Monthly Archives: May 2010

Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Reflection Paper on in-vitro Cultured Chondrocyte Containing Products for Cartilage Repair of the Knee

Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Reflection Paper on in-vitro Cultured Chondrocyte Containing Products for Cartilage Repair of the Knee

Full Text Here

This reflection paper addresses specific points related to medicinal products containing in vitro cultured autologous chondrocytes intended for the repair of cartilage lesions of the knee. This reflection paper is considered to supplement the ‘Guideline on human cell-based medicinal products’ (EMEA/CHMP/410869/2006) and therefore it should be read in conjunction with the guideline.

Click Here For – Biotech Development Services- Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Reflection Paper on in vitro Cultured Chondrocyte Containing Products for Cartilage Repair of the Knee

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Reflection Paper on in vitro Cultured Chondrocyte Containing Products for Cartilage Repair of the Knee

Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Draft Guidance on the Use of PharmacoGenetic Methodologies in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Medicinal Products

Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Draft Guidance on the Use of PharmacoGenetic Methodologies in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Medicinal Products.

Full Text Here

This guideline addresses the influence of pharmacogenetics on drug pharmacokinetics, encompassing considerations and requirements for the design and conduct of investigations during drug development. In particular, guidance is given regarding studies required and recommended at different phases of drug development to ensure satisfactory efficacy and safety in pharmacogenetic subpopulations that have variable systemic exposure of active substances.

The pharmacokinetics of many medicinal products is prone to interindividual variability, which is caused by several factors such as gender, age, weight, renal and hepatic function, and genetics. In recent years, a rapid development in our understanding of the influence of genes on interindividual differences in drug action has occurred. This development encompasses the area of pharmacogenomics, including pharmacogenetics, where interindividual variability in genes influencing or predicting the outcome of drug treatment (e.g., genes encoding drug transporters, drug metabolising enzymes, drug targets, biomarker genes) is studied in relation to efficacy of drug treatment and adverse drug reactions. A great deal of this interindividual variability is caused by genetic polymorphism, i.e. the occurrence in the same population of multiple allelic states. Genetic variations are demonstrated by the identification of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions/deletions and variation in gene copy number (copy number variation, CNV).

With respect to pharmacokinetics, the highest level of polymorphism is found in genes involved in drug metabolism; phase I metabolism of approximately 40% of clinically used drugs is due to polymorphic enzymes. Currently, the most important polymorphic enzymes are the cytochrome P450 enzymes such as CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6. Subjects who have extensive and poor metabolising capacity for these enzymes are present in the general population. For CYP2D6, besides the poor metaboliser phenotype, the ultrarapid metaboliser phenotype is relevant as well. With respect to phase II enzymes, the genetic variability of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases, N-acetyltransferase-2 and some methyltransferases has been linked to interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. The metabolising enzymes account for 80% of the drugs which currently include pharmacogenetic data in their labelling.

Among the major clinically relevant issues is pharmacogenetic variability causing increased or decreased metabolism of the parent drug and the subsequent formation of active or toxic substances. Decreased metabolism can cause too high levels of the parent drug and adverse drug reactions. Elevated drug metabolism can cause loss of response or, in case of prodrug activation, too high levels of the bioactive compound.

The interindividual genetically linked differences in pharmacokinetics may cause, clinically, very relevant alterations in drug action. Optimal efficacy is dependent on appropriate dosing, often based on the specific genotype. Thus, the effective dose may vary greatly due to increased or decreased drug elimination rate. For instance, due to CYP2D6 polymorphism, the rate of hepatic metabolism of drugs which are substrates for this enzyme can vary 1000-fold between individuals. Among many antidepressants and antipsychotics, the plasma levels of the drug at the same dosage often vary 5-20-fold. A 9-fold higher risk of suicide has been reported among ultrarapid metabolisers of CYP2D6 and there are also many reports of increased frequency of adverse drug reactions among subjects with the poor metaboliser phenotype, due to increased systemic exposure of the parent drug. Furthermore, increased side effects after treatment with analgesic drugs, which are activated by CYP2D6, are seen among ultrarapid metabolisers. The efficacy of prodrugs which are activated by polymorphic enzymes varies depending on the pharmacogenetics of the patients. An example of this is clopidogrel, for which an increased frequency in serious side effects due to excessive prodrug activation has been seen in patients with increased formation of the active metabolite and a corresponding lack of effect in subjects without the appropriate enzyme. Dosing of some important anticoagulants is dependent on the CYP2C9 genotype of the patient and the platelet inhibition action of some drugs is dependent on the CYP2C19 genotype. Overall, it can be estimated that 20-25 % of the efficacy of all drug treatment is significantly affected by interindividual differences in genes encoding drug metabolising enzymes.

