Monthly Archives: June 2009

Apple Puts Onus of FDA Clearance on iPhone Developers

I have just been reading an interesting little aside on Mobihealthnews I thought I would share with you. As more and more developers are make applications (apps) for the Apple iPhone, using at as in interface for medical devices is an obvious solution and one that make allot of commercial sense. However it raises a number of issues that the FDA are currently struggling with. Any medical device needs to be approved by the FDA, and in the context of a medical device app, the iPhone becomes a medical device. However Apple have not sought FDA approval, and I would suspect are unlikely to do so, so are they in violation? its a tough call. Apple have put in a clause in their contract with application developers that the developer seeks all regulatory approvals etc, in their eyes passing the buck to the developers, however its not clear if that is acceptable to the FDA, you can’t usually contract away responsibility for medical compliance, watch this space for more on this interesting topic.

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Apple Puts Onus of FDA Clearance on iPhone Developers

Grow your Expertise for Free

As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

This guideline ap
recombinant vaccines for the prevention and treatment of infectious disease, and provides guidance on quality, non-clinical and clinical aspects.

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2009-06-28

  • Drug development planning is a clear process starting at your desired goal and working back from there! #
  • The access to finance programme running in Yorkshire is looking out for participants! Get investor ready! #
  • My website is now ranked top 3 on google! Which is nice! Google has recognised the huge amount of high quality content! #
  • USA Pharmaceutical companies agreed to give discounts to medicare patients, when insurance cover stops and they start paying! $80bn worth #
  • Before approaching investors make sure you know their strategy and targets that way you can focus your approach! #
  • 90% of any planning process is spent reading and soaking it all up! And 5% thinking and 5% typing! #

Powered by Twitter Tools.

Drug Patent Settlements Cost Consumers US$3.5bn annualy in the USA

I have just read an interesting article on www.firstwordpluss.com that was looking at the deals branded drug manufactures reach with generic providers when they settle Patent disputes, and how these deal prevent generic competition and keep drug prices high. The US Federal Trade Commission is looking a ways to ban such activities. For my money this will create two things 1) an increase in competition, 2) an increase in long and costly court cases. Its an interesting development that could have wide ranging impact, the whole drug market in the USA is undergoing some seismic shifts and this is just another example. two recent article in this blog have been pointing at it “drugmakers reach deal” and “unprecidented barriers to evolution“.

This is the interesting element of the article ” An analysis by the US Federal Trade Commission indicated that a ban on patent settlements between brand and generic drug-makers would reduce spending on prescription drugs by $3.5 billion each year. The elimination of these deals, in which drug manufacturers pay potential competitors to delay the launch of generic products, would serve “as a way to control prescription drug costs, restore the benefits of generic competition, and help pay for healthcare reform,” the FTC stated on Tuesday…..the study results demonstrated that settlements involving payments to generic drug-makers added 17 months on average to the time a generic product took to reach market, compared to cases where there were negotiations about timing but no payments.”

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drug Patent Settlements Cost Consumers US$3.5bn annualy in the USA

Grow your Expertise for Free

As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

This guideline ap
recombinant vaccines for the prevention and treatment of infectious disease, and provides guidance on quality, non-clinical and clinical aspects.

Non GMP stock allowable for Human Radiolabled PK studies

I have just received an interesting letter from Charles Rivers Edinburgh and there are a few interesting points I wanted to share with you.

“Since 2004, there has been a clear requirement to manufacture the IP (drug product) to Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP), however the quality standard required for the radiolabeled Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) was open to interpretation. Following the implementation of GMP Annex 20 on Quality Risk Management in March 2008, and with the amendment to GMP Part II (Basic Requirements for APIs used as Starting Materials) in draft, a risk management approach to the assessment of the quality of the API has been adopted”

So if you wish to use radiolabeled products for human PK it does not necessary need to be GMP stock, this is a great and important point and can be truly valuable to companies planning risk management microdosing studies, but it does need to be assessed for potential risks. its an important point that needs considering.

