Category Archives: devices

FDA Publish Guidance on IDEs and INDs for Repair or Replace Knee Cartilage

This guidance document provides answers of investigational device exemption application (IDE) on investigational new drug application (IND) recommendations about the information they need to include within their submission on describing their products but is intended to replace or repair knee cartilage.

This guidance supplements other recommendations in the area of drugs and biologicals and devices provide recommendations specific to cartilage repair or replacement. the FDA considers these products a significant risk area, and requires you to have specific approval from the FDA conducting research in this area. Advice from the institutional review board is no longer sufficient.

FDA published updated draft guidance on humanitarian use device designations (HUD)

The FDA has published this guidance to assist applicants with the preparation and submission of humanitarian use device (HUD) designation requests. Requests are made to the office of orphan product development (OOPD). This guidance will also help FDA reviewers in their evaluation and analysis of HUD requests.

The topics addressed in this draft guidance include: 1) demonstrating the device is designed to treat diagnose disease or condition that affects manifesting fewer than 4000 individuals in the United States per year, 2) how this demonstration varies depending whether the device is intended for therapeutic diagnostic purposes, 3) how properties of the device may affect this demonstration and 4) delineating a medically plausible subset of patients with a given disease or condition.

full guidance given below

FDA Publish Guidance on Container and Closure Systems Testing

FDA Publish Guidance on Container and Closure Systems Testing

Full Text Here

This guidance document provides recommendations to you, manufacturers, for using methods other than sterility testing to confirm container and closure system integrity as a part of the stability protocol for sterile biological products, human and animal drugs, and medical devices. This guidance document finalizes the draft guidance of the same title dated January 1998 (January 28, 1998, 63 Federal Register (FR) 4272).
Manufacturers of drugs and biologics purporting to be sterile must test each batch or lot, as the case may be, to ensure that the product in question conforms to sterility requirements. 21 CFR 211.167(a); 21 CFR 610.12. Such drugs and biologics are also subject to stability testing requirements. 21 CFR 211.166. The stability testing requirements include maintaining a written testing program designed to assess stability characteristics. Manufacturers of medical devices must validate processes, including sterilization for a device purporting to be sterile. 21 CFR 820.75. Stability testing should be part of the design validation of such devices. In vitro diagnostic products for human use are required to be labeled with stability information. 21 CFR 809.10. For products labeled as sterile, we consider sterility to be a stability characteristic.
The purpose of stability testing is to provide evidence on how the quality of a substance or product varies with time under the influence of a variety of environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, and light, which enables you to establish or modify recommended storage conditions, retest periods, and shelf life or dating period, as the case may be.2 This guidance document applies only to the replacement of the sterility test with an appropriate container and closure system integrity test in the stability written testing program (referred to in this guidanceas the “stability protocol”), recommending an alternative to sterility testing for supporting the continued capability of containers to maintain sterility. The guidance document does not apply to sterility testing methods for product sterility testing prior to release, as container and closure system integrity tests cannot demonstrate a product’s initial sterility.
This guidance document provides information that we recommend you consider when you propose using alternative methods to sterility testing to confirm the integrity of a container and closure system throughout the product’s shelf life or dating period. The recommendations in this guidance document apply to both pre- and post-approval stability protocols for sterile biological products, human and animal drugs, including investigational and bulk drugs. For medical devices, the recommendations in this guidance document apply to stability protocols for those devices labeled as sterile.
If you currently perform sterility testing as a stability-indicating test as part of a stability protocol, you may continue to do so. If your product is approved for an alternative to sterility testing as a component of your stability protocol, this document is not intended to recommend additional testing requirements.


For Assistance with Quality Aspects of Packaging Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

FDA awards three grants to stimulate development of pediatric medical devices

FDA awards three grants to stimulate development of pediatric medical devices

Full Text Here

Grantees will work with industry and the FDA to address unmet pediatric device needs

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today announced the awards of three grants to boost the development and availability of medical devices for children.