In recent years, journal articles have been published describing specific polymorphisms in drug transporters and their possible effect on the efficacy and safety of medicinal products. However, in the majority of cases the influence of transporter polymorphism on drug pharmacokinetics has not yet been clarified. The effect of transporter polymorphism on drug pharmacokinetics is thought to be of less importance, or is still unknown, compared with polymorphic enzymes. This is partly due to the fact that the role of specific transporters in vivo is difficult to quantify due to the lack of specific inhibitorsand the polymorphism seen in the transporters is often substrate specific in its effects. The possibility of transporter polymorphism as a cause of altered pharmacokinetics must, however, always be considered in all phases of drug development. It is anticipated that this area will expand a great deal in the near future, as knowledge of the role of drug transporters is rapidly developing.
At present, an increasing proportion of lead compounds selected for further development are metabolised by enzymes or transported by transporter proteins upon which the impact of pharmacogenetics is unknown. New technologies, such as rapid genome sequencing, whole genome wide association studies (GWAS) and targeted absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) gene SNP/CNV analyses, are expected to have an integral role in clinical drug development in the future.
Until now, it has been difficult to transfer knowledge of the effect of polymorphism into specific recommendations in affected genetic subpopulations1. In this respect, genetic subpopulations have been treated differently than other subpopulations or circumstances in which the exposure of active or toxic substances is increased. The aim of including pharmacokinetics-related pharmacogenetics in drug development is to evaluate whether exposure in genetic subpopulations is different to such an extent that this would require a change in the posology or treatment recommendation of the drug for the specific subpopulation. This document, therefore, aims to clarify the studies needed to investigate these issues.

Click Here for – Pre-Clinical (ICH M3) Services – Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Draft Guidance on the Use of PharmacoGenetic Methodologies in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Medicinal Products

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Draft Guidance on the Use of PharmacoGenetic Methodologies in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Medicinal Products

Reminder – MHRA Payment Easements for Small Companies – Definition of a small company

Reminder – MHRA Payment Easements for Small Companies – Definition of a small company

The Agency’s fees legislation currently has provision for some payment easements for small companies in relation to a number of capital fees.
Applications for payment easements available to small companies must be made in writing to Ciaran Hughes, including a copy of the last audited accounts, at Market Towers, 1 Nine Elms Lane, London SW8 5NQ. A “small company” is defined in the Companies Act 1985 (as amended). Under the MHRA’s fees regulations (Reg 41, SI 2009 No 389), a company will be eligible to be considered for the payment easements if, for the financial year before that in which the application is made:
. • the amount of its turnover for that financial year is not more than
. • £5.6m; and
. • its balance sheet total is not more that £2.8m; or
. • the average number of persons employed (on a weekly basis) during the previous financial year did not exceed 50.
The easements include payment of:
. • 25% of the application fee for a new active substance at the time of the application with the remaining 75% payable within 30 days of the MA being determined;
. • 25% of the application fee relating to outgoing MR applications for new active substances at time of application and 75% payable within 30 days following written notification from the licensing authority that the regulatory assistance is at an end;
. • 50% for most other outgoing MR applications at time of application and 50% payable within 30 days following notification written notification from the licensing
authority that the regulatory assistance is at an end;
. • 50% at time of application for Manufacturers’ or Wholesale Dealer’s licences with 50% payable 12 months after that time.

The “50% rule” at time of application, then 50% payable 12 months after that timealso applies to the payment of:
• Applications for traditional herbal medicines registrations and applications for complex variations to traditional herbal registrations. In respect to inspection fees in connection with applications for a marketing authorization, traditional herbal registration, manufacturer’s licence, manufacturer’s authorisation, the fee payable in respect of an inspection at any site other than one named as a possible site for manufacture of a medicinal product by three or more applicants shall if the applicant requests in writing by payable as to 50% within 14 days following receipt of written notice requiring those fees, with 50% payable 12 months after  that date.

Click Here for – Regulatory Services – Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Reminder   MHRA Payment Easements for Small Companies   Definition of a small company

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Reminder   MHRA Payment Easements for Small Companies   Definition of a small company

Drug Regulators,FDA, Publish ICH Questions and Answers, Q8,Q9 and Q10

Drug Regulators,FDA, Publish ICH  Questions and Answers, Q8,Q9 and Q10

Full Text Here

Since the Q8, Q9, and Q10 guidances were made final, experiences implementing the guidances in the ICH regions have given rise to requests for clarification. This question and answer (Q&A) document is intended to clarify key issues. The guidance reflects the current working procedure of the ICH Quality Implementation Working Group (Q-IWG) for implementing the Q8, Q9, and Q10 guidances.
The benefits of harmonizing technical requirements across the ICH regions can be realized only if the various quality ICH guidances are implemented and interpreted in a consistent way across the three regions. The Q-IWG is tasked to develop Q&As to facilitate implementation of existing quality guidance.

Q8 (R2) Pharmaceutical Development (includes the Q8 parent guidance (Part I) and the annex (Part II), which provides further clarification of the Q8 parent guidance and describes the principles of quality by design)

Q9 Quality Risk Management

Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality Systems

Click Here for – Drug Development Services – Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators,FDA, Publish ICH  Questions and Answers, Q8,Q9 and Q10

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators,FDA, Publish ICH  Questions and Answers, Q8,Q9 and Q10

Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Q4B Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in the ICH Regions; Annex 6: Uniformity of Dosage Unites General Chapter

Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Q4B Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in the ICH Regions; Annex 6: Uniformity of Dosage Unites General Chapter

Full Text Here

This annex is the result of the Q4B process for Uniformity of Dosage Units. The proposed texts were submitted by the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group (PDG).