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Non GMP stock allowable for Human Radiolabled PK studies

Grow your Expertise for Free

As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

This guideline ap
recombinant vaccines for the prevention and treatment of infectious disease, and provides guidance on quality, non-clinical and clinical aspects.

Drugmakers reach deal to reduce US Medicare coverage gap

I have just read an interesting article on www.firstwordpluss.com that I wanted to share with you.

“The pharmaceutical industry agreed to a proposal to provide drug discounts to US Medicare beneficiaries that could be worth up to $80 billion over the next ten years. The proposal, which is part of a health-care bill drafted by US lawmakers on June 19, aims to reduce the coverage gap that affects recipients once their drug costs reach a certain level”

Its part of the sign that the USA is moving away from being the golden goose drug market that many have known for years and is moving to a more European model for health markets, this was inevitable and matches some of the predictions previously published on this site (see here). Its inevitable that as health care budgets become a larger part of national spending this kind of trend is only going to become more apparent.

More on the article

“As part of the deal that was negotiated between PhRMA and lawmakers, drugmakers would “provide a 50-percent discount to most beneficiaries on brand-name medicines covered by a patient’s Part D plan when purchased in the coverage gap,” according to industry representatives. In addition, the entire cost of the medicine purchased in the coverage gap will count towards the Medicare recipient’s out-of-pocket expenses.”

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Drugmakers reach deal to reduce US Medicare coverage gap

Grow your Expertise for Free

As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

This guideline ap
recombinant vaccines for the prevention and treatment of infectious disease, and provides guidance on quality, non-clinical and clinical aspects.

MHRA guidance on the vigilance systems for medical devices- Intraocular lenses

This guidance document gives advice to manufacturers on the notification of adverse incidents involving intra-ocular lenses under medical devices vigilance system. It includes, but is not limited to, the following types of intraocular lenses: posterior chamber; phakic; anterior chamber; multifocal; and accommodated. It is intended to facilitate uniform application implementation of the medical devices directive.

The kinds of things should be reported include:

  • Any deterioration or malfunction of an intraocular lens or any inadequacy in instructions for use which has led, on might lead to, a serious deterioration in the state of health and vision.
  • The intraocular lens has been subject to a field safety corrective action
  • Common faults that require reporting are also listed

The guidance also goes on to give some details about Periodic Summary Reporting and Adverse Incident Trending, its a short guidance but should be look at and considered by those working in the area.

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 MHRA guidance on the vigilance systems for medical devices  Intraocular lenses

Grow your Expertise for Free

As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

This guideline ap
recombinant vaccines for the prevention and treatment of infectious disease, and provides guidance on quality, non-clinical and clinical aspects.

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2009-06-21

  • Putting course materials together for the 100% programme! 100% funding! 100% of the time! #
  • Giving something back is a pleasure and an obligation Sign up for the science and technology ambassador programme Inspire the next gen! #
  • Framework 7 is looking like a great opportunity for fund raising especially the ideas fund. I personaly am going to be pitching for a client #
  • A 20 page version of any business plan is essential if it is to remain readable! Get right down to basics! #
  • The 100% programme is realy coming together now! Its going to be opening soon, get ready to share in our success! #

Powered by Twitter Tools.

Guidline on Quality, Non-Clinical and Clinical Aspects of Live Recombinant Viral Vectored Vaccines

EMEA publishes new guidelines, “Guideline on Quality, Non-Clinical and Clinical Aspects of Live Recombinant Viral Vectored Vaccines” . Vaccines against infectious diseases based on a viral vector expressing the antigen infectious agent have been under development for some time.This guideline ap pplies to such live recombinant vaccines for the prevention and treatment of infectious disease, and provides guidance on quality, non-clinical and clinical aspects.