A panel of five experts with experience in medicine, business, and device development reviewed 10 applications for the grants, which will be administered by the FDA’s Office of Orphan Products Development. The recipients and grant amounts include:

• James Geiger, M.D. and Andre Muelenaer, M.D. of the University of Michigan Pediatric Device Consortium and the Pediatric Medical Device Institute Pediatric Medical Device Consortium, $1.1 million a year for two years.
• Michael Harrison, M.D. and the University of California, San Francisco Pediatric Device Consortium, $500,000 a year for two years.
• Barbara Boyan, Ph.D. and the Atlanta Pediatric Consortium, $900,000 a year for two years.

“Congress provides FDA with this funding so that we can help connect innovators and their ideas to experienced professionals who can assist them through development,” said Debra Lewis, O.D., acting director of the FDA’s Office of Orphan Product Development. “Development of medical devices for children lags up to a decade behind similar devices used in adults.”

Children differ in terms of size, growth, and body chemistry and present unique challenges to device designers. In addition, the activity level and ability to manage some implantable or long-term devices may vary greatly among children. While this program is administered by the Office of Orphan Products Development, it is intended to encompass devices used in all pediatric diseases, not just rare diseases.



For Assistance with Device Development and Regulation Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

FDA Publishes Staff Guidance on De Novo Classification and Evaluation Class III Devices

FDA Publishes Staff Guidance on De Novo Classification and Evaluation Class III Devices

Full Text Here

The purpose of this document is to provide guidance on the process for the submission and review of petitions under section 513(f)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act), also known as the de novo classification process. This process provides a route to market for medical devices that are low to moderate risk, but that have been classified in class III because FDA has found them to be “not substantially equivalent” (NSE) to legally marketed predicate devices.



For Assistance with FDA Class III Device Registations Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

 

Health Canada Publishes Guidance on Inspection Strategy for Medical Device Companies

Health Canada Publishes Guidance on Inspection Strategy for Medical Device Companies.

Full Text Here

The purpose of this document is to detail the strategy for the effective and uniform implementation of a national inspection program for the medical device industry in order to assess compliance against applicable requirements of the Food and Drugs Act (Act) and the Medical Devices Regulations (Regulations).

Historically, the medical device regulatory compliance program has primarily utilized a responsive approach, resolving issues of noncompliance on a case by case basis. A more systematic approach in the form of a proactive medical device inspection program is needed to improve and maintain compliance across the industry. For manufacturers holding device licences, regulatory compliance is assessed through CAN-ISO 13485:03 quality system audits under the Canadian Medical Devices Conformity Assessment System (CMDCAS), conducted by accredited registrars. This inspection program is designed to address regulatory compliance of companies subject to establishment licensing and the manufacturers of class I devices.
The synergy resulting from the continued responsive approach, together with the proactive Inspection Strategy described in this document, is expected to significantly enhance regulatory compliance and, thereby, the safety and effectiveness of medical devices on the Canadian market.



For Assistance with Device Regulation in Canada E Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

Game to be regulated as a drug

Game to be regulated as a drug,

This is a potential game changes a game is seeking FDA approval as a drug, the game by Brain Plasticity is a cognitive training game and has been fine tuned to help people with Schizophrenia improve the deficits in attention and memory that are associated with the condition.

A clinical study has been planned and the company is seeking FDA drug regulation, this is a huge step and could change the medical landscape for years to come. In most instances people wish to avoid regulation as much as possible and would seak to have this as a device, however there are strong marketing reasons for getting it a drug status and the biological impact of the tool is without question.

But how will this impact on other people developing software packages will they be forced to go down the same route and register their products as medical interventions, once this precident has been set where will it go, we are all awaiting the FDA opinion with baited breath.



For Assistance with Drug and Device regulations in the USA and EU Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

Advancing the need for cultural localisation of medical device software tools

 Advancing the need for cultural localisation of medical device software tools

Article by Associate Consultant Mark Gibson

Software localisation of medical devices is not a universal regulatory requirement. However, software localisation is vital as a competitive tool to gain a foothold in foreign markets. This potential advantage is not only the case for medical device manufacturers, but also for all software applications that aim to be used outside their native language regions.