Q4B OUTCOME
Analytical Procedures

The ICH Steering Committee, based on the evaluation by the Q4B Expert Working Group (EWG), recommends that the official pharmacopoeial texts, Ph.Eur. 2.9.40. Uniformity of Dosage Units, JP 6.02 Uniformity of Dosage Units, and USP General Chapter <905> Uniformity of Dosage Units, can be used as interchangeable in the ICH regions subject to the following conditions:

The Uniformity of Dosage Unit test is not considered to be interchangeable in the three regions unless the target test sample amount at time of manufacture (T) is 100% (i.e., T=100%).

Unless the 25 milligrams (mg)/25% threshold limit is met, the use of theMass/Weight Variation test as an alternative test for Content Uniformity is not considered interchangeable in all ICH regions.

For specific dosage forms which have been indicated in local text in the pharmacopoeias by enclosing the text within the black diamond symbols, application of the Uniformity of Dosage Units test is not considered interchangeable in all ICH regions.

For Mass/Weight Variation, the PDG-harmonised definition for ‘W Bar’ should be used.

If a correction factor is called for when different procedures are used for assay of the preparation and for the Content Uniformity Test, the correction factor should be specified and justified in the application dossier.

Acceptance Criteria
The acceptance criteria are harmonized between the three pharmacopoeias.

Click Here for – CMC Help and Advice – Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Q4B Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in the ICH Regions; Annex 6: Uniformity of Dosage Unites General Chapter

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Q4B Evaluation and Recommendation of Pharmacopoeial Texts for Use in the ICH Regions; Annex 6: Uniformity of Dosage Unites General Chapter

Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Guidance on Requalification Method for Reentry of Blood Donors Deferred Because of Reactive Test Results for Antibody to Hepatitis B Core Antigen (Anti-HBc).

Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Guidance on Requalification Method for Reentry of Blood Donors Deferred Because of Reactive Test Results for Antibody to Hepatitis B Core Antigen (Anti-HBc).

Full Text Here

The FDA, are issuing this guidance to provide, establishments that collect Whole Blood or blood components intended for transfusion, with recommendations for a requalification method or process for the reentry of deferred donors into the donor pool based on a determination that previous tests that were repeatedly reactive for antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) were falsely positive and that there is no evidence of infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV). Currently, donors who are repeatedly reactive on more than one occasion for anti-HBc (samples from more than one collection from the same donor are repeatedly reactive for anti-HBc) must be indefinitely deferred in accordance with Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations, section 610.41(a) (21 CFR 610.41(a)). Although it may seem unlikely that two anti-HBc tests would be falsely positive, such situations have occurred with some frequency because of the relative non-specificity of these tests. The result is that many otherwise suitable donors are indefinitely deferred because of their anti-HBc test results, even though medical follow-up of such donors indicates that they are not infected with HBV. The availability of FDA-licensed hepatitis B virus nucleic acid tests (HBV NAT), which are particularly sensitive when single samples are tested, provides an additional, powerful method of determining whether a donor who has been deferred because of anti-HBc reactivity is truly infected with HBV. Due to the availability of FDA-licensed HBV NAT and the improved specificity of anti-HBc assays, we are recommending in this guidance a reentry algorithm for donors deferred due to falsely positive repeatedly reactive tests for anti-HBc. This guidance finalizes the draft guidance of the same title dated May 2008.

Click Here for  – Drug Development Services – Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Guidance on Requalification Method for Reentry of Blood Donors Deferred Because of Reactive Test Results for Antibody to Hepatitis B Core Antigen (Anti HBc).

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Guidance on Requalification Method for Reentry of Blood Donors Deferred Because of Reactive Test Results for Antibody to Hepatitis B Core Antigen (Anti HBc).

Testamonial From Edinburgh University

I really enjoyed attending the ‘Regulations of First in Man Clinical Studies’. The course contains a huge amount of information but the format of the course enabled everyone to ask questions and use personal examples – it did not matter if you had clinical trial experience or were a novice like me. Tony and Damien encouraged group participation and the course material and handouts such as application forms as well as ethical requirements will be extremely valuable for the future. I will definitely be able to apply the knowledge that I have gained from this course into working practice.

Jennifer Cusiter – Enterprise Associate, Entrepreneur in Residence Team, University of Edinburgh

JC Photo Testamonial From Edinburgh University

Click Here for – Course Details - Click Here

Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Guidance for Industry: Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV): Testing, Product Disposition, and Donor Deferral and Reentry; Availablity.

Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Guidance for Industry: Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV): Testing, Product Disposition, and Donor Deferral and Reentry; Availability.