The objective of this guideline is to provide recommendations on the quality, nonclinical and clinical studies should be performed in order to obtain marketing authorisation of a live recombinant viral vector vaccine intended to use in the prophylaxis of infectious disease in humans. This guideline is intended products entering the marketing authorisation procedure. However, the principles laid down in this guideline should be considered by applicants entering into clinical trials.

In this guideline, the emphasis is placed upon safety issues, such as:

  • The phenotype of recombinant virus
  • The extent of pre-immunity to the vector, the extent of community induced to the vector and the potential for reuse of the vector,
  • Genetic stability of the recombinant virus, reversion to the virulence or the combination with wild type strains
  • Clinical follow up in healthy patient populations
  • Chromosomal germline integration.

These aspects will drive the selection a number of different relevant toxicological pharmacological models. Emphasis is also placed on first in man studies as the vaccines within the scope of this guideline and novel laboratory derived viruses obtained by recombinant DNA technology and clinical assessment will represent their first contact with humans.

The guideline goes on to give detailed descriptions of what is expected in the following areas:

  • Quality aspects
    • General considerations
    • Genetic development
    • Vaccine seed lots
      • General
      • Characterisation of vaccine seed lots
      • Adventitious agent safety
    • Vaccine manufacture
      • Vaccine production
      • Harvesting
      • Virus pools
      • Final bulk vaccine (drug substance)
    • Control of final vaccine (drug product)
      • Identity
      • Potency assays
      • Stability
      • Consistency of production
  • Nonclinical immunological and safety requirements
    • General considerations
    • Pharmacodynamic studies (protection and immunogenicity)
    • Nonclinical safety studies (toxicity testing)
      • Single and repeated dose toxicity
      • Distribution studies
      • Reproduction and development toxicity studies
      • Local tolerance
  • Clinical
    • Immunogenicity
    • Safety

These are a detailed set of guidelines that cover most of the process of development and are required reading for anybody working in the area.

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug  development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Guidline on Quality, Non Clinical and Clinical Aspects of Live Recombinant Viral Vectored Vaccines

Grow your Expertise for Free

As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

This guideline ap
recombinant vaccines for the prevention and treatment of infectious disease, and provides guidance on quality, non-clinical and clinical aspects.

Guest Article – The Fight Against Influenza

The recent Swine Flu scare caused a hubbub among the health world in the past few months as many health officials and scientists scrambled to find a cure for this new pandemic disease that was sweeping the world. While many of these accounts were premature in terms of seriousness, many drug development companies worked long hours in order to discover some type of medication that could counteract this new form of flu. Tamiflu has proven to be effective in combating the regular type of influenza (H5N1) as well as active in the fight against the H1N1 Swine Flu virus.

Tamiflu was launched in Switzerland in 1999 and infiltrated the European market by 2002, slowly expanded to the rest of the world after that. The company Chugai Pharmaceuticals markets the drug, while Roche has a majority stake and has expanded its capacity in recent years in order to meet the growing demand for additional supplies. The World Health Organization has been adamant for years of an impending flu epidemic that will sweep the globe, which is one of the reasons the organization was quick to escalate the Swine Flu virus up to a pandemic level. While the virus never reached the “pandemic” levels that health officials originally thought, it did shake up the international sector of health and caused many around the world to get flu immunizations and purchase masks to “guard” themselves against the passing virus. Tamiflu has been proven to reduce the duration of the influenza illness as well as reduce the severity of the symptoms and later infections that could occur such as bronchitis.

New flu viruses are discovered every year in different places around the world, which is why the WHO is so adamant on finding antibiotics that will counteract the virus so there are as few deaths as possible. However, the H1N1 virus was unique in that it did not affect the typical demographic of flu patients (the very old and very young), but attacked many healthy individuals in their 20s and 30s. While the number of Swine Flu deaths has remained constant at 119 around the world, the WHO is still considering raising the level to the highest of a pandemic in order to up the efforts to combat the disease in order to curb the deaths that could occur. Influenza in general is blamed for many more deaths per year, especially pinpointing the elderly and the very young; the scare with Swine Flu is that it has affected so many people in the median age range who typically remain healthy throughout flu season. The flu is not typically seen as an overarching disease which many people succumb to throughout the year, but the WHO and the media have helped paint this specific flu as such and have therefore increased efforts to develop new vaccines and drugs that can combat the virus and nip it in the bud.