Take, for example, a medical device that incorporates a software program that relies on date expression for safe and effective use. The software originates in the USA, whose developers programmed date to be expressed as follows:

02.12.2010 (for 12th February 2010)

The device and software in question is to be marketed in the UK, Spain, Sweden and South Korea. However, date expression differs from country to country, as is illustrated with the example of 12th February 2010 below:

USA UK Spain Sweden South Korea
02.12.2010 12.02.2010 12/02/2010 2010-02-12 2010.02.12

However, the software, in its current iteration, cannot accommodate these cultural date conventions. From this example, it is possible to see at a glance the potential confusion this could bring to a user in each country if the original US format is not localised to the respective countries’ usual formulations of date expression. Another common example is how units of measurement are expressed, such as the UK Imperial system, the US Customary system and the more internationally recognised metric system.

Product localisation and cultural adaptation can help address safety issues related to human factors, such as the risks outlined above with the improper interpretation of date/time information or unit of measurement. Safety issues in medical device development can be identified in trials and resolved in the development process in the initial locale, i.e. where the device was created, before it goes to market. However, the impact of faulty translation and localisation issues that affect safety are not as carefully controlled, verified or validated and many such issues are not identified until after the product has been licensed and marketed. This can often lead to product recalls in the countries in question, which naturally has a direct and negative impact on the manufacturer’s revenues.

Issues also worth considering are

Software localisation and cultural adaptation

Customising software application for use in different target locales will help users in different countries gain maximum benefit from your device. Typically, this would include the translation of accompanying documentation, help files, user interface components, such as screen/display text, buttons, error messages, and so on, as well as ensuring the adaptation of software to the target locale to specific local conventions and requirements, such as date/time formats. The adaptation aspect of the service would involve aspects of user-centred design or human factor testing.

Software verification and validation

The objectives of software verification and validation is to provide evidence that the design outputs of a particular phase in the software development life-cycle meets all the specified requirements for that phase, such as FDA’s General Principles of Software Validation Guidance [1].  Software validation provides insights into the usability of the tool through the provision of objective evidence from a user-centred process that the software specifications conform to user needs and intended uses of the device in question.

The business case for undertaking localisation and cultural adaptation services is supported by legislation. For instance, FDA’s Medical Device Quality System Regulation Part 820:30 (21 Code of Federal Regulations 820:30)[2] states that labelling, whether electronic, paper-based or both, is considered part of the medical device and subject to design control. In Europe, the Medical Devices Directive (MDD) [3], as well as ISO 13485:2003 also requires design control and software validation for medical devices as part of the application for Marketing Authorisation within the EU. Accordingly, as with traditional labelling, the User Interface of medical device software tool can carry vital information about the product in question for safe and effective use. For many products, the User Interface provides the medium for the user’s interaction with device. In some cases, the software is the only way to interact with the device, or with stand-alone tools, the software is the device.  Furthermore, ISO14971: Medical Device Risk Management identifies a lack of product localisation as a possible cause for hazards and recommends, as standard practice, the involvement of an expert in localisation risk for both the labelling of the product and its User Interface.

In addition to the regulatory framework currently in place, the advantages of these are to:

  • Provide medical device developers with a tool to mitigate risk
  • Help to gain an advantage in foreign markets

Help to support a global user base for the product.