Full Text Here

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the availability of a document entitled ‘‘Guidance for Industry: Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV– 1) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV): Testing, Product Disposition, and Donor Deferral and Reentry’’ dated May 2010. The guidance document provides recommendations to blood and plasma establishments, manufacturers, and testing laboratories that are implementing a licensed method for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV–1) Nucleic Acid Test (NAT) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) NAT, on testing individual samples or pooled samples from donors of human blood and blood components for HIV–1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) and HCV RNA. This guidance also contains recommendations regarding product disposition and donor management based on the results of NAT and serologic testing for markers of HIV–1 and HCV infection on samples, collected at the time of donation, from donors of human blood and blood components. The guidance announced in this notice finalizes the draft guidance of the same title, dated July 2005. This guidance also supersedes the recommendations for reentry of donors deferred because of anti-HIV–1 test results, HIV–1 p24 antigen test results, and anti-HCV test results that were provided in the FDA  memoranda entitled ‘‘Revised Recommendations for the Prevention of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV–1) Transmission by Blood and Blood Products,’’ April 23,  1992; ‘‘Revised Recommendations for Testing Whole Blood, Blood Components, Source Plasma and Source Leukocytes for Antibody to Hepatitis C Virus Encoded Antigen (Anti-HCV),’’ August 5, 1993; ‘‘Recommendations for Donor Screening with a Licensed Test for HIV–1 Antigen,’’ August 8, 1995.

Click Here for – Drug / Biotech Development Services – Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Guidance for Industry: Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV 1) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV): Testing, Product Disposition, and Donor Deferral and Reentry; Availablity.

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Guidance for Industry: Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV 1) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV): Testing, Product Disposition, and Donor Deferral and Reentry; Availablity.

Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Guidance on Requalification Method for Reentry of Blood Donors Deferred Because of Reactive Test Results for Antibody to Hepatitis B Core Antigen (Anti-HBc); Availability.

Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Guidance on Requalification Method for Reentry of Blood Donors Deferred Because of Reactive Test Results for Antibody to Hepatitis B Core Antigen (Anti-HBc); Availability.

Full Text Here

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the availability of a document entitled ‘‘Guidance for Industry: Requalification Method for Reentry of Blood Donors
Deferred Because of Reactive Test Results for Antibody to Hepatitis B Core Antigen (Anti-HBc),’’ dated May 2010. The guidance document provides recommendations to establishments that collect Whole Blood or blood components intended for transfusion, with recommendations for a requalification method or process for reentering deferred donors into the donor pool based on a determination that previous tests that were repeatedly reactive for antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) were falsely positive and that there is no evidence of infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV). These recommendations are based on the recent availability of FDA-licensed hepatitis B virus nucleic acid tests (HBV NAT) that are particularly sensitive when single samples are tested. These tests provide an additional, powerful method of determining  whether a donor who has been deferred because of anti- HBc reactivity is truly infected by HBV. The guidance announced in this notice finalizes the draft guidance of the  same title dated May 2008.

Click Here for – Biotechnology Development Services – Click Here

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-05-23

  • The smallest detail of your development plan needs to support any orphan indication claims! #
  • The best way to understand a process is to go through it, be that orphan, pediatric or herbal registration! #

Powered by Twitter Tools

Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Guidance for Public, FDA Advisory Committee Members and FDA Staff, on Public Availability of Advisory Committee Members Financial Interest Information and Waivers

Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Guidance for Public, FDA Advisory Committee Members and FDA Staff, on Public Availability of Advisory Committee Members Financial Interest Information and Waivers.

Full Text Here

This guidance is intended to help the public, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee members, and FDA staff to understand and implement statutory requirements and FDA policy regarding public availability of information about financial interests and waivers granted by FDA to permit individuals to participate in advisory committee meetings subject to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (5 U.S.C. App. 2). This guidance describes the basis and provides a format for public disclosure of certain financial interests by special Government employees (SGEs) and regular Government employees participating in these advisory committee meetings, and provides a format for FDA waivers allowing participation in these meetings. This guidance also explains how and when these documents will be made publicly available by FDA.
FDA’s guidance documents, including this guidance, do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the Agency’s current thinking on a topic and should be viewed only as recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are cited. The use of the word should in Agency guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but not required.

Click Here for – Drug Development Services - Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Guidance for Public, FDA Advisory Committee Members and FDA Staff, on Public Availability of Advisory Committee Members Financial Interest Information and Waivers

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Guidance for Public, FDA Advisory Committee Members and FDA Staff, on Public Availability of Advisory Committee Members Financial Interest Information and Waivers

Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Draft Guidance for Industy and FDA Staff, on User Fees for 513(g) Requests for Clasification Information

Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, on User Fees for 513(g) Requests for Classification Information

Full Text Here

Title II of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA), also termed the Medical Device User Fee Amendments of 2007, P.L. 110-85, extends FDA’s
authority to collect medical device user fees by establishing a fee for “a request for classification information.” A “request for classification information” is “a request made
under section 513(g) for information respecting the class in which a device has been classified or the requirements applicable to a device.” This guidance and other FDA
publications use the term “513(g) request” and “Request for Information” as a synonym for this term. FDA’s response to a 513(g) request will provide information regarding
device classification and/or applicable regulatory requirements. The additional funds obtained from user fees will enable FDA to improve the device review process in order to meet performance goals identified in letters from the Secretary of Health and Human Services to Congress. The purpose of this guidance is to assist FDA staff and regulated industry by describing the user fees associated with 513(g) requests.