This post was contributed by Meredith Walker, who writes about the online nursing schools. She welcomes your feedback at MeredithWalker1983 at gmail.com

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug  development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Guest Article   The Fight Against Influenza

Grow your Expertise for Free

As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

Customer Testemonial

“We valued the input from IDA consultants, their commercial and scientific mix was especially helpful with the planning process”

Dr Suzanne Emmett - YTKO

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2009-06-14

  • When dealing with the PDCO, its important to have a clear strategy and a good handle on your data! Especially if your going in early! #
  • New proof of concept funds in Yorkshire, more details to follow on the news site tomorrow! #
  • The drug regulations change constantly, what do you do to keep up to date? sign up to our free updates programme http://www.idaconsultants.com #
  • When planning experiments, try and think what is being proved by the experiment, is their an alternative that has lower barriers? #
  • Investors need some information if they are going to open discussions with you, get it ready before hand! #

Powered by Twitter Tools.

FDA guidance – Q8(R1) Pharamceutical Development – submission contents and overall pharmaceutical development guidance.

The FDA has produced a revised version of the Q8 pharmaceutical development guidance. This guidance is a revision of the ICH Q8 pharmaceutical development guidelines were published in May 2006.the Q8 guidance describes the suggested contents for the 3.2 .P .2 (pharmaceutical development) section of the regulatory submission in the ICH M4 common technical document (CTD) format.

The pharmaceutical development section provides an opportunity present the knowledge gained with application of scientific approaches and quality and risk management of  the development of a product and its manufacturing process. This documentation is first produced for the original marketing application and can be updated to support new knowledge gained of the life-cycle of a product. the pharmaceutical development section is intended to provide a comprehensive understanding of the product and manufacturing process for reviews and inspectors. The guidance also indicate areas where the demonstration of greater understanding the pharmaceutical Manufacturing sciences can create a basis for flexible regulatory approaches. The degree of regulatory flexibility is predicted on level relevant scientific knowledge provided.

This guidance does not apply to contents of submissions of the drug product during the clinical research stages of drug development. However, the principles in this guidance are important to consider during all stages as well. This guidance might also be appropriate for the types of products.

The guidance goes through each of the sections in turn and describes the relevant content the regulators expect to see in that section:

  • II a pharmaceutical development (2)
    • A. Component of the drug product (2.1)
      • 1. Drug substance (2.1.1)
      • 2. Excipients (2.1.2)
    • B. Drug product (2.2)
      • 1. Formulation development (2.2.1)
      • 2. Overages (2.2.2)
      • 3. Physicochemical and biological properties (2.2.3)
    • C. Manufacturing process development (2.3)
    • D. Container closure system (2.4)
    • E. Microbiological attributes (2.5)
    • F. Compatibility (2.6)

The guidance is so specific as to render any summary redundant readers are directed to download the entire document by clicking this link.

The bulk of changes to the document and incorporated in an annexe at the back of the guidance, this annex provides further clarification of key concepts outlined in Q8 pharmaceutical development. In addition, this annex describes the principles of quality by design. The annex is not intended to establish new standards or to introduce new regulatory requirements; however, it shows how concepts and tools outlined in the Q8 parent guidance could be put into practice by the applicant for all dosage forms.

this annex suggests strategic and quality systems that a company can adopt at the very start of the drug discovery programme, it describes approaches to pharmaceutical development, that the FDA and the International commission on harmonisation (ICH) would recommend for any company developing a pharmaceutical product with a significant commitment to quality. The guidance goes on to describe a number of elements that should be included at a minimum:

  • quality target product profile (QTPP)
  • critical quality attribute (CQAs)
  • determination of critical quality attributes
  • selection of appropriate manufacturing process
  • risk assessment
  • and definition of equality strategy

Each of these strategies in elements and described in some detail, the FDA go to great pains to point out that this is not a regulatory framework, better recommended system that they believe will ensure increased quality. I believe this documentation to be of such critical nature is to be recommended reading for anybody working in the area of drug development of discovery.

