revision of the main guidance document an addendum should be developed to provide indication-specific guidance. The issues that have been identified for inclusionor further consideration in the addendum are detailed below.

The content of CPMP/EWP/558/95 Rev 2 covers the general approach to the development of antibacterial agents. This guideline (as with its predecessors) does not provide detailed indicationspecific guidance. It is now apparent that such guidance is needed in order to describe and clarify the CHMP’s position on various matters.



For Assistance with Regulation of Anti-Bacterial Products Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2011-10-16

Powered by Twitter Tools

NICE Publish Guidance on Golimumab

NICE Publish Guidance on Golimumab

Full Text Here

Golimumab is recommended as an option for the treatment of severe, active ankylosing spondylitis in adults only if:
it is used as described for adalimumab and etanercept in ‘Adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for ankylosing spondylitis’ (NICE technology appraisal guidance 143) and
the manufacturer provides the 100 mg dose of golimumab at the same cost as the 50 mg dose in accordance with the patient access scheme.

People currently receiving golimumab for the treatment of severe, active ankylosing spondylitis who do not fulfil the criteria for treatment with adalimumab and etanercept described in NICE technology appraisal guidance 143 should have the option to continue golimumab until they and their clinician consider it appropriate to stop.



For Assistance with Submitting Evidence to NICE Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

NICE Publish Guidance on Hypertension

NICE Publish Guidance on Hypertension

Full Text Here

High blood pressure (hypertension) is one of the most important preventable causes of premature morbidity and mortality in the UK. Hypertension is a major risk factor for ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, cognitive decline and premature death. Untreated hypertension is usually associated with a progressive rise in blood pressure. The vascular and renal damage that this may cause can culminate in a treatment-resistant state.
Blood pressure is normally distributed in the population and there is no natural cut-off point above which ‘hypertension’ definitively exists and below which it does not. The risk associated with increasing blood pressure is continuous, with each 2 mmHg rise in systolic blood pressure associated with a 7% increased risk of mortality from ischaemic heart disease and a 10% increased risk of mortality from stroke.  Hypertension is remarkably common in the UK and the prevalence is strongly influenced by age. In any individual person, systolic and/or diastolic blood pressures may be elevated. Diastolic pressure is more commonly elevated in people younger than 50. With ageing, systolic hypertension becomes a more significant problem, as a result of progressive stiffening and loss of compliance of larger arteries. At least one  quarter of adults (and more than half of those older than 60) have high blood pressure.

The clinical management of hypertension is one of the most common interventions in primary care, accounting for approximately £1 billion in drug costs alone in 2006.
The guideline will assume that prescribers will use a drug’s summary of product characteristics to inform decisions made with individual patients. This guideline recommends drugs for indications for which they do not have a UK marketing authorisation at the date of publication, if there is good evidence to support that use. Where recommendations have been made for the use of drugs outside their licensed  indications (‘off-label use’), these drugs are marked with a footnote in the recommendations.



For Assistance with Submitting Evidence to NICE Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

NICE Publish Guidance on Inditherm Patient Warming for Hypothermia

NICE Publish Guidance on Inditherm Patient Warming for Hypothermia

Full Text Here

The case for adopting the Inditherm patient warming mattress in the NHS is supported by the evidence. The clinical evidence suggests that the effectiveness of the Inditherm patient warming mattress in maintaining patient core body temperature above 36°C is similar to that of forced air warming, and that the Inditherm mattress may have practical advantages.

The Inditherm patient warming mattress should be considered for use in patients undergoing operations that carry a risk of inadvertent hypothermia.

The annual cost saving when the Inditherm patient warming system is compared with forced air warming is estimated to be £9800 per operating theatre (assuming that all eligible patients are warmed). This is based on an annual cost of £1300 for an Inditherm patient warming system comprising one full-length and one half-length mattress, two blankets and three controllers, and including maintenance costs.