Click Here for – Device Development and Regulatory Services – Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Draft Guidance for Industy and FDA Staff, on User Fees for 513(g) Requests for Clasification Information

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, FDA, Publish Draft Guidance for Industy and FDA Staff, on User Fees for 513(g) Requests for Clasification Information

Drug Regulators, FDA, Publishes Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA staff, on Procedures for Section 513(g) Requests for Information Under The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.

Drug Regulators, FDA, Publishes Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA staff, on Procedures for Section 513(g) Requests for Information Under The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.

Full Text Here

The purpose of this guidance is to establish procedures for submitting, reviewing and responding to requests for information respecting the class in which a device has been classified or the requirements applicable to a device under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that are submitted in accordance with section 513(g) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. 360c(g).

Section 513(a) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(a)) establishes three classes of devices based on the regulatory controls needed to provide reasonable assurance of their safety and effectiveness: class I (general controls), class II (special controls), and class III (premarket approval). Under section 513(f) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)), post-amendments devices (devices that were not in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, the date the Medical Device Amendments were enacted) are classified in Class III. However, FDA may reclassify a post-amendments device (as Class I or II) or determine that such a device is “substantially equivalent” (SE)1 to either another post-amendments device that has been classified into Class I or II or to a preamendments device for which premarket approval is not required. Thus, a post-amendments device may be subject to regulation as a Class I or II device in certain circumstances, including when:
• the device is within a type of device that has been classified into class I or II and FDA has found the device to be SE to a device within such type;
• the device is within a type of pre-amendments device which is to be classified under section 513(b) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(b)) and FDA has found the device to be SE to a device within such type (an unclassified device type); or
• FDA has classified or reclassified the device type in class I or II in accordance with sections 513(f)(2) or 513(f)(3) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(2), (3)).

Pursuant to section 513(d) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(d)), FDA promulgates classification regulations classifying devices by generic type. A “generic type of device” is “a grouping of devices that do not differ significantly in purpose, design, materials, energy source, function, or any other feature related to safety and effectiveness, and for which similar regulatory controls are sufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness.” 21 CFR 860.3(i). FDA has issued regulations classifying the vast majority of pre-amendments devices (devices that were in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976) by generic type of device. See 21 CFR 860.84. Each classification regulation, located at 21 CFR parts 862-892, indicates in which class (I, II, or III) FDA has classified the device type. While the great majority of device classifications codified in 21 CFR parts 862-892 are of pre-amendments devices, some of these classifications are of post-amendments devices.

Click Here for – Devices Development Services – Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

<h1>Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!</h1>

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between <em>20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month</em>, and summaries them in a fantastic <strong>FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up</strong>. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. <em>Just fill in the form below</em>.

<form action=”http://www.damienbove.com/cgi-bin/arp3/arp3-formcapture.pl” method=”POST”>

<div>

First name

<input name=”first_name” size=”20″ type=”text” /></div>

<div>

Phone #1

<input name=”phone1″ size=”20″ type=”text” /></div>

<div>

E-mail address

<input name=”email” size=”20″ type=”text” /></div>

<input name=”subscription_type” type=”hidden” value=”E” />

<div><input type=”submit” value=”Yes Please, Sign Me Up!” /></div>

<input name=”id” type=”hidden” value=”7″ />

<a href=”http://www.damienbove.com/free-strategic-review/”><img class=”size-full wp-image-191″ title=”Free Strategy Consultation – Biotech Pharma Regualtory” src=”http://www.damienbove.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/ida_consultants_freestrategyconsultation_515x64.jpg” alt=”" width=”515″ height=”64″ /></a>

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

<input name=”extra_ar” type=”hidden” value=”|2″ /> </form><em>“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”</em>

<em><a href=”http://www.damienbove.com/how-to-write-a-business-plan/”><img class=”aligncenter size-full wp-image-640″ title=”How To Write A Business Plan” src=”http://www.damienbove.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ida_100programme_515x64_LowRes.jpg” alt=”" width=”515″ height=”64″ /></a>

</em>

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, FDA, Publishes Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA staff, on Procedures for Section 513(g) Requests for Information Under The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, FDA, Publishes Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA staff, on Procedures for Section 513(g) Requests for Information Under The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.

Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Updated Guideline on declaration of herbal substances and herbal preparations in herbal medicinal products/ traditional herbal medicinal products

Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Updated Guideline on declaration of herbal substances and herbal preparations in herbal medicinal products/ traditional herbal medicinal products.

Full Text Here

The guideline EMEA/HMPC/CHMP/CVMP/287539/2005 was limited to guidance on the declaration in the SmPC. It was revised to integrate the declaration in package leaflet and labelling. The revision is in line with the “Concept paper on the declaration of herbal substances/herbal preparations in finished herbal medicinal products” (EMEA/HMPC/241953/2005). The main chapters that have been revised are the following:

Executive summary: Declaration in the package leaflet and labelling has been introduced, besides declaration in the SmPC

Definitions: Definitions for the terms “declaration” and “strength” have been added

Annex 1: This new annex has been added to the guideline, providing guidance specifically on declaration in the package leaflet and labelling.

There are only editorial changes in the guidance on declaration in the SmPC (chapter 5 and 6).

