EMA, The European Drug Regulator, Publishes Concept Paper on the Revision of the Note for Guidance on the Quality of Modified Release Oral Dosage Forms and Transdermal Dosage Forms: Section I (Quality)
Full Text here
The Note for Guidance on modified release products addresses specific quality requirement for modified release products, particularly the in vitro testing. The NfG focus primarily on oral dosage forms including both prolonged and delayed release formulations. However there is room for further guidance particularly in relation to the choice of the appropriate dissolution test and media, details on the development of in vivo/in vitro correlation and new technologies. The requirements for transdermal dosage forms are only briefly described in the document. As such, a more elaborated chapter on transdermal patches is needed in this guideline with special focus on the interchangeability aspects for generic transdermal patches.
Oral formulations are still the most common pharmaceutical dosage form, even among the newly introduced drugs, and will probably continue to be in the next few years. Several Modified Release (MR) technologies (e.g., hydrophilic matrix tablets, osmotic systems, and coated multiparticulates) are well established and well understood.
In vitro dissolution test is often used during development and quality control as a predictive tool to indicate changes which may have an effect on the efficacy or safety of the product and can also be used as a surrogate for in vivo testing when in vitro-in vivo correlations are developed. However the estimation of the release and dissolution of the drug in the intestinal fluid (and the permeation of the intestinal mucosa) with in vitro techniques that are not biorelevant can be misleading in some cases according to the properties of the drug and the formulation. At the same time, developments in formulation and specific types of excipients have led to more complicated MR dosage forms. On the other hand, new drug substances rarely exhibit good solubility (classified as Class II compounds in BCS) and their development as Modified Release forms can be challenging in terms of achievement of in vivo and/or in vitro release. MR products can also present unique challenges when it comes to establishing therapeutic equivalence between two formulations.
In addition, the new quality paradigm –Quality by Design- and new technologies in this respect (e.g. PAT) can be used to provide in vitro-in vivo relationships based on the performance of individual dosage form units, or to set up dissolution specifications.
As a result of the interaction of alcohol with modified release oral dosage forms containing strong opioids which lead to “dose dumping” of opioids for some (generic) products, it has become necessary to review the requirements for in vitro or in vivo data for all modified release products.
Taking into account the above it is deduced that there is a need to provide further guidance and elaborate the specific requirements in relation to these points.
Following recent scientific developments and increased number of transdermal patches applications for marketing authorisation, it has become necessary to further illustrate the specific requirements for this dosage form. Although section four of the current guideline attempts to describe the requirements for transdermal dosage forms, clear guidance on limits, e.g., for patch size and drug load versus total amount released are not specified. In addition, the specific requirements for dissolution methods for transdermal patches should be described in greater detail. Finally, skin adhesion properties are not fully addressed and no mention is made to the in vitro methodologies and in vivo testing to assess and control skin adhesion. Especially the concept of generics and interchangeability of transdermal patch formulations has generated the need for further clarification and guidance. The issue regarding interchangeability should be discussed in a separate subsection of this guideline since the objectives of pharmaceutical development differ for those type of products. A patch formulation using an active substance for the first time can hardly be evaluated based on certain standard requirements, although the methods applied to establish and describe the patch formulations characteristics should be based in general on standardized procedures. In contrast to this individual case evaluation, generic patch development needs to be focussed on comparability aspects. Certain standard requirements have to be established to facilitate the decision making process when it comes to evaluation of product equivalence between originator and the generic patch formulation. Due to the particularities of the transdermal route and its underlying principles of release from the formulation, interchangeability of transdermal patch products is not solely depending on the proof of bioequivalence as known for oral modified release products. Adhesion as well as skin irritation properties might have a significant impact on the in-vivo release characteristics of a patch formulation.
For CMC Consulting Services Click Here
Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.
Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!
Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.
“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”
For Assistance with Regulatory Planning and Exicution of Clinical Trials Click Here
Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.
Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!
Fill Out the Short Form Below… |
Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.
“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”