For Assistance with Submitting Evidence to NICE Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2011-10-09

Powered by Twitter Tools

NICE Publish Tech Appraisal, Abatacept for Rheumatoid Arthritis

NICE Publish Tech Appraisal, Abatacept for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Full Text Here

Abatacept in combination with methotrexate is not recommended for the treatment of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis in adults whose disease has responded inadequately to one or more conventional non-biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) including methotrexate.

People currently receiving abatacept in combination with methotrexate for the treatment of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis, whose disease has responded inadequately to one or more conventional non-biological DMARDs including methotrexate, should have the option to continue treatment until they, and their clinicians, consider it appropriate to stop.

Abatacept (Orencia, Bristol-Myers Squibb) is a selective T-cell modulator that blocks a co-stimulatory signal required to activate T-cells. Abatacept has a marketing authorisation for use in combination with methotrexate for the treatment of moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis in adults whose disease has responded inadequately to previous therapy with one or more DMARDs including methotrexate or a tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor.

Abatacept is administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion. After an initial infusion (week 0), a person receives an infusion at week 2, at week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter. Abatacept is available in 250-mg vials at a cost of £242.17 per vial (excluding VAT; ‘British national formulary’ [BNF] edition 61). Fourteen infusions are required in the first year, and 13 infusions in subsequent years. The dose of abatacept depends on body weight: people weighing less than 60 kg, 60–100 kg and over 100 kg require 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg respectively. The annual drug costs associated with abatacept vary according to body weight and the number of infusions required. For a person weighing 60−100 kg, the cost is £10,171.14 in the first year, and £9444.63 in subsequent years. Costs may vary in different settings because of negotiated procurement discounts.


For Assistance with Submitting Evidence to NICE Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2011-10-02

Powered by Twitter Tools

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2011-09-25

Powered by Twitter Tools

EMA Publish Paper on Revision of Non-Clinical and Clinical Development of Similar Biologicals – Human Insulin

EMA Publish Paper on Revision of Non-Clinical and Clinical Development of Similar Biologicals – Human Insulin

Full Text Here

The current Guidance on Similar Medicinal Products containing Recombinant Human Insulin provides recommendations for the development of recombinant soluble (short-acting) human insulin claimed to be similar to a reference product already authorised in the EU. This guideline came into effect in June 2006 but, so far, no biosimilar insulin has been licensed in the EU. Three products applied for by the same Applicant were withdrawn prior to Opinion.

More recently, several EMA scientific advices on the development of biosimilar insulins, particularly insulin analogues, have been requested. Insulin analogues and long-acting human insulin preparations are currently not covered by the above guideline. In addition, different study populations, study designs and insulin doses have been proposed for the pivotal PD study (clamp study). Moreover, the guideline does not appear to be clear on whether the PK study can be combined with the PD study. Questions were raised regarding the most suitable patient population and size of the clinical safety study. It has also been questioned whether non-clinical studies would always be needed in the development of biosimilar insulins.

Although similar considerations and scientific principles may apply to biosimilar insulin analogues and long-acting human insulin preparations as to soluble insulins, some thoughts may need to be given to the sensitivity of the clamp study for detection of potential differences in the duration of action or other summary measures between long-acting insulin formulations due to the flat PK profile of these insulins and high variability in the tail part of the clamp study. In addition, further considerations regarding the study population (patients with type 1 diabetes versus healthy volunteers), study design (e.g. with
versus without basal insulin infusion) and insulin dose in the clamp study could be included. It may be clarified that the comparative PK evaluation is usually expected to be part of the clamp (PD) study. It
could also be clarified that no formal non-inferiority testing for antibody frequency is expected in the safety study and that inclusion of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes may be appropriate. Regarding non-clinical requirements, a risk-based approach may be introduced.



For Assistance with Registering Biosimilar Products Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

EMA Improves Package Leaflets

EMA Improves Package Leaflets

Full Text Here

The European Medicines Agency has updated the template for package leaflets for human medicines, to make the information easier for patients to understand and to include new sections on medicines’ benefits and their uses in children.