For Assistance with Software Localisation Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

FDA Update Website on Combination Product Definitions

FDA Update Website on Combination Product Definitions

Full Site Here

Combination products are defined in 21 CFR 3.2(e).  The term combination product includes:

(1) A product comprised of two or more regulated components, i.e., drug/device, biologic/device, drug/biologic, or drug/device/biologic, that are physically, chemically, or otherwise combined or mixed and produced as a single entity;

(2) Two or more separate products packaged together in a single package or as a unit and comprised of drug and device products, device and biological products, or biological and drug products;

(3) A drug, device, or biological product packaged separately that according to its investigational plan or proposed labeling is intended for use only with an approved individually specified drug, device, or biological product where both are required to achieve the intended use, indication, or effect and where upon approval of the proposed product the labeling of the approved product would need to be changed, e.g., to reflect a change in intended use, dosage form, strength, route of administration, or significant change in dose; or

(4) Any investigational drug, device, or biological product packaged separately that according to its proposed labeling is for use only with another individually specified investigational drug, device, or biological product where both are required to achieve the intended use, indication, or effect.



For Assistance with Drug Device Combinations Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

FDA Publish Rules on PET Drugs GMP

FDA Publish Rules on PET Drugs GMP

Full Text Here

This guidance is intended to help small businesses better understand and comply with the regulations issued by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) concerning current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) for positron emission tomography (PET) drugs. The guidance addresses resources, procedures, and documentation for all PET drug production facilities. In some cases, the guidance provides practical examples of methods or procedures that PET drug production facilities can use to comply with the CGMP requirements. FDA has prepared this guidance in accordance with section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (Public Law 104-121).
FDA’s guidance documents, including this guidance, should not be viewed as establishing legally enforceable responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the Agency’s current thinking on a topic and should be viewed only as recommendations. The use of the word should in Agency guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but not required.

Section 121(c)(1)(A) of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 (the Modernization Act) directed FDA to establish CGMP requirements for PET drugs. FDA established these requirements in 21 CFR part 212

As directed by Congress in the Modernization Act, to help in developing the PET CGMP regulations and this guidance, we closely examined the operations of many PET drug producers, including not-for-profit institutions and commercial manufacturers. Since the Modernization Act became law, significant changes have occurred in PET drug production in the United States. The number of PET drug production facilities has increased, as has the number of facilities where PET scans are performed. The business of PET drug production has changed as well. Historically, PET drugs were produced by academicians and researchers at PET drug production facilities located in universities and similar not-for-profit institutions. An academically oriented PET drug production facility usually produces small amounts (a few doses per day) of a few PET drugs for on-site patient use and a larger variety of PET drugs for clinical investigation and academic research.

An increasing number of PET drug production facilities are now operated by for-profit corporate entities that contract with academic and medical institutions (many of which have not-for-profit status) to manage the production of PET drugs at those institutions. Most of these PET drugs are administered on site, although often there is some distribution to other local or regional hospitals. In addition, a growing number of independent PET drug production facilities are not affiliated with any university or hospital. These for-profit, often contractually managed, and independently operated PET drug production facilities distribute PET drugs to significantly greater numbers of patients, sometimes hundreds of miles from the production site.

Our review of PET drug production has led to the conclusion that a PET drug producer’s status as either a not-for-profit or for-profit entity has little bearing on the quality of PET drugs that it produces and distributes for administration to patients, or on the methods, facilities, and controls that a PET drug production facility needs to ensure product quality. Instead, production and CGMP differences among PET drug producers are primarily a function of the size, scope, and complexity of their production operations. We have also found that implementing certain production standards and controls can ensure the production of quality PET drugs, regardless of differences among the various PET drug production facilities. The Agency believes that the welfare of a patient undergoing a PET scan should not depend on where a particular PET drug was produced.

 

<!– Place this tag where you want the +1 button to render –>

<g:plusone></g:plusone>

 

<!– Place this tag after the last plusone tag –>

<script type=”text/javascript”>

  (function() {

    var po = document.createElement(‘script’); po.type = ‘text/javascript’; po.async = true;

    po.src = ‘https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js’;

    var s = document.getElementsByTagName(‘script’)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(po, s);

  })();

</script>

 

<div id=”fb-root”></div><script src=”http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#appId=194100293982344&amp;xfbml=1″></script><fb:like href=”http://www.damienbove.com” send=”true” width=”450″ show_faces=”true” font=”"></fb:like>

 