Please expect a more detailed review to this document to be published on this site.

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug  development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 FDA guidance   Q8(R1) Pharamceutical Development   submission contents and overall pharmaceutical development guidance.

Grow your Expertise for Free

As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

Technology Strategy Board – New Competitions

The Technology Strategy Board is charged with solving the problems facing local and national government departments. There is a specific programme called the SBRI that is of interest to our readers. The SBRI (small business research initiative) run competitions which private companies can pitch in for, those that are successful get full funding for the programme of work. As you can imagine the remit for this programme is wide and all encompassing. But having a look on the site has revealed a number of health care competitions currently ongoing or opening soon:

  • Keeping Children Active - An SBRI competition is being launched in the East of England to look for ways that technology could be used to improve how children stay fit and healthy. Children are taking less exercise than they used to and there are rising rates of obesity amongst young people – increasing by 45% over the last 10 years.
  • Managing Long Term Conditions - An SBRI competition is being launched in the East of England to find ways to help manage the growing numbers of people with long-term health conditions, such as diabetes, coronary heart disease, high blood pressure, etc. It is looking to industry to bring new technologies to support the achievement of regional health priorities and increase the possibility of adoption in the NHS.
  • Patient Safety and Long Term Outcomes - An SBRI competition is being launched in the East of England which aims to use new technologies to improve patient care and eradicate errors – with a focus on patient safety. Could technology provide the answer and ensure best practice is applied every time?

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug  development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Technology Strategy Board   New Competitions

Grow your Expertise for Free

As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

Correction on N8

In an post earlier today I said that the organisation N8 was a spin out from Yorkshire Forward, this was a misunderstanding on my part, I have corrected the mistake in the blog entry, but felt I should put a new post in about it to make sure your all up to date.

N8 is a partnership between the eight research-intensive universities in the North of England (Durham, Lancaster, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle, Sheffield and York) and as such has no links to RDAs, although much of their work aligns well with the Innovation theme of the Northern Way, which involves working with all three Northern RDAs, and we they have also been in receipt of Northern Way grant funding to set up the Research Centres including METRC).

Its a great model and I encourage you all to have a look at their website for more details. www.n8research.org.uk .

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug  development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 Correction on N8

Grow your Expertise for Free

As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

Regulatory Round Up

Grow your Expertise for Free

As you know this website is a great resource for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

First name

E-mail address

N8, METRC, and an Associated Proof of Concept Fund

I went to an event yesterday that was set up to introduce the industry to some new opportunities for accessing academic research expertise.  the event was organised by METRC, who are the N8 Molecular Engineering Translational Research Centre. The set up is based on industry taking their challenges and R&D requirements to the METRC team who then pull together the different academic groups across the Yorkshire region who have the expertise to address the requirements. The hope is that the process will start to tackle the perceived wall between academia and industry in a way that will bring economic benefits to all.

METRC was set up by  N8 a partnership between the eight research-intensive universities in the North of England (Durham, Lancaster, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle, Sheffield and York) , who have established a number of these kinds of groups tackling different areas of science.

The important bit for us is that at the moment there are some proof of concept grants available that can be attached to projects going through the system, these grants up to £50K are available to address overhead costs of the research, so bring the costs down. I will be looking into this for a few of my clients.