The Agency introduced these changes to contribute towards the safe and effective use of medicines. They address the feedback from five years of user testing and from a range of stakeholders, including patient and consumer groups, national medicines regulatory agencies, the pharmaceutical industry and academics.

This feedback included concerns that the package leaflet needed to be more readable with fewer rigid standard statements, and that patients needed more information on the benefits that medicines can bring and on their uses in children.

The update also takes the Agency’s report on the expectations of patients, consumers and healthcare professionals regarding benefit-risk information into account, as well as the requirements of the paediatric regulation.

The Agency’s Working Group on Quality Review of Documents introduced these changes as part of the latest revision of the human product information templates.

In addition to the package leaflet, the revision included changes to the templates for the summary of product characteristics, labelling, and ‘annex II’, the section of the product information covering the conditions imposed on marketing authorisations.

The updated templates are available in all official European Union languages, as well as Icelandic and Norwegian, together with an implementation plan. Versions of the templates showing the latest updates as ‘tracked changes’ are also available.


For Assistance with Leaflet Design Translation and Readability Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

FDA Publish 510K Guidance – When to Submit a 510K for a Change

FDA Publish 510K Guidance – When to Submit a 510K for a Change

FDA developed this draft document to provide guidance to manufacturers on when to submit a premarket notification submission (510(k)) for changes or modifications made to that manufacturer’s1 previously cleared medical device. The underlying principles that FDA uses to determine when a 510(k) is necessary for a modified device are explained here, and examples are provided for additional clarity. When final, this guidance will supersede the 1997 version of the guidance document, Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device.
In 2010, FDA initiated a review of its process for premarket review of medical devices and undertook two significant initiatives to improve the Agency’s medical device premarket review programs. In August 2010, FDA released two reports, including the analyses and recommendations that suggested changes were needed to improve the predictability, consistency, and transparency of these programs. After receiving input from industry, stakeholders and the public, in January 2011, FDA announced 25 specific actions that the Agency will take to improve the premarket review programs. Updating the 1997 version of the guidance document, Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device, is one of these actions.

The recommendations in this draft guidance document are consistent with FDA policy for when a modification to a device does – and does not – require the submission of a 510(k).

The guidance has been updated, however, to address issues associated with software and other rapidly changing technologies, and to provide greater clarity about changes that do not trigger the need for a new premarket submission. This guidance uses examples of modifications to devices involving such technologies to illustrate changes that require a new 510(k), and changes that may simply be documented in accordance with a manufacturer’s existing Quality System without prompting the need for a new 510(k) submission. FDA believes increased certainty about the regulatory conseque



For Assistance with Registering and Maintaing Device Submissions Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

EMA Publish Guidance on Variations to a Marketing Authorisation

EMA Publish Guidance on Variations to a Marketing Authorisation

Full Text Here

The following guideline provides guidance on the stability data which have to be generated in order to support a variation to a Marketing Authorisation. The guideline provides general guidance on stability testing in case of type I (A and B) variations and addresses the data requirements for widely encountered cases of type II variations.

The following guideline sets out the stability testing requirements for variations to a Marketing Authorisation after approval. This guideline is an extension of the CHMP and CVMP Guidelines on Stability Testing of Existing Active Substances and Related Finished Products and the respective ICH/VICH Guidelines for New Active Substances and Drug Products. It is intended to be applied in the European Union.
The guideline seeks to exemplify the stability data required for variations to active substances and/or finished products. It is not always necessary to follow this when there are scientifically justifiable reasons for using alternative approaches.
The guideline provides a general indication on the requirement for stability testing, but leaves sufficient flexibility to encompass the variety of different practical situations required for specific scientific situations and characteristics of the material being evaluated.

The purpose of this guideline is to outline the stability data which have to be generated in case of variations. It is applicable to chemical active substances and related finished products, herbal drugs, herbal drug preparations and related herbal medicinal products, however not to radiopharmaceuticals, biologicals and products derived from biotechnology.
Variations for active substances and finished products encompass a wide range of situations. The Guideline provides general guidance on stability testing in case of type I (A and B) variations, furthermore, it addresses the information required for active substances and/or finished products in widely encountered cases of type II variations as listed in section 6.