<h2>For Assistance with<a title=”Drug,Biotechnology,Device Development Consultancy” href=”http://www.damienbove.com/drug-development-and-planning-services/” target=”_blank”> Submitting Evidence to NICE</a> Click Here</h2>

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

<h1>Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!</h1>

<!– VZAAR START –>

<div class=”vzaar_media_player”><object id=”video” classid=”clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000″ width=”462″ height=”266″ codebase=”http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0″><param name=”data” value=”http://view.vzaar.com/314932.flashplayer” /><param name=”allowScriptAccess” value=”always” /><param name=”allowFullScreen” value=”true” /><param name=”wmode” value=”transparent” /><param name=”flashvars” value=”endText=Don%27t+forget+to+sign+up+for+our+FREE+regulatory+watch+newsletter%21&amp;colourSet=orange&amp;endLink=www.damienbove.com&amp;brandText=IDA+Consultants+-+Damien+Bove&amp;autoplay=true&amp;brandLink=www.damienbove.com” /><param name=”src” value=”http://view.vzaar.com/314932.flashplayer” /><param name=”allowfullscreen” value=”true” /><embed id=”video” type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” width=”462″ height=”266″ src=”http://view.vzaar.com/314932.flashplayer” flashvars=”endText=Don%27t+forget+to+sign+up+for+our+FREE+regulatory+watch+newsletter%21&amp;colourSet=orange&amp;endLink=www.damienbove.com&amp;brandText=IDA+Consultants+-+Damien+Bove&amp;autoplay=true&amp;brandLink=www.damienbove.com” wmode=”transparent” allowfullscreen=”true” allowscriptaccess=”always” data=”http://view.vzaar.com/314932.flashplayer”></embed></object></div>

<!– VZAAR END –>

 

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free.  We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between <em>20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month</em>, and summaries them in a fantastic <strong>FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up</strong>. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. <em>Just fill in the form below</em>.

<div id=”formContainer”>

<h2 class=”widgettitle”>Fill Out the Short Form Below…</h2>

<form class=”cform” action=”http://www.damienbove.com/cgi-bin/arp3/arp3-formcapture.pl” method=”post”>

<ol class=”cf-ol”>

            <li id=”li–1″> <label for=”cf_field_1″><span>First name</span></label>

<input class=”single fldrequired” name=”first_name” size=”20″ type=”text” /> <span class=”reqtxt”>(required)</span></li>

            <li id=”li–2″> <label><span>Phone #1</span></label>

<input class=”single fldemail fldrequired” name=”phone1″ size=”20″ type=”text” /></li>

            <li id=”li–3″> <label><span>E-mail address</span></label>

<input class=”single” name=”email” size=”20″ type=”text” /> <span class=”emailreqtxt”>(valid email required)</span></li>

</ol>

<input name=”subscription_type” type=”hidden” value=”E” />

<p class=”cf-sb”><input id=”sendbutton” class=”sendbutton” type=”submit” value=”Yes Please, Sign Me Up Damien!” /></p>

<input name=”id” type=”hidden” value=”7″ /> <input name=”extra_ar” type=”hidden” />

 

</form></div>

<em>“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”</em>



For Assistance with Registering PET drugs Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

MHRA Publish Document on Classification Rules

MHRA Publish Document on Classification Rules

Full Text Here

This information bulletin is the tenth in a series and sets out to explain in broad terms the rules in Annex IX of the Medical Devices Directive (93/42/EEC, published in the Official Journal on 12 July 1993 (L169) concerning the Classification of devices covered by that Directive and how they are designed to work. It is not intended to be a complete and definitive statement

The Directive covers a vast range of products from first-aid bandages and walking frames to CT scanners and non-active implants. While the use of many of these presents no danger, others may carry significant risks to patients or users. However, to apply the strictest controls to all products would require some manufacturers to set up additional, costly, and unnecessary procedures. It is important, therefore, that the level of control is matched, as far as possible, to the degree of risk inherent in the device. Attempts were therefore made to set the controls relative to the perceived risk in an effort to make them as relaxed as possible (thus easing the bureaucratic and financial burdens on business) and as strict as necessary (thus ensuring that the health of the patient and user is adequately protected)