The guideline EMEA/HMPC/CHMP/CVMP/287539/2005 was limited to guidance on the declaration in the SmPC. It was revised to integrate the declaration in package  leaflet and labelling. The revision is in line with the “Concept paper on the declaration of herbal substances/herbal preparations in finished herbal medicinal products” (EMEA/HMPC/241953/2005). This revised guideline outlines the principles for uniform declaration of herbal substances/preparations in herbal medicinal products as well as in traditional herbal medicinal products. It focuses on the different types of herbal substances/preparations in relation to the quality documentation given. Examples of declaration of such active substances are provided. The main guideline describes declaration in the SmPC. Guidance on package leaflets, labelling and other herbal specific provisions, for SmPC, package leaflets and labelling, have been added in Annex 1. The guideline should be read in conjunction with current EU/(V)ICH guidelines.

Common criteria for the declaration shall ensure clear differentiation between different types of herbal substances/preparations and proper description of their qualitative and quantitative particulars. As a result, a precise and consistent description of active substances of herbal medicinal products will be guaranteed within the Community.
The complex composition of herbal substances/preparations, which is essentially determined by various factors like the production process, the extraction solvent, the genuine drug extract ratio (DER genuine), and the type/physical state of the herbal substances/preparations, needs to be stated to guarantee identification and facilitate comparison of herbal substances/preparations. However, it is not feasible to provide full characterisation in the declaration as the declaration should be kept as short
and precise as possible. The declaration is primarily intended to describe the identity and quantity of the herbal substance/preparation, being the active substance of the herbal medicinal product and should focus on those characteristics found to be useful in ensuring the safety and efficacy of the herbal substance/preparation and herbal medicinal product. Therefore, a declaration system has been established which reflects the main characteristics of herbal substances/preparations as defined in the respective specifications. For this purpose, general guidance as given in the European Pharmacopeoia (particularly the monographs “Extracts”, “Herbal Drugs”,
“Herbal Drug Preparations”, and “Herbal Teas”) as well as in the guidelines listed under References, should be followed.

Click Here for – Herbal Development Services - Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Updated Guideline on declaration of herbal substances and herbal preparations in herbal medicinal products/ traditional herbal medicinal products

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, EMA (EMEA), Publish Updated Guideline on declaration of herbal substances and herbal preparations in herbal medicinal products/ traditional herbal medicinal products

Drug Regulator, EMA (EMEA), Publish Comments Received on Guideline on Declaration of Herbal Substances and Herbal Preparations in Herbal Medicinal Products / Traditional Herbal Products.

Drug Regulator, EMA (EMEA), Publish Comments Received on Guideline on Declaration of Herbal Substances and Herbal Preparations in Herbal Medicinal Products / Traditional Herbal Products.

Full Text Here

Interested party Comment and Rationale Outcome

AESGP We take the benefit of this revision to communicate some minor comments on specific items which are not correct from our point of view or which should be clarified.

Click Here for – Herbal Development Services - Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulator, EMA (EMEA), Publish Comments Received on Guideline on Declaration of Herbal Substances and Herbal Preparations in Herbal Medicinal Products / Traditional Herbal Products.

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulator, EMA (EMEA), Publish Comments Received on Guideline on Declaration of Herbal Substances and Herbal Preparations in Herbal Medicinal Products / Traditional Herbal Products.

Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Concept Paper on the Need for Guideline on the Use of Subgroup Analysis in Randomised Controlled Trials

Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Concept Paper on the Need for Guideline on the Use of Subgroup Analysis in Randomised Controlled Trials.

Full Text Here

Analysis of subgroups is important in every confirmatory trial. Subgroup analyses are used for assessment of internal consistency, to try to rescue trials that ‘fail’ based on the full analysis set or to try to identify patient groups with the most favourable benefit-risk profile. Subgroups may be prespecified in the trial protocol, based on demographic, genomic or disease characteristics (e.g. subentities of a disease that are widely recognised within the medical community) or may materialise based on a need or desire to further explore study results. Formal statistical methods for investigating the homogeneity of the treatment effect across subgroups do exist and these are  sometimes used by companies or regulatory bodies to provide re-assurance or to challenge the applicability of overall findings to subgroups. In addition, simpler (often visual) methods can be helpful in elucidating and displaying results from subgroups. In some dossiers, the investigation of results in subgroups is minimal, perhaps in fear of (possibly false) negative findings that may complicate assessment. There is no specific CHMP guidance document on assessment of subgroup analyses. It is proposed that some important methodological considerations and assessment strategies are set out in a guidance document and some example datasets discussed.