For Assistance with Regulatory Filings Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

EMA Announces Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (ENCePP) Information Day

EMA Announces Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (ENCePP) Information Day

Full Text Here

This information day is benefitting all pharmaceutical industry staff, in particular those responsible for risk management plans and post-authorisation studies (e.g. pharmacovigilance, pharmacoepidemiology and regulatory affairs) and academics, regulators, editors of medical journals, funding bodies and other professionals specialising in the field of observational research.


For Assistance with Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance Planning and Implementation Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

 

EMA Announce Meeting on Paedatic Regulation in its 5th Year

EMA Announce Meeting on Paediatric Regulation in its 5th Year

Full Text Here

Conference objectives include updating participants how to deal with paediatric regulatory requirements, scientific and operational challenges; exchanging experiences with regulatory authorities, academia and industry; and discussing visions, daily challenges and potential ways to move forward and further improve processes for paediatric drug development.

 

 


 

For Assistance with Paediatric Development Planning Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

 

 

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

EMA Publish Guidane on Local Tolerance Testing

EMA Publish Guidance on Local Tolerance Testing

Full Text Here

The existing guideline on local tolerance is dated 1 March 2001 (1). Over the past years, newer routes of administration, e.g. transdermal systems, are being used more frequently and a shift has been observed towards the regulatory acceptance of scientifically valid in vitro methods as well as formally validated in vitro methods as part of an integrated testing strategy. In addition, recently the ICH Guideline M3(R2) – Non-Clinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorisation for Pharmaceuticals (2) – came into force and included a section on local tolerance.

The focus on local tolerance testing has broadened over the last few years, with newer methods of drug delivery being developed. In vitro methods are becoming an integral part of the non-clinical testing local tolerance testing programme of human medicinal products and approaches aiming at reducing or refining animal studies are routinely implemented in regulatory guidelines, where applicable.
Taking into account the progress in the development of newer drug delivery strategies, a revision of the Guideline on Non-Clinical Local Tolerance Testing of Medicinal Products is warranted. The revision will also aim to harmonise local tolerance testing requirements with those out lined in the ICH Guideline M3(R2) – Non-Clinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorisation for Pharmaceuticals (2).



For Assistance with The Development of Bio-Similars Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2011-09-04

  • wikileaks complaining of a data leak, ahhh the irony of it. alanis moriset could learn from that. http://t.co/dzTRY4Y #

Powered by Twitter Tools

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2011-07-17

  • I am building lots of business in the herbal field, anybody else seeing lots of traffic. In that area? #

Powered by Twitter Tools

Job Opportunity – Broad Senior Marketing Manager Opportunity- Pharma

Job Opportunity – Broad Senior Marketing Manager Opportunity- Pharma

A pharmaceutical marketing consultancy, with clients on an international basis requires a senior Marketing professional to be involved with a number of interesting projects. With a focus on improving and troubleshooting a lot of marketing problems in the pharmaceutical market, you will gain a number o contacts in the industry while also having the opportunity to progress upwards further down the line.

Based west of London towards Surrey, you could be located in a picturesque and historical town with a high standard of living. Just over an hour from central London by train, it is commutable for weekend trips into the capital and having the benefit of the city life, while living in a quiet location.

Ideally with a strong, pure marketing background in the pharmaceutical industry at around the manager level and upwards, you should be motivated to work for a progressive company with some travelling involved. Previous experience of training marketing professionals and improving marketing plans is beneficial, so get in touch as soon as possible not to miss out!

Should this be of interest to you or if you would like to confidentially discuss other similar opportunities then contact Jonathan McNab on +44 (0)20 7940 2105 or email j.mcnab@nonstop-recruitment.com. Get in touch as soon as possible so you don’t miss out on this fantastic opportunity! be sure to Tell them you saw it here!

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2011-07-10

  • @AlexGudino2 Hello thanks for the follow, what is you area of interest? #

Powered by Twitter Tools