For Assistance with Registering a Device in the UK or EU Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

FDA Publish 510K Guidance – When to Submit a 510K for a Change

FDA Publish 510K Guidance – When to Submit a 510K for a Change

FDA developed this draft document to provide guidance to manufacturers on when to submit a premarket notification submission (510(k)) for changes or modifications made to that manufacturer’s1 previously cleared medical device. The underlying principles that FDA uses to determine when a 510(k) is necessary for a modified device are explained here, and examples are provided for additional clarity. When final, this guidance will supersede the 1997 version of the guidance document, Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device.
In 2010, FDA initiated a review of its process for premarket review of medical devices and undertook two significant initiatives to improve the Agency’s medical device premarket review programs. In August 2010, FDA released two reports, including the analyses and recommendations that suggested changes were needed to improve the predictability, consistency, and transparency of these programs. After receiving input from industry, stakeholders and the public, in January 2011, FDA announced 25 specific actions that the Agency will take to improve the premarket review programs. Updating the 1997 version of the guidance document, Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device, is one of these actions.

The recommendations in this draft guidance document are consistent with FDA policy for when a modification to a device does – and does not – require the submission of a 510(k).

The guidance has been updated, however, to address issues associated with software and other rapidly changing technologies, and to provide greater clarity about changes that do not trigger the need for a new premarket submission. This guidance uses examples of modifications to devices involving such technologies to illustrate changes that require a new 510(k), and changes that may simply be documented in accordance with a manufacturer’s existing Quality System without prompting the need for a new 510(k) submission. FDA believes increased certainty about the regulatory conseque



For Assistance with Registering and Maintaing Device Submissions Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

The EC Publishes Draft Regulation on Electronig Instructions for use of Medical Devices

The EC Publishes Draft Regulation on Electronic Instructions for use of Medical Devices

Full Text Here

The draft Regulation sets out conditions according to which instructions for use in paper form may be replaced by electronic instructions for use. It limits the possibility of providing instructions for use in electronic form to defined medical devices and accessories intended to be used in specific conditions. Furthermore, it contains a range of procedural safeguards. Thus instructions for use have to be provided in paper form on request, and a specific risk assessment by the manufacturer and information on how to access to the instructions for use is needed. The draft Regulation also sets up a few basic safety requirements for: - instructions for use in electronic form which are provided in addition to complete instructions for use in paper form, and - websites containing such instructions for use.

For Assistance with Submitting Evidence to NICE Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

FDA Publishes Guidance on Interpretation of Chemical Action, under definition of device.

FDA Publishes Guidance on Interpretation of Chemical Action, under definition of device.

Full Text Here

This guidance provides information about how FDA interprets the term “chemical action” in the device definition at section 201(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act), 21 U.S.C. § 321(h). The Agency is issuing a companion draft guidance Classification of Products as Drugs and Devices and Associated Product Classification Issues, (“Draft Classification Guidance”) (available on OCP’s website at http://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/default.htm), that addresses how FDA interprets other language in the device definition.

Section 201(h) of the FD&C Act (21 USC 321(h)) provides that the term “device” means:
… an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or other similar or related article, including any component, part, or accessory, which is–
(1) recognized in the official National Formulary, or the United States Pharmacopeia, or any supplement to them,
(2) intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or other animals, or
(3) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals, and
which does not achieve its primary intended purposes through chemical action within or on the body of man or other animals and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of its primary intended purposes. (emphasis added).
Under this definition, a product (or a constituent part of a combination product)2 is not a device if it “achieve[s] its primary intended purposes through chemical action within or on the body of man or other animals.” FDA frequently receives questions from product developers concerning the Agency’s interpretation of the term “chemical action” in this definition. This guidance describes the agency’s interpretation of the term “chemical action.” However, the term “chemical action” must be read in the context of the statutory definition of “device” as a whole. As described in the Draft Classification Guidance, the determination of whether a product meets the device definition does not depend solely on whether the product exhibits “chemical action.” For example, a product that exhibits chemical action within or on the body of man may meet the device definition if the product “does not achieve its primary intended purposes through” that chemical action.