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug  development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 N8, METRC, and an Associated Proof of Concept Fund

Grow your Expertise for Free

As you know this website is a great resourse for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

IDA consultants Provides Regulatory Roadmap

IDA consultats has been approached to provide a couple of slides that outline a regulatory roadmap, I thought I woudl share them with my readers as well, along with the notes that I provided to the speaker, I hope you find them helpful.

slide1 IDA consultants Provides Regulatory Roadmap

slide2 IDA consultants Provides Regulatory Roadmap

The pathway through MHRA/EMEA drug approval process

Speaker notes for slides

The first step is to put together your development plan, in the first instance you will require clinical trials outlines nonclinical outlines nonclinical safety outlines and GMP manufacturing plans. It is advised that you seek scientific advice at this stage unless your program is very much a vanilla program. This process of gaining a regulatory rubberstamp can prove very valuable in terms of de-risking your project and make you more attractive to investors.

In order to get your clinical trial program approved there are two routes that you can take:

There is a central review process that is run by a subcommittee of the EMEA, where you can submit your development plan and clinical trials protocols for central review this is not an approval process, it enables European wide feedback and comments upon your plans. It is voluntary for most programs however it is mandatory for biotech products and high-tech products for multinational phase 3 programs . You still need to apply for local approval after this and local ethics approval however it gives you an opportunity to countries that have a positive opinion about your program.

Most companies chose to go down the national procedure route, in which you have your clinical trial approved by the appropriate authorities in the UK this is the MHRA, you will then require local ethics approval, we advise you apply for both your CTA and your local ethics simultaneously in order to save time.

If your product is a high risk product such as monoclonal or similar, you will require an extra stage of approval by the EAG this will come before your standard CTA approval program.

You can then initiate your clinical trials programme.

For the scientific meetings and advice you will need a regulatory briefing book, this should be ideally no more than 20 to 50 pages 20 pages of the new programs 50 pages the programs are gone through a number of clinical trials, this should be very brief and to the point.

To start your official CTA process you will require full protocols, full case report forms, and a much more detailed briefing book.

In order to undertake your clinical trial you will require a CRO to manage it, it is recommended that you undergo a CRO selection process at a very early stage, you will require insurance, again the cost of insurance can be much reduced if you speak to your insurance company at a very early stage. You will require ongoing Pharmacovigilance cover, in most of the world pre-clinical and clinical trials programmes will require GMP clinical trial stock however there are a number of countries were full GMP is not required and “in the spirit of GMP” may be acceptable. This includes the USA Belgium and Holland.

I would recommend that you seek regulatory scientific advice between each of your clinical trials in order to establish that the results seen have not impacted on the regulatory acceptance of the overall design. This is probably not required if your results are exactly as you have predicted they would be.

Second slide

Once you have completed your development programme will require a product licence to sell your product in Europe. There are many routes for this: there is a central process run by the EMEA, a national process, the national process followed by mutual recognition, and decentralised process for products that are already on the market in the country.

There are many factors that go into the choice of routes to many to be discussed here. Whichever route you decide upon it is well advised to seek meetings with the regulators well before submission of your application in order to confirm acceptance of your planned route.

With the central process your application is made to the EMEA who then have it reviewed by two representative national bodies, if this is acceptable then Central European approval is granted and your product can be sold anywhere within the union.

In the national process you gain national approval with the body of your choice then you can sell your product in that country. At this point you can start a mutual recognition process where you use your existing approval to springboard approval into other selected states.

The decentralised procedure is the products are being on the market and have a market history in one or more European states, you can then proceed to gain regulatory approval in national states based upon that national approval.

Whichever route you take your require a common technical document or a an eCTD as they are known, this will ensure that your documentation is in a state that is acceptable in all this national states and also in the USA.