The document will include a general discussion on the importance of subgroup analyses in randomized clinical trials. It will describe why estimated treatment effects in subgroups can be unreliable and will summarise methods available, and their limitations, for the investigation and presentation of homogeneity of estimated treatment effects. A number of specific scenarios will be described:

i) Assessment of ‘internal consistency’: the uniformity or otherwise of treatment effects across a range of patients recruited into clinical trials and hence the applicability of the overall finding to subgroups. Whilst many important subgroups will be therapeutic indication specific, groups that should routinely be inspected will be identified. The role of pre-specification, replication of evidence and ‘biological plausibility’ in the assessment of internal consistency will be discussed. Some example ‘Forest’ plots and strategies for assessment will be presented and the difference between qualitative and quantitative interactions explained. The paper will discuss situations where sample size considerations for clinical trial planning should consider not only the full analysis set, but also the number of patients recruited to and the duration of follow-up for subgroups that are a priori known to be of relevance and, consequently, where assessment of internal consistency will be critical to the regulatory decision.
ii) Negative conclusions from subgroups: In trials from which a positive conclusion can be drawn based on the pre-specified analyses, concern may still arise from the  assessment of internal consistency over results in one or more specific subgroups and in certain instances a restriction to the indicated patient population may be discussed.
iii) Positive conclusions from subgroup analyses: A common mis-use of subgroup analysis is to rescue a trial which, formally fails based on the pre-specified primary analysis in the full analysis set. Concerns with this strategy and factors which determine the limited scenarios where exceptions might be made will be explained. Subgroup analyses are also used in positive trials to identify groups where benefit-risk is improved compared to the full analysis set, in particular where benefit is estimated to be higher, or to make additional label claims in addition to those made on the full analysis set. For these latter two scenarios, issues relating to multiplicity adjustment for identifying subgroups, stratification, pre-specification, replication of evidence, ‘biological plausibility’ and reliability of estimated treatment effects will be discussed.
iv) Some trials will be initiated with the option of basing conclusions on either the full analysis set or on a pre-defined subgroup. Specific issues with this strategy will be considered in the framework of adaptive designs for e.g. pharmacogenomic biomarkers.

Click Here For – Drug Development Planning and Reg Strategy Services – Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Concept Paper on the Need for Guideline on the Use of Subgroup Analysis in Randomised Controlled Trials

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Concept Paper on the Need for Guideline on the Use of Subgroup Analysis in Randomised Controlled Trials

Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Concept Paper on the Need for Revision of the Notes for Guidance on Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the Treatment of Schizophrenia (CPMP/EWP/559/95)

Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Concept Paper on the Need for Revision of the Notes for Guidance on Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the Treatment of Schizophrenia (CPMP/EWP/559/95).

Full Text Here

Since the publication of the guideline for schizophrenia in 1998 and its appendix related to the depot preparations in 2001, scientific progress has been made towards identification of specific functional domains that may be potential targets for treatment beyond the traditional treatment of psychosis, i.e. positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Furthermore, additional efforts have been made to optimize treatment through new treatment strategies and algorithms, and therefore target populations, in order to further reduce symptoms that remain present after conventional treatment. Whether such treatment strategies refer to all patients or to a restricted population, needs to be discussed. In addition to the psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia, cognitive impairment is recognised as a domain in schizophrenia related to central cholinergic activity. The ability of atypical antipsychotics such as clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone or ziprasidone to improve some of the aspects of cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia may be attributed to increased acetylcholine release in the medial prefrontal cortex. The legislation with regard to the need and encouragement of the  development of medication for children has brought the scientific community to re-evaluate the presence of psychosis and psychotic symptoms in the age group below 18 years of age.
Together with the prospect of the revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV), e.g. possible changes in categorical approaches and introduction of new categories, several additions and changes in this guideline are needed to review and express the current state of scientific knowledge.

The current guideline is not entirely up to date and should cover the latest scientific developments with regard to the options of targeting new functional domains, of using new treatment strategies, and defining what kind of data are needed in children and adolescents. Consequently, it will be discussed if the appendix on depot formulations is in line with the revised note for guidance.

Click Here for – Drug Development and Regulatory Strategy Services – Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Concept Paper on the Need for Revision of the Notes for Guidance on Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the Treatment of Schizophrenia (CPMP/EWP/559/95)

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Concept Paper on the Need for Revision of the Notes for Guidance on Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the Treatment of Schizophrenia (CPMP/EWP/559/95)

Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Overview of Comments Received on “Guideline on the Clinical Evaluation of Antifungal Agents for the Treatment and Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Disease”

Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Overview of Comments Received on “Guideline on the Clinical Evaluation of Antifungal Agents for the Treatment and Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Disease”

Full Text Here

Interested parties (organisations or individuals) that commented on the draft document as released for consultation.
1 EFPIA

EFPIA welcomes the revision of the existing guideline on the clinical evaluation of antifungal agents for the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal disease. EFPIA wishes to raise the following key comments, regarding some of the concepts presented in the draft guideline. These key points are followed by other important comments presented according to the different sections of the draft guideline.

Click Here for – Drug Development Services – Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Overview of Comments Received on Guideline on the Clinical Evaluation of Antifungal Agents for the Treatment and Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Disease

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Overview of Comments Received on Guideline on the Clinical Evaluation of Antifungal Agents for the Treatment and Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Disease

Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Concept Paper on the Need for Revision of the Guideline on the Clinical Development of Medicinal Products for the Treatment of Hepatitis C

Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Concept Paper on the Need for Revision of the Guideline on the Clinical Development of Medicinal Products for the Treatment of Hepatitis C.