For Assistance with Regulatory Strategy for Device/Drug/Combination Products Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

FDA Issues Guidance on Classification of Products as Drugs and Devices & Additional Product Classification Issues

FDA Issues Guidance on Classification of Products as Drugs and Devices & Additional Product Classification Issues

Full Text Here

FDA regularly receives requests from medical product developers concerning the classification of their products. We believe that efficient, effective regulation of such products is facilitated by providing guidance on issues frequently raised in relation to such requests. Certain issues have arisen often relating to whether a product should be classified as a drug or a device. Accordingly, this guidance focuses particularly on when a product may be classified as a drug or a device. This guidance also addresses additional issues relating to product classification, including how to obtain a formal classification determination from FDA for a medical product and the status of prior Agency determinations concerning product classification.
This guidance is organized into three substantive sections.
Section II offers guidance on the process to obtain a formal determination of whether a product is classified as a drug, device, biological product, or combination product.
Section III provides some general concepts for making classification determinations and addresses specific issues arise in determining whether products should be classified as drugs or devices

Section IV of this document provides an overview of the status of the current intercenter jurisdictional agreements, classifications that have been made by regulation, and classifications the Agency has made for a product that does not fall within the scope of a regulation, for example, by granting a marketing authorization or in responding to a request for designation.
The Agency recommends that manufacturers contact the Office of Combination Products (OCP) to confirm the classification of any products they may wish to market if the appropriate classification appears unclear for any reason. Section V provides contact information for OCP.

For Assistance with Development of Drug Device Combinations Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

FDA Publish Guidance on Processing/Reprocessing Medical Devices in Health Care Settings

FDA Publish Guidance on Processing/Reprocessing Medical Devices in Health Care Settings

Full Text Here

When final, this guidance will supersede Labeling Reusable Medical Devices for Reprocessing in Health Care Facilities: FDA Reviewer Guidance. This draft guidance document updates and clarifies the recommended content of, and review procedures for, premarket notification submissions [510(k)], premarket approval (PMA) applications, humanitarian device exemption (HDE) applications, and investigational device exemptions applications (IDE), concerning the labeling instructions for reprocessing reusable medical devices. In addition, this draft document provides more detail about FDA’s recommendations for the validation of processes intended to support reprocessing.

For Assistance with FDA Regulation of Medical Devices Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

NICE Publish Guidance on Endovascular Stent-Grafting of Popliteal Aneurysms

NICE Publish Guidance on Endovascular Stent-Grafting of Popliteal Aneurysms

Current evidence on endovascular stent-grafting of popliteal aneurysms is limited in quantity but shows no major safety concerns. Evidence on efficacy is inadequate because it is limited to the short-term. Therefore this procedure should only be used with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent and audit or research.

Clinicians wishing to undertake endovascular stent-grafting of popliteal aneurysms should take the following actions.

• Inform the clinical governance leads in their Trusts.
• Ensure that patients and their carers understand the uncertainty about the procedure’s long-term efficacy and provide them with clear written information. In addition, the use of NICE’s information for patients (‘Understanding NICE guidance’) is recommended (available from www.nice.org.uk/guidance/IPG390/publicinfo).
• Audit and review clinical outcomes of all patients having endovascular stent-grafting of popliteal aneurysms (see section 3.1).

Patient selection for this procedure should be carried out by a multidisciplinary team which should include a vascular surgeon and an interventional radiologist with specific training and experience in the technique.

NICE encourages research into endovascular stentgrafting of popliteal aneurysms and may review this procedure on publication of further evidence.