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug  development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 IDA consultants Provides Regulatory Roadmap

As you know this website is a great resourse for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2009-06-07

  • I’m considering if med chem stand alone is sufficient for an NCE discovery programme? Probably not will need some QASR and modeling too! #
  • Preparing a company presentation for fund raising! We have 100% record, let’s keep it up #
  • MHRA publishes guidance on medical devices directives #
  • Writting an investor package, which again raises the need for detailed costs for drug discovery and develoment! Fortunately We have them! #
  • The important thing when talking about markets is not market sizes but market dynamics, and market gaps, especially in healthcare! #
  • CMC – the missing key, don’t forgett it in your early planning, you need GMP stock, unless your wise and go to USA, Holland or Belgium! #
  • The 100% programme, 100% of the information, making you 100% investor ready, and delivering investment 100% of the time! Comming soon! #
  • When writing a business plan or investor brochure don’t put all the data in the main body! Use a summary and an appendix! Readable Please. #

Powered by Twitter Tools.

New Manchester University Spin Out Fund

The University of Manchester has announced a new investment fund for commercialisation, the fund is called the Premier Opportunity Fund and is dedicated to the commercialisation of the University Spin Outs. The Fund is established to make between 15 and 20 investments of between £250,000 and £750,000, it will then make follow on investment of up to £3,000,000 should it be appropriate.  The Money and business support has come from MTI a technology Management Company.

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug  development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 New Manchester University Spin Out Fund

As you know this website is a great resourse for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.

EMEA publishes concept paper on the development of guidlines on the use of Pharmacogenomic Methodogologies in PK evaluation

The EMEA has published concept paper on the development of the guidelines on the use of pharmacodynamic methodologies in the pharmacokinetic evaluation of medicinal products.  In recent years there has been a rapid development regarding our understanding of the genetics behind interindividual differences in drug response. This development encompasses the area of pharmacodynamics where individual variability in genes encoding drug transporters, and drug metabolising enzymes affects the systemic and target organ exposure as as well as the occurrance of adverse drug reactions to pharmacologically active substances.

A reflection paper on the use of pharmacokinetics in the pharmacokinetic evaluation of medicinal products was published by the EMEA in May 2007. Since the drafting of this reflection paper, progress in the field has been considerable. In the light of evolution and broad acceptance of genotyping methods, as well is increased experience in the use of such pharmacognomic methodologies during drug development, it was considered appropriate to update aline this progress in the guidance on the topic.

The fundamental issues to be discussed in a proposed CHMP guideline is how to implement pharmacogenetics affecting PK in drug development, and the pharmacokinetic variability arising from pharmacogenetic differences may best be determined, how to assess clinical relevance of this pharmacokinetic differences and recommendations on how to reflect these data in the labelling.

The main additional topics to be addressed in the proposed guideline as compared to reflection paper are:

  • Clarifications regarding how and when to apply genotype during clinical development.
  • Data needed for evaluating the clinical relevance of  pharmacogenetic effect on drug exposure as well as the benefits of applying genotyping during clinical use.
  • Recommendations regarding pharmacokinetic studies investigating the effect of polymorphisms at transport level.
  • Guidance on specific technical aspects to be considered in accessing clinically relevant polymorphism (e.g. impact of different allelic variants).

Timetable for drawing up this guidance is as follows; it is anticipated that the guidance will be available nine months after adoption of this concept paper on purely six months external consultation, before finalisation within six months. External consultation from the pharmaceutical industry and academics and professional networks is welcomed by the EMEA.

If you would like more detail in this area please get in touch with Damien Bové damien.bove@idaconsultants.com

Damien Bové works as a drug development consultant (pharmaceutical or biotechnology) and regulatory consultant, we work with our clients to define a drug  development target, define a drug development strategy, define a regulatory strategy or define a commercial strategy. Our clients are generally raising funds or looking to license out their technology and we help them achieve it. If you want to know more don’t hesitate to get in touch.

ida consultants freestrategyconsultation 515x64 EMEA publishes concept paper on the development of guidlines on the use of Pharmacogenomic Methodogologies in PK evaluation

As you know this website is a great resourse for keeping up to date with developments and regulations, why not get our FREE monthly regulatory and market round up. You can un-subscribe at any time and we do not share your details with anybody.