Full Text Here

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a leading cause of chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as the most common indication for liver transplantation in many European countries. Worldwide, the number of chronically infected persons is estimated at 170 million, or 3% of the global population. About 20-30% of chronically infected persons will advance to cirrhosis within 20 years. In Europe around 1/3 of HIV-infected patients are co-infected with HCV, with a prevalence of 50% in some regions in southern Europe. Compared to HCV mono-infected patients, these patients have faster progression of liver fibrosis; the risk for manifest cirrhosis is doubled for a middle-aged man carrying both infections. The present standard of care (SOC) treatment for hepatitis C is a combination of ribavirin and pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alpha 2a or 2b. Whereas PEG-IFN is an immunomodulator, the mechanism of action of ribavirin is not precisely understood. The field of hepatitis C therapy, however,
is presently one of intense investigational activity, with numerous directly acting antiviral (DAA) compounds with different mechanisms of action presently undergoing phase I-III trials. The first marketing applications for such agents are foreseen in 2010.

The first CHMP guidelines on the “Clinical Evaluation of Direct Acting Antiviral Agents Intended for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C” (CHMP/EWP/30039/08) were published in May 2009. Due to the limited experience with other approaches to the clinical development of DAAs, this guideline primarily addresses studies in which new DAAs are added to SOC treatment for chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The discussion of other therapeutic approaches, such as the combination of DAAs with or without SOC
components, is rather rudimentary, as is the issue of labelling requirements in special populations. Indeed, in the extant guideline it is recognised that “due to the dynamics of the field and the restricted scope of this guideline, revisions and amendments are foreseen to be necessary within a short frame of time”. Particular issues for new or updated guidance would include:
• Study design, dose selection and populations when evaluating DAA combinations without SOC or PEG-IFN.
• Study design and endpoints in patients with decompensated liver disease.
• Studies pre- and post transplant.
• Requirements for licensure in genotypes with a low prevalence in the developed world.
• Updated guidance on DAA resistance.
• Study design and populations for confirmatory trials in HCV/HIV co-infected patients.
• Benchmark pharmacodynamics, viral load and resistance assays.
• The use of non-invasive methods for liver assessment.
• The study of DAAs in DAA-experienced patients.
• The use of genetic predictors of SOC activity for DAA study design.
• Studies in children.

Click Here for – Drug Development Services – Click Here for

http://www.damienbove.com/drug-development-and-planning-services/

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Concept Paper on the Need for Revision of the Guideline on the Clinical Development of Medicinal Products for the Treatment of Hepatitis C

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulators, EMA, Publish Concept Paper on the Need for Revision of the Guideline on the Clinical Development of Medicinal Products for the Treatment of Hepatitis C

Drug Regulator, EMA, Publishes Concept Paper on the Need for Revision of the Note for Guidance on the Clinical Investigation for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence. (CPMP/EWP/19/01)

Drug Regulator, EMA, Publishes Concept Paper on the Need for Revision of the Note for Guidance on the Clinical Investigation for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence. (CPMP/EWP/19/01)

Full Text Here

There is a need for revision of the current guideline ‘Note for Guidance on the Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence’ as justified below.

There is a need to clarify the registration requirements for the ICS term “Overactive bladder” (OAB), which has been subject to the therapeutic indications of recently approved medicinal products for urinary incontinence. It is noted that this term was not used in the current guideline; hence, a more in depth discussion of the registration requirements for this claim seems appropriate. In addition, several products for use in children with OAB are being developed. Therefore, the paediatric needs should be reflected in the revised guideline. Other recent developments concerned the specific field of stress incontinence, which needs to be reflected in the revised guideline. There is also an interest to develop tissue engineering products for the treatment of urinary incontinence. Finally, there is a need to expand on the specific aspects related to male incontinence in the guideline.

Click Here – Drug Development Services – Click Here

Damien Bové is THE Drug Development and Regulatory Consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology), I work with my clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Avoid Expensive Mistakes, Keep On Top of New and Changing Regulations for Free!

Sign up for the most value add free newsource you can get for free. We spend a huge amount of time and effort monitoring the main drug / device regulators websites for changes in the regulatory environment, and capture between 20 and 40 new regulations, rules and initiatives each month, and summaries them in a fantastic FREE monthly Regulatory and Market Round Up. You can Un-Subscribe at any time and we don not share your details with anybody. You can’t afford to miss out on this service. Just fill in the form below.

First name

Phone #1

E-mail address

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Regulator, EMA, Publishes Concept Paper on the Need for Revision of the Note for Guidance on the Clinical Investigation for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence. (CPMP/EWP/19/01)

Free Strategy Consultation - Biotech Pharma Regualtory

“Please note that the pages on this website are designed to provide you with general information only. We make no warranties, representations or undertakings about any of its content. This includes the completeness, accuracy and fitness for any particular purpose, or the content of any third party site referred to or accessed through it. You are personally responsible for ensuring that the information is correct and we will not be held liable or accountable for any mistakes that occur.”

ida 100programme 515x64 LowRes Drug Regulator, EMA, Publishes Concept Paper on the Need for Revision of the Note for Guidance on the Clinical Investigation for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence. (CPMP/EWP/19/01)