For Assistance with Submitting Evidence to NICE Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

NICE Publish Guidance on Carotid Artery Stent Placement in Extracranial Carotid Stenosis

NICE Publish Guidance on Carotid Artery Stent Placement in Extracranial Carotid Stenosis

Current evidence on the safety and efficacy of carotid artery stent placement for symptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis is adequate to support the use of this procedure provided that normal arrangements are in place for clinical governance and audit or research.

During the consent process, clinicians should ensure that patients understand the risk of stroke and other complications associated with this procedure. Clinicians should also ensure that patients understand the reasons for advising carotid artery stent placement rather than endarterectomy in their particular case.

Patient selection should be carried out by a multidisciplinary team, which should include an interventional radiologist or a neuroradiologist, a vascular surgeon and a physician with a specialist interest in stroke.

This procedure should only be carried out by clinicians with specific training and expertise in the technique who regularly perform complex endovascular interventions. The Royal College of Radiologists has produced training standards.

For Assistance with Submitting Evidence to NICE Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

NICE publish Guidance on Carotid Artery Stent Placement

NICE publish Guidance on Carotid Artery Stent Placement

Current evidence on the safety of carotid artery stent placement for asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis shows well-documented risks, in particular the risk of stroke. The evidence on efficacy is inadequate in quantity. Therefore this procedure should only be used with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent and audit or research. Clinicians wishing to undertake carotid artery stent placement for asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis should take the following actions.

• Ensure that patients and their carers understand the uncertainty about the procedure’s efficacy, the risk of stroke and other complications, and the reasons for advising stenting rather than endarterectomy or best medical treatment alone in their particular case. Patients should be provided with clear written information. In addition, the use of NICE’s information for patients (‘Understanding NICE guidance’) is recommended (available from www.nice.org.uk/guidance/IPG388/publicinfo)

Patient selection should be carried out by a multidisciplinary team, which should include an interventional radiologist or a neuroradiologist, a vascular surgeon and a physician with specialist interest in stroke. Cardiac surgeons and cardiologists should liaise with the multidisciplinary team in relation to patients being considered for this procedure as a prelude to cardiac surgery. This procedure should only be carried out by clinicians with specific training and expertise in the technique who regularly perform complex endovascular interventions. The Royal College of Radiologists has produced training standards.

NICE encourages clinicians either to enter patients into the ACST-2 trial (Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Surgery Trial 2; www.nds.ox.ac.uk/acst) or to submit data to the Endovascular Carotid Register, run by the British Society of Interventional Radiology and the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland (www.bsir.org and www.vascularsociety.org.uk). NICE may review this procedure on publication of further evidence.

For Assistance with Submitting Evidence to NICE Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

NICE Publish Guidance on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Failure

NICE Publish Guidance on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Failure

Full Text Here

Evidence on the safety of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for severe acute respiratory failure in adults is adequate but shows that there is a risk of serious side effects. Evidence on its efficacy is inadequate to draw firm conclusions: data from the recent CESAR (Conventional ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure) trial were difficult to interpret because different management strategies were applied among many different hospitals in the control group and a single centre was used for the ECMO treatment group. Therefore this procedure should only be used with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent and research.

Clinicians wishing to undertake ECMO for severe acute respiratory failure in adults should take the following actions.
• Inform the clinical governance leads in their Trusts.
• Whenever possible, ensure that patients and their carers understand the uncertainty about the procedure’s efficacy and its risks and provide them with clear written information. In
addition, the use of NICE’s information for patients (‘Understanding NICE guidance’) is recommended (available from www.nice.org.uk/guidance/IPG391/publicinfo).

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory failure in adults should only be carried out by clinical teams with specific training and expertise in the procedure.

Clinicians are encouraged to submit data on all adults undergoing ECMO for severe acute respiratory failure to the international Extracorporeal Life Support Organization register (www.elso.med.umich.edu).

NICE encourages further research into the use of innovative technologies for the management of severe acute respiratory failure, and may review this guidance on publication of further evidence.

For Assistance with Submitting Evidence to NICE Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

Fill Out the Short Form Below…


  1. (required)


  2. (valid email required